Use of Department of Veterans Affairs Administrative Data to Identify Veterans With Acute Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study

Study Design. This work compared administrative data obtained from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) databases with structured chart review. Objective. We set out to determine whether a decision tool using administrative data could discriminate acute from nonacute cases among the many patients seen for a low back pain (LBP)–related diagnosis. Summary of Background Data. Large health care systems' databases present an opportunity for conducting research and planning operations related to the management of highly burdensome conditions. An efficient method of identifying cases of acute LBP in these databases may be useful. Methods. This was a retrospective review of all consecutive Iraq and/or Afghanistan Veterans seen in a VA primary care service during a 6-month period. Administrative data were extracted from VA databases. Patients with at least 1 encounter that was coded with at least 1 LBP-related ICD-9 code were included. Structured chart review of electronic medical record free text was the “gold standard” to determine acute LBP cases. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association of administrative data variables with chart review findings. Results. We obtained complete data on 354 patient encounters, of which 83 (23.4%) were designated acute upon chart review. No diagnostic code was more likely to be used in acute cases than nonacute. We identified an administrative data model of 18 variables that were significant and positively associated with an acute case (C-statistic = 0.819). A reduced model of 5 variables including a lumbar magnetic resonance imaging order, tramadol prescription, skeletal muscle relaxant prescription, physical therapy order, and addition of a new LBP-related ICD-9 code to the electronic medical record remained reasonable (C-statistic = 0.784). Conclusion. Our results suggest that a decision model can identify acute from nonacute LBP cases in Veterans using readily available VA administrative data. Level of Evidence: N/A

[1]  Roger B. Davis,et al.  Worsening trends in the management and treatment of back pain. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[2]  Bernadette A. Thomas,et al.  Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[3]  Hongyan Du,et al.  Electronic Health Record–Based Detection of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection Relapse , 2013, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[4]  R. Mcnutt,et al.  Acute Severe Low Back Pain: A Population-based Study of Prevalence and Care-seeking , 1996, Spine.

[5]  S. Dagenais,et al.  A supermarket approach to the evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  Roger Chou,et al.  Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain: Advice for High-Value Health Care From the American College of Physicians , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  H. El‐Serag,et al.  The validity of viral hepatitis and chronic liver disease diagnoses in Veterans Affairs administrative databases , 2007, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[8]  Mary K Goldstein,et al.  Accuracy of computerized outpatient diagnoses in a Veterans Affairs general medicine clinic. , 2002, The American journal of managed care.

[9]  Ying Ma,et al.  Identifying patients with diabetes and the earliest date of diagnosis in real time: an electronic health record case-finding algorithm , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[10]  Aaron Trefler,et al.  The Future of Medical Diagnostics: Large Digitized Databases , 2012, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[11]  Michael E. Clark,et al.  Pain and combat injuries in soldiers returning from Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom: implications for research and practice. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  J. Caro,et al.  A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  G. Pransky,et al.  Early Intervention Options for Acute Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial with One-Year Follow-Up Outcomes , 2010, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[15]  R. Gatchel,et al.  A Cost Utility Analysis of Interdisciplinary Early Intervention Versus Treatment as Usual For High‐Risk Acute Low Back Pain Patients , 2010, Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.

[16]  R A Deyo,et al.  Use of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD‐9‐CM) to Identify Hospitalizations for Mechanical Low Back Problems in Administrative Databases , 1992, Spine.

[17]  K. Zou,et al.  Receiver-Operating Characteristic Analysis for Evaluating Diagnostic Tests and Predictive Models , 2007, Circulation.