Media Naturalness and Online Learning: Findings Supporting Both the Significant- and No-Significant-Difference Perspectives

Is the use of an online course delivery format, when compared with the more traditional face-to-face format, good or bad in the context of university education? Those who subscribe to the no-significant-difference perspective argue that online delivery is good, because it allows students with time and geographic distance constraints to obtain the education that they need, with no significant negative impact on the quality of the learning experience. Others argue that online delivery is bad, advocating a version of the competing significant-difference perspective, because the electronic communication media used for online delivery are not rich or natural enough to enable effective learning. This study contrasted students perceptions and grades in two different sections of the same course: one delivered entirely online and the other delivered face to face. Data were collected and analyzed at two points in time, namely, at the middle and end of a long semester. The study found support for both the no-significant- and significant-difference perspectives. At the middle of the semester, students in the online condition perceived communication ambiguity as significantly higher, and also obtained significantly lower grades, than students in the face-to-face condition. At the end of the semester, no significant differences were found.

[1]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[2]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[3]  Allen S. Lee.  Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[4]  Jocelyn Calvert,et al.  Distance Education at the Crossroads , 2005 .

[5]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[6]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[7]  John Day,et al.  Instructors' Experiences with Using Groupware to Support Collaborative Project-Based Learning , 2004, International Journal of Distance Education Technologies.

[8]  Ned Kock,et al.  Compensatory adaptation to a lean medium: an action research investigation of electronic communication in process improvement groups , 2001 .

[9]  C. Boyd,et al.  CHENITZ, W.C., AND SWANSON, J. M. (1986). From Practice to Grounded Theory: Qualitative Research in Nursing Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley , 1989 .

[10]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[11]  Rudy Hirschheim.  The internet-based education bandwagon: look before you leap , 2005, CACM.

[12]  N. Kock,et al.  Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E-communication tools , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[13]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[14]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Finding a happy medium: explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work , 1994, TOIS.

[15]  Ned Kock,et al.  The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Ned Kock,et al.  Compensatory Adaptation to Media Obstacles: An Experimental Study of Process Redesign Dyads , 2005, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[17]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis with readings (2nd ed.) , 1986 .

[18]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Adaptive Processes for Achieving Socio-Technical Fit in Computer Supported Co-operative Work Groups , 2000 .

[19]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[20]  Dianne Willis,et al.  The New Sociotech: Graffiti on the Long Wall , 2000 .

[21]  Ned Kock,et al.  Web-based software contracting: an experimental study of deception identification across two different media , 2006, Int. J. Internet Enterp. Manag..

[22]  H. S. Wilson,et al.  Research in Nursing , 1985 .

[23]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[24]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[25]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[26]  Tiffany A. Whittaker,et al.  A Comparison of Student Achievement and Satisfaction in an Online Versus a Traditional Face-to-Face Statistics Class , 2005 .

[27]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[28]  J. L. Garloch,et al.  Information Sharing in Face-to-Face, Teleconferencing, and Electronic Chat Groups , 1998 .

[29]  Alvin Y. Wang,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Conventional and Web-Based Instructional Formats , 2005 .

[30]  H. Werley.  Research for nursing. , 1973, The Journal of nursing administration.

[31]  Maha El-Shinnawy,et al.  Acceptance of communication media in organizations: richness or features? , 1998 .

[32]  Lee Chye Seng,et al.  The Next Generation of E-Learning: Strategies for Media Rich Online Teaching and Engaged Learning , 2004, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[33]  R. Daft,et al.  The Selection of Communication Media as an Executive Skill , 1988 .

[34]  Randolph B. Cooper,et al.  Exploring the Core Concepts of Media Richness Theory: The Impact of Cue Multiplicity and Feedback Immediacy on Decision Quality , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..