Automated blind control based on glare prevention with dimmable light in open-plan offices

Abstract This paper presents a simulation study of the control of automated venetian blinds for open-plan office spaces. It has been reported that a cut-off strategy in which the slat angle of the blind is determined to cut direct sunlight is not sufficient to avoid glare. Therefore, in this study, a glare prevention control is proposed whereby the slat angle is repeatedly altered until the glare degree is calculated to be less than the glare index limit. To predict glare degree, a metric that we developed, known as PGSV (Predicted Glare Sensation Vote), is used. To obtain PGSV, the average luminance of the window area including blind slats and the outside view seen between the slats is calculated. For electric lighting control, this study focuses on daylight reflected on the ceiling, which can reduce the required amount of light from electric lighting. The illuminance of the ceiling surface provided by light from the window areas is calculated. This electric light control integrated with blind control requires input from rooftop sensors, without need for indoor photo-sensors. It is suitable for offices using partitions that block light from the windows. The glare prevention method proposed in this paper shows greater slat angle than that in the cut-off strategy. However, it can reduce power consumption for lighting by approximately 30% in typical open-plan offices in Tokyo. Moreover, it provides 46–50% of view satisfaction, which is the percentage of working hours when the occupants are satisfied with the outside view.

[1]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Comparison of thermal transfer characteristics of wood flooring according to the installation method , 2014 .

[2]  Dagnachew Birru,et al.  An open-loop venetian blind control to avoid direct sunlight and enhance daylight utilization , 2012 .

[3]  Andreas K. Athienitis,et al.  Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: A critical review , 2013 .

[4]  L. G. Bakker,et al.  User satisfaction and interaction with automated dynamic facades: A pilot study , 2014 .

[5]  Kotaroh Hirate,et al.  A Discretezation Method of Direction Making Use of Axisymmetric Hexacosahedron which 26 Solid Angles Derived from each Polygon are All Equal. , 2002 .

[6]  Kyle Konis,et al.  Predicting visual comfort in side-lit open-plan core zones: Results of a field study pairing high dynamic range images with subjective responses , 2014 .

[7]  Per Heiselberg,et al.  Occupant satisfaction with two blind control strategies: Slats closed and slats in cut-off position , 2015 .

[8]  Robert Clear,et al.  Office Worker Response to an Automated Venetian Blind and Electric Lighting System: A Pilot Study , 1998 .

[9]  Toshie Iwata,et al.  THE EFFECT OF THE RATIO OF BLIND SLATS LUMINANCE TO OUTSIDE LUMINANCE ON OCCUPANTS' SATISFACTION WITH A VIEW THROUGH BLINDS , 2007 .

[10]  R. G. Hopkinson,et al.  Glare from daylighting in buildings. , 1972, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  Maria Kolokotroni,et al.  Prediction of discomfort glare from windows , 2003 .

[12]  Jan Wienold,et al.  DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF BLIND CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR VISUAL COMFORT AND ENERGY BALANCE ANALYSIS , 2007 .

[13]  Jia Hu,et al.  Illuminance-based slat angle selection model for automated control of split blinds , 2011 .

[14]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  Estimation of lighting energy savings from daylighting , 2009 .

[15]  Iason Konstantzos,et al.  Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare probability in offices with dynamic window shades , 2015 .

[16]  Mpj Mariëlle Aarts,et al.  Building automation and perceived control : a field study on motorized exterior blinds in Dutch offices , 2014 .

[17]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  Thermal and daylighting performance of an automated venetian blind and lighting system in a full-scale private office , 1998 .

[18]  Sandra Mende,et al.  CLIMATE BASED SIMULATION OF DIFFERENT SHADING DEVICE SYSTEMS FOR COMFORT AND ENERGY DEMAND , 2011 .

[19]  Myoung Souk Yeo,et al.  Automated blind control to maximize the benefits of daylight in buildings , 2010 .

[20]  Iason Konstantzos,et al.  Occupant interactions with shading and lighting systems using different control interfaces: A pilot field study , 2016 .

[21]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds , 2003 .

[22]  Mehlika Inanici,et al.  The Effect of Luminance Distribution Patterns on Occupant Preference in a Daylit Office Environment , 2010 .

[23]  Marc Schiler,et al.  Development of new daylight glare analysis methodology using absolute glare factor and relative glare factor , 2013 .

[24]  H. D. Einhorn.  A new method for the assessment of discomfort glare , 1969 .

[25]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Efficient venetian blind control strategies considering daylight utilization and glare protection , 2013 .

[26]  Berit Time,et al.  Solar shading control strategies in cold climates – Heating, cooling demand and daylight availability in office spaces , 2014 .

[27]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras , 2006 .

[28]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  A hybrid ray-tracing and radiosity method for calculating radiation transport and illuminance distribution in spaces with venetian blinds , 2012 .

[29]  Y. Koga,et al.  Models of sky radiance distribution and sky luminance distribution , 2004 .

[30]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  View types and luminance effects on discomfort glare assessment from windows , 2012 .

[31]  G. Newsham,et al.  A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings , 2007 .

[32]  Gillian Isoardi,et al.  Discomfort glare in open plan green buildings , 2014 .

[33]  Iason Konstantzos,et al.  View clarity index: A new metric to evaluate clarity of view through window shades , 2015 .