Access to open education, open content and open educational resources (OER) is gaining more and more attention worldwide. According to The New York Times, 2012 was the “year of the MOOC” (Massive Open Online Courses), while ‘CourseEra’, the largest ‘MOOC’ provider, reported registering 2.8 million students in March 2013, partnerships with 62 high prestige Universities and hundreds courses in several languages [1]. Recently 11 countries have joined forces to launch the first panEuropean 'MOOCs' initiative, with the support of the European Commission (http://www.openuped.eu) in order to reshape EU education via open educational environments and open educational resources (OER). The arrival of MOOCs has already changed dramatically the idea of education and has oriented learners to educational courses that are open, participatory, distributed and at the same time support the idea of lifelong networked learning. Language competencies and intercultural skills will more than ever be a part of the key qualifications needed to successfully work and live in this new reality. The need for MOOCs related to language education has already paved the way for the creation of the first “open and massive” foreign language courses. Many researches have already shown that the web is a rich field in putting real communication to practice, and explore new forms to exercise one’s language comprehension and fluency. Specifically, web 2.0 is participatory, immediate, authentic and it engages the community. All these are key features in language learning process and make Web 2.0 a promising language learning environment. However, the design and implementation of MOOCs with focus on language learning has not been explored yet and this paper aims to fill this research gap. More specifically the paper will first present the requirements for a successful online Language Learning course and then it will continue with the exploration of the use of MOOCs in Language Education. Next an evaluation of the platforms and the instructional design used so far for Massive Open Online Language Learning Courses will follow. Finally, after the presentation of possible concerns and recommendations regarding the Language Learning MOOCs, there will be a discussion that aims to draw the first conclusions of this research and share some future research plans.
[1]
Roy D. Pea,et al.
The MOOC as Distributed Intelligence: Dimensions of a Framework & Evaluation of MOOCs
,
2013,
CSCL.
[2]
George Siemens,et al.
The Open Course: Through the Open Door--Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement
,
2010
.
[3]
Stephen Krashen,et al.
The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications
,
1986
.
[4]
Li Yuan,et al.
MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education
,
2013
.
[5]
D. Keegan,et al.
Three Types of Interaction
,
2013
.
[6]
C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.
MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses.
,
2012
.
[7]
Terry Anderson,et al.
Interaction Equivalency in an OER, MOOCs and Informal Learning Era.
,
2013
.
[8]
William C. Ritchie,et al.
Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
,
1998
.
[9]
Michael H. Long.
The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
,
1996
.
[10]
Roy Williams,et al.
The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC
,
2010
.
[11]
Stella Hurd,et al.
Towards a Better Understanding of the Dynamic Role of the Distance Language Learner: Learner perceptions of personality, motivation, roles, and approaches
,
2006
.
[12]
Osvaldo Rodriguez.
The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses)
,
2013
.
[13]
J. Prabakaran,et al.
Massive Open Online Course
,
2014
.
[14]
T. Anderson,et al.
Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy.
,
2010
.
[15]
M. Swain.
Three functions of output in second language learning
,
1995
.