Distributed leadership in online groups

We conducted research within a program serving future mathematics and science teachers. Groups of teachers worked primarily online in an asynchronous discussion environment on a 6-week task in which they applied learning-science ideas acquired from an educational psychology course to design interdisciplinary instructional units. We employed an adapted coding system to determine that group leadership was highly distributed among participants. We illustrated that leadership emerged through different forms of participation described in this paper and that, in some cases, individuals specialized in specific leadership roles within groups. Findings helped validate the theoretical concept of group cognition and led us to suggest an approach to online asynchronous learning for college students that depends more on students’ emergent leadership skills than on prescriptive assignment or scripting of participant roles.

[1]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. , 2000 .

[2]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Discourse Patterns During Children's Collaborative Online Discussions , 2007 .

[3]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[4]  S. Derry,et al.  Video Research in the Learning Sciences , 2007 .

[5]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge (Acting with Technology) , 2006 .

[6]  K. Kumpulainen,et al.  The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: an introduction to an analytic framework , 1999 .

[7]  L. Eby,et al.  Why Do High Self‐Monitors Emerge as Leaders in Small Groups? A Comparative Analysis of the Behaviors of High Versus Low Self‐Monitors1 , 2003 .

[8]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[9]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Making a mesh of it: a STELLAR approach to teacher professional development , 2005, CSCL.

[10]  R. Stogdill,et al.  Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. , 1958 .

[11]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[12]  P. Northouse Leadership theory and practice, 4th ed. , 2007 .

[13]  M. M. Chemers,et al.  Leadership research and theory: A functional integration. , 2000 .

[14]  G Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by design (expanded 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[15]  P. Northouse Leadership: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[16]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Embedded Case Study Methods , 2002 .

[17]  Jay Paredes Scribner,et al.  Teacher Teams and Distributed Leadership: A Study of Group Discourse and Collaboration , 2007 .

[18]  Linda R. Hare,et al.  Effectiveness and Efficiency in Small Academic Peer Groups , 2000 .

[19]  Brigid Barron When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[20]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Emergent Leadership in Children's Discussion Groups , 2007 .

[21]  Edwin P. Hollander,et al.  LEADERSHIP DYNAMICS: A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS , 1978 .

[22]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[23]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Cracking the Resource Nut With Distributed Problem-Based Learning in Secondary Teacher Education , 2002 .

[24]  P. Burger Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge , 2001 .

[25]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[26]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Educational Psychology: Reflection for Action , 2006 .

[27]  W. Firestone Alternative Arguments for Generalizing From Data as Applied to Qualitative Research , 1993 .

[28]  M. Chi Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .