Foraging Behavior and Energetics of Albatrosses in Contrasting Breeding Environments

Animals can maximize fitness by optimizing energy acquisition through the selection of favorable foraging habitats, but trade-offs exist between time spent in preferred feeding habitats, energetic costs of travel, and reproductive constraints. For pelagic seabirds, geographic distribution of suitable breeding islands can restrict access to marine prey resources and influence foraging strategies. Laysan (Phoebastria immutabilis) and black-footed albatrosses (P. nigripes) breeding in the Northwest Hawaiian Islands, and Indian yellow-nosed albatrosses (Thalassarche carteri) breeding in the Southern Indian Ocean, utilize productive subtropical-subpolar transition zones during their breeding and non-breeding periods, but this marine feature is at a comparatively greater distance for Hawaiian albatrosses during the breeding period due to location of nesting islands. We investigated the foraging behavior and energetics of these three species to evaluate how proximity to preferred marine habitats has influenced their overall foraging strategies. During incubation, all three species traveled to subtropical-subpolar transition zones, however, Hawaiian albatrosses ranged farther to reach this habitat. All species reduced time at sea during brooding, and Hawaiian albatrosses reduced their foraging ranges to distances similar to yellow-nosed albatrosses. As a consequence, Hawaiian albatrosses foraged in the warm, oligotrophic environment of the subtropical gyre during brooding while yellow-nosed albatrosses continued to forage in a subtropical-subpolar transition zone. Landing rates, an indicator of foraging effort, did not differ between reproductive stages and were highly variable within and among species. Hawaiian albatrosses generally spent more time in flight compared to yellow-nosed albatrosses, a strategy that may relate to searching for dispersed and unpredictable prey. Mean absolute field-metabolic rate (FMR) was greatest for black-footed albatrosses, and similar between Laysan and yellow-nosed albatrosses, but mass-specific FMR did not differ between species. Hawaiian albatrosses had lower total body water than yellow-nosed albatrosses (indicating greater lipid reserves), and had FMRs that fell below the allometric relationship for studied albatross species, attributes that likely reflect physiological adaptations for foraging in a low-productivity environment.

[1]  Kim Holland,et al.  Key Questions in Marine Megafauna Movement Ecology. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  R. Bivand,et al.  Tools for Reading and Handling Spatial Objects , 2016 .

[3]  D. Costa,et al.  Reproductive constraints influence habitat accessibility, segregation, and preference of sympatric albatross species , 2015, Movement ecology.

[4]  D. Costa,et al.  Shadowed by scale: subtle behavioral niche partitioning in two sympatric, tropical breeding albatross species , 2015, Movement ecology.

[5]  O. Olsson,et al.  A model for habitat selection and species distribution derived from central place foraging theory , 2014, Oecologia.

[6]  Christopher P. Barger,et al.  Does location really matter? An inter-colony comparison of seabirds breeding at varying distances from productive oceanographic features in the Bering Sea , 2013 .

[7]  W. Tickell The Biology of the Great Albatrosses, Diomedea Exulahs and Diomedea Epomophora , 2013 .

[8]  James H. Brown,et al.  Metabolic ecology : a scaling approach , 2012 .

[9]  D. Costa,et al.  Seabirds and Marine Mammals , 2012 .

[10]  S. Shaffer A review of seabird energetics using the doubly labeled water method. , 2011, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[11]  Scott A. Shaffer,et al.  Hawaiian albatrosses track interannual variability of marine habitats in the North Pacific , 2010 .

[12]  J. Speakman,et al.  Daily energy expenditure increases in response to low nutritional stress in an Arctic‐breeding seabird with no effect on mortality , 2009 .

[13]  Scott A. Shaffer,et al.  Wind, Waves, and Wing Loading: Morphological Specialization May Limit Range Expansion of Endangered Albatrosses , 2008, PloS one.

[14]  David G. Ainley,et al.  Flight speed of seabirds in relation to wind speed and direction , 2008 .

[15]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[16]  Daniel P. Costa,et al.  Foraging energetics of Grey‐headed Albatrosses Diotnedea chrysostoma at Bird Island, South Georgia , 2008 .

[17]  Michael A. Fedak,et al.  A simple new algorithm to filter marine mammal Argos locations , 2008 .

[18]  V. Afanasyev,et al.  Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day , 2007 .

[19]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Are seabirds foraging for unpredictable resources , 2007 .

[20]  D. Costa,et al.  Validation of Water Flux and Body Composition in Glaucous Gulls (Larus hyperboreus) , 2006, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[21]  Robert M. Suryan,et al.  Foraging destinations and marine habitat use of short-tailed albatrosses: A multi-scale approach using first-passage time analysis , 2006 .

[22]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  PREY DISTRIBUTION AND PATCHINESS: FACTORS IN FORAGING SUCCESS AND EFFICIENCY OF WANDERING ALBATROSSES , 2005 .

[23]  Richard R. Veit,et al.  Tracking Ocean Wanderers: The Global Distribution of Albatrosses and Petrels , 2005 .

[24]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Scale‐dependent habitat use in a long‐ranging central place predator , 2005 .

[25]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Effect of environmental variability on habitat selection, diet, provisioning behaviour and chick growth in yellow-nosed albatrosses , 2005 .

[26]  K. Nagy Field metabolic rate and body size , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  Scott R. Benson,et al.  From wind to whales: trophic links in a coastal upwelling system , 2005 .

[28]  D. Ainley,et al.  Marine mammal occurrence and ocean climate off central California, 1986 to 1994 and 1997 to 1999 , 2005 .

[29]  D. Costa,et al.  Field metabolic rates of black‐browed albatrosses Thalassarche melanophrys during the incubation stage , 2004 .

[30]  John P. Croxall,et al.  EFFECTS OF SATELLITE TRANSMITTERS ON ALBATROSSES AND PETRELS , 2003 .

[31]  D. Costa,et al.  Foraging effort in relation to the constraints of reproduction in free‐ranging albatrosses , 2003 .

[32]  K. Hyrenbach,et al.  Oceanographic habitats of two sympatric North Pacific albatrosses during the breeding season , 2002 .

[33]  K. Erikstad,et al.  Scale-dependent predator-prey interactions: the aggregative response of seabirds to prey under variable prey abundance and patchiness , 2002 .

[34]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Energy Expenditure of Incubating Wandering Albatrosses , 2001, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[35]  D. Costa,et al.  Behavioural factors affecting foraging effort of breeding wandering albatrosses , 2001 .

[36]  Patricia Fernández,et al.  Foraging destinations of three low‐latitude albatross (Phoebastria) species , 2001 .

[37]  A. Freeman Albatrosses , 2001, Oceanic Birds of the World.

[38]  D. Olson Biophysical dynamics of western transition zones: a preliminary synthesis , 2001 .

[39]  Robert R. Harris,et al.  Doubly-Labelled Water – Theory and Practice , 2001 .

[40]  S. Åkesson,et al.  The implications of location accuracy for the interpretation of satellite-tracking data , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  R. Pollard,et al.  Phytoplankton, nutrients and hydrography in the frontal zone between the Southwest Indian Subtropical gyre and the Southern Ocean , 2000 .

[42]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Seasonal changes in the provisioning behaviour and mass of male and female wandering albatrosses in relation to the growth of their chick , 2000, Polar Biology.

[43]  D. Costa,et al.  Fast and fuel efficient? Optimal use of wind by flying albatrosses , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  D. J. Anderson,et al.  NOCTURNAL AND DIURNAL FORAGING ACTIVITY OF HAWAIIAN ALBATROSSES DETECTED WITH A NEW IMMERSION MONITOR , 2000 .

[45]  Kjell Einar Erikstad,et al.  SCALE‐DEPENDENT PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS: THE HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SEABIRDS AND PREY , 2000 .

[46]  H. Ellegren,et al.  A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds , 1999 .

[47]  M. Barangé,et al.  Pelagic community structure of the subtropical convergence region south of Africa and in the mid-Atlantic ocean☆ , 1998 .

[48]  George L. Hunt,et al.  Comparative foraging ecology of planktivorous auklets in relation to ocean physics and prey availability , 1998 .

[49]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Feeding ecology of short-tailed shearwaters: breeding in Tasmania and foraging in the Antarctic? , 1998 .

[50]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  ALTERNATIVE FORAGING STRATEGIES AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION BY MALE AND FEMALE WANDERING ALBATROSSES , 1997 .

[51]  G. Hunt Physics, zooplankton, and the distribution of least auklets in the Bering Sea — a review , 1997 .

[52]  L. Ballance,et al.  SEABIRD COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ALONG A PRODUCTIVITY GRADIENT: IMPORTANCE OF COMPETITION AND ENERGETIC CONSTRAINT , 1997 .

[53]  C. Bost,et al.  Foraging behaviour of satellite-tracked king penguins in relation to sea-surface temperatures obtained by satellite telemetry at Crozet Archipelago, a study during three austral summers , 1997 .

[54]  W. Pearcy,et al.  Species associations of epipelagic nekton of the North Pacific Ocean, 1978–1993 , 1996 .

[55]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  A device for measuring seabird activity at sea , 1995 .

[56]  K. Keating An alternative index of satellite telemetry location error , 1994 .

[57]  A. Houston The efficiency of mass loss in breeding birds , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  Pierre Jouventin,et al.  Foraging Strategy of Wandering Albatrosses Through The Breeding Season: A Study Using Satellite Telemetry , 1993 .

[59]  C. Grimes,et al.  The surface accumulation of larval fishes by hydrodynamic convergence within the Mississippi River plume front , 1992 .

[60]  George L. Hunt,et al.  Foraging in a fractal environment: Spatial patterns in a marine predator-prey system , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[61]  J. Jehl,et al.  Total Body Water and Body Composition in Phalaropes and Other Birds , 1991, Physiological Zoology.

[62]  D. Costa Reproductive and Foraging Energetics of High Latitude Penguins, Albatrosses and Pinnipeds: Implications for Life History Patterns , 1991 .

[63]  M. Fedak,et al.  Measurement of the body composition of living gray seals by hydrogen isotope dilution. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[64]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Satellite tracking of Wandering albatrosses , 1990, Nature.

[65]  D. Schneider Seabirds and fronts: a brief overview , 1990 .

[66]  J. Lutjeharms,et al.  Southern ocean thermal fronts south of Africa , 1984 .

[67]  C. Pennycuick,et al.  Scaling of foraging radius and growth rates in petrels and albatrosses , 1984 .

[68]  K. Nagy,et al.  Flight Energetics of Free-Living Sooty Terns , 1984 .

[69]  C. Pennycuick The Flight of Petrels and Albatrosses (Procellariiformes), Observed in South Georgia and its Vicinity , 1982 .

[70]  T. Alerstam,et al.  Bird migration and reproduction in relation to habitats for survival and breeding , 1982 .

[71]  K. Nagy CO2 production in animals: analysis of potential errors in the doubly labeled water method. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[72]  D. Mackas,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Zooplankton Spatial Heterogeneity , 1979, Science.

[73]  D. Costa,et al.  Water and Energy Flux in Elephant Seal Pups Fasting under Natural Conditions , 1978, Physiological Zoology.

[74]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[75]  J. Emlen The Role of Time and Energy in Food Preference , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[76]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[77]  N. Lifson,et al.  Theory of use of the turnover rates of body water for measuring energy and material balance. , 1966, Journal of theoretical biology.

[78]  R. Ricklefs SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON THE REPRODUCTIVE ENERGETICS OF PELAGIC SEABIRDS , 2017 .

[79]  Ute Dreher,et al.  Evolution In Changing Environments Some Theoretical Explorations , 2016 .

[80]  M. Conners Comparative behavior, diet, and post-breeding strategies of two sympatric North Pacific albatross species (Phoebastria sp.) , 2015 .

[81]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[82]  D. Costa,et al.  Seabirds and Marine Mammals In Metabolic Ecology: A scaling approach , 2012 .

[83]  D. Costa,et al.  Physiological constraints on the foraging ecology and energetics of albatrosses and other large seabirds , 2008 .

[84]  K. Nagy,et al.  Incubation energetics of the Laysan Albatross , 2004, Oecologia.

[85]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Comparative activity pattern during foraging of four albatross species , 2002 .

[86]  D. Kobayashi,et al.  The transition zone chlorophyll front, a dynamic global feature defining migration and forage habitat for marine resources , 2001 .

[87]  W. Siegfried The use of tritiated water to determine protein and lipid utilization in fasting birds : a validation study in incubating Great-winged Petrels , Pterodroma macroptera , 2001 .

[88]  Donald B. Olson,et al.  Life on the edge : marine life and fronts , 1994 .

[89]  Peter Franks,et al.  Sink or swim: Accumulation of biomass at fronts , 1992 .

[90]  D. Olson,et al.  The concentrating of organisms at fronts: a cold-water fish and a warm-core Gulf Stream ring , 1985 .

[91]  G. Pyke Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review , 1984 .

[92]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2) , 1968 .