The call of the road: factors predicting students’ car travelling intentions and behaviour

The most common daily trip for employed persons and students is the commute to and from work and/or place of study. Though there are clear environmental, health and safety benefits from using public transport instead of private vehicles for these trips, a high proportion of commuters still choose private vehicles to get to work or study. This study reports an investigation of psychological factors influencing students’ travel choices from the perspective of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). Students from three different university campuses (n = 186) completed a cross-sectional survey on their car commuting behaviour. Particular focus was given to whether car commuting habits could add to understanding of commuting behaviour over and above behavioural intentions. Results indicated that, as expected, behavioural intention to travel by car was the strongest TPB predictor of car commuting behaviour. Further, general car commuting habits explained additional variance over and above TPB constructs, though the contribution was modest. No relationship between habit and intentions was found. Overall results suggest that, although student car commuting behaviour is habitual in nature, it is predominantly guided by reasoned action. Implications of these findings are that in order to alter the use of private vehicles, the factors influencing commuters’ intentions to travel by car must be addressed. Specifically, interventions should target the perceived high levels of both the acceptability of commuting by car and the perceived control over travel undertaken by private vehicle.

[1]  J M Daley,et al.  SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS OF BUS RIDERS AND NON-RIDERS FOR DIFFERENT TRANSPORTATION METHODS , 1988 .

[2]  J. Garvill,et al.  Effects of increased awareness on choice of travel mode , 2003 .

[3]  J B Hanna,et al.  UNDERSTANDING AND PREDICTING PASSENGER RAIL TRAVEL: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1998 .

[4]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[5]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change , 2003 .

[6]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices , 1997 .

[7]  J. Greenslade,et al.  The Prediction of Above-Average Participation in Volunteerism: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Volunteers Functions Inventory in Older Australian Adults , 2005, The Journal of social psychology.

[8]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. , 1998 .

[9]  M. Elliott,et al.  Drivers' compliance with speed limits: an application of the theory of planned behavior. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Habit and information use in travel mode choices , 1997 .

[11]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  Habit versus planned behaviour: a field experiment. , 1998, The British journal of social psychology.

[12]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Time and Money: An Empirical Explanation of Behaviour in the Context of Travel‐Mode Choice with the German Microcensus , 2003 .

[13]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action , 2003 .

[15]  Will Murray,et al.  Factors predicting intentions to speed in a work and personal vehicle , 2004 .

[16]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers , 2004 .

[17]  Ryan E Rhodes,et al.  Relationships between personality, an extended theory of planned behaviour model and exercise behaviour. , 2003, British journal of health psychology.

[18]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Does habitual car use not lead to more resistance to change of travel mode? , 2003 .