Comparative material-based life cycle analysis of structural beam-floor systems

Abstract In a residential building, various structural flooring systems are feasible. For moderate spans (4 m–6 m) and for a predetermined column grid, distinct combinations of wood, steel and concrete elements can be implemented as beam-floor system. Besides comparing these beam-floor systems based on weight, cost, speed of installation etc., a comparison can also be based on their environmental impact. Indeed, whereas some materials appear to be environmentally friendly for many applications, this may not be true for this particular case. For such a comparison, a life cycle assessment (LCA) according to ISO 14040/44 has been implemented in this paper. In this study, the functional unit consists of a square meter of a structural beam-floor system of an arbitrary composition, i.e. three main beam materials (concrete, steel and wood) have been combined with appropriate structural floor systems. The paper presents the results of the LCAs for different impact categories, and both midpoint and endpoint assessment methods. This provides a broad idea of the environmental profile of the considered beam-floor systems representative for current Belgian building practice for the defined functional unit. Furthermore, the influence of the respective impact assessment methods (ReCiPe World versus Europe) was found to be important, especially regarding wooden structural elements. Lastly, some sensitivity analyses (use of recycled aggregates, use of aerated concrete waste, transport types and distances, ratio virgin-recycled steel) have been performed in order to obtain a more nuanced view on the setup and results of this study. These sensitivity analyses show that mainly the ratio virgin-recycled steel in a beam-floor system can result in widely varying impacts on the environment and thus give some opportunities for improved environmental impact.

[1]  Mark Hughes,et al.  Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: A case study on building assessment , 2014 .

[2]  Phil Purnell,et al.  Material nature versus structural nurture: the embodied carbon of fundamental structural elements. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  T. Theodosiou,et al.  Normalising and assessing carbon emissions in the building sector: A review on the embodied CO 2 emissions of residential buildings , 2018 .

[4]  Umberto Arena,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building. , 2017, Waste management.

[5]  Jill A.E. Gunn,et al.  A review of uncertainty research in impact assessment , 2015 .

[6]  Antonio García-Martínez,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review , 2017 .

[7]  Mia Ala-Juusela,et al.  Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision-Makers , 2009 .

[8]  E. Sanyé-Mengual,et al.  Comparative LCA of recycled and conventional concrete for structural applications , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review , 2017 .

[10]  Xavier Gabarrell,et al.  Environmental assessment of façade-building systems and thermal insulation materials for different climatic conditions , 2016 .

[11]  Sumiani Yusoff,et al.  A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry , 2015 .

[12]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  Buildings environmental impacts' sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials , 2017 .

[13]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  Influence of construction material uncertainties on residential building LCA reliability , 2017 .

[14]  Johan Braet,et al.  Strategies for optimizing the environmental profile of dwellings in a Belgian context: A consequential versus an attributional approach , 2018 .

[15]  Phil Purnell,et al.  Embodied carbon dioxide in concrete: Variation with common mix design parameters , 2012 .

[16]  Luís Simões da Silva,et al.  Design of Steel Structures: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 2010 .

[17]  Phil Purnell,et al.  Is carbon dioxide pricing a driver in concrete mix design , 2016 .

[18]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of a house with alternative exterior walls: Comparison of three impact assessment methods , 2012 .

[19]  Eleni Iacovidou,et al.  Mining the physical infrastructure: Opportunities, barriers and interventions in promoting structural components reuse. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Patxi Hernandez,et al.  Analysis of life-cycle boundaries for environmental and economic assessment of building energy refurbishment projects , 2017 .