Estimation of tobit-type models with individual specific effects

The aim of this paper is two-fold. First, we review recent estimators for censored regression and sample selection panel data models with unobservable individual specific effects, and show how the idea behind these estimators can be used to construct estimators for a variety of other Tobit-type models. The estimators presented in this paper are semiparametric, in the sense that they do not require the parametrization of the distribution of the unobservables. The second aim of the paper is to introduce a new class of estimators for the censored regression model. The advantage of the new estimators is that they can be applied under a stationarity assumption on the transitory error terms, which is weaker than the exchangeability assumption that is usually made in this literature. A similar generalization does not seem feasible for the estimators of the other models that are considered.

[1]  Myoung-jae Lee,et al.  First-difference estimator for panel censored-selection models , 2001 .

[2]  M. Carter,et al.  Getting Institutions “Right” for Whom? Credit Constraints and the Impact of Property Rights on the Quantity and Composition of Investment , 2003 .

[3]  Bo E. Honoré,et al.  Trimmed LAD and Least Squares Estimation of Truncated and Censored Regression Models with Fixed Effects , 1992 .

[4]  Bo E. Honoré,et al.  Pairwise difference estimators of censored and truncated regression models , 1994 .

[5]  Bo E. Honoré,et al.  Panel Data Models: Some Recent Developments , 2001 .

[6]  J. Heckman Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply , 1974 .

[7]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[9]  J. Powell,et al.  Semiparametric estimation of censored selection models with a nonparametric selection mechanism , 1993 .

[10]  Ian Barrodale,et al.  Algorithm 478: Solution of an Overdetermined System of Equations in the l1 Norm [F4] , 1974, Commun. ACM.

[11]  J. Heckman The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models , 1976 .

[12]  G. Rasch On General Laws and the Meaning of Measurement in Psychology , 1961 .

[13]  Bo E. Honoré,et al.  Orthogonality Conditions for Tobit Models with Fixed Effects , 1993 .

[14]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  SEMIPARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF RANDOM EFFECTS LINEAR MODELS FROM BINARY PANEL DATA , 1987 .

[15]  Bo E. Honoré,et al.  Estimation of Type 3 Tobit models using symmetric trimming and pairwise comparisons , 1997 .

[16]  Jason Abrevaya Leapfrog estimation of a fixed-effects model with unknown transformation of the dependent variable , 1999 .

[17]  Ekaterini Kyriazidou,et al.  Estimation of a Panel Data Sample Selection Model , 1997 .

[18]  M. Parisi,et al.  Is Private R&D Spending Sensitive to its Price? Empirical Evidence on Panel Data for Italy , 2001 .

[19]  E. B. Andersen,et al.  Asymptotic Properties of Conditional Maximum‐Likelihood Estimators , 1970 .

[20]  Songnian Chen Distribution-free estimation of the random coefficient dummy endogenous variable model , 1999 .

[21]  W. Greene Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: Comment , 1981 .

[22]  A. Soest,et al.  A smoothed maximum score estimator for the binary choice panel data model with an application to labour force participation , 1995 .