A blind deblurring and image decomposition approach for astronomical image restoration

With the progress of adaptive optics systems, ground-based telescopes acquire images with improved resolutions. However, compensation for atmospheric turbulence is still partial, which leaves good scope for digital restoration techniques to recover fine details in the images. A blind image deblurring algorithm for a single long-exposure image is proposed, which is an instance of maximum-a-posteriori estimation posed as constrained non-convex optimization problem. A view of sky contains mainly two types of sources: point-like and smooth extended sources. The algorithm takes into account this fact explicitly by imposing different priors on these components, and recovers two separate maps for them. Moreover, an appropriate prior on the blur kernel is also considered. The resulting optimization problem is solved by alternating minimization. The initial experimental results on synthetically corrupted images are promising, the algorithm is able to restore the fine details in the image, and recover the point spread function.

[1]  Francois Rigaut,et al.  Principles, limitations, and performance of multiconjugate adaptive optics , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[2]  T. Chan,et al.  Convergence of the alternating minimization algorithm for blind deconvolution , 2000 .

[3]  M. Kasper,et al.  Adaptive Optics for Astronomy , 2012, 1201.5741.

[4]  Kirtland Afb,et al.  The Adaptive Optics Point Spread Function from Keck and Gemini , 2009 .

[5]  G. Ayers,et al.  Interative blind deconvolution method and its applications. , 1988, Optics Letters.

[6]  Zuowei Shen,et al.  A reweighted $l^2$ method for image restoration with Poisson and mixed Poisson-Gaussian noise , 2015 .

[7]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Understanding Blind Deconvolution Algorithms , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  J. C. Dainty,et al.  Iterative blind deconvolution method and its applications , 1988 .

[9]  Mike E. Davies,et al.  23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2015) , 2015 .

[10]  J. Conan,et al.  MISTRAL: a myopic edge-preserving image restoration method, with application to astronomical adaptive-optics-corrected long-exposure images. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  Michael Elad,et al.  Submitted to Ieee Transactions on Image Processing Image Decomposition via the Combination of Sparse Representations and a Variational Approach , 2022 .

[12]  J. Giovannelli,et al.  Positive deconvolution for superimposed extended source and point sources , 2005, astro-ph/0507691.

[13]  Luís B. Almeida,et al.  Blind and Semi-Blind Deblurring of Natural Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  É. Thiébaut,et al.  Strict a priori constraints for maximum-likelihood blind deconvolution , 1995 .

[15]  Rafael Molina,et al.  Image restoration in astronomy: a Bayesian perspective , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[16]  Eric Thiebaut,et al.  Optimization issues in blind deconvolution algorithms , 2002, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[17]  M. Cannon Blind deconvolution of spatially invariant image blurs with phase , 1976 .

[18]  Deepa Kundur,et al.  Blind Image Deconvolution , 2001 .

[19]  Ieee Staff 2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) , 2017 .

[20]  Jean-Marie Becker,et al.  Augmented Lagrangian without alternating directions: Practical algorithms for inverse problems in imaging , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[21]  T. Schulz,et al.  Multiframe blind deconvolution with real data: imagery of the Hubble Space Telescope. , 1997, Optics express.

[22]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Accelerated Edge-Preserving Image Restoration Without Boundary Artifacts , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Suvrit Sra,et al.  Online blind deconvolution for astronomical imaging , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP).