Prevention against equality

Common sense supports prevention policies aimed at improving survival prospects among the population. It is also widely acknowledged that an early death is a serious disadvantage, and that attention should be paid to the compensation of short-lived individuals. This paper re-examines the compatibility of those two concerns: prevention against early death and compensation for early death. We show that, under mild conditions, no social ordering on allocations can satisfy a concern for prevention and a concern for compensation. The reason is that if it is socially desirable to raise the number of survivors through prevention, it must also be, under costly prevention, desirable to deteriorate the living standards of the short-lived. We then explore two approaches to the prevention/compensation dilemma, and study the associated optimal allocation of resources.

[1]  Anthony B. Atkinson,et al.  Lectures on public economics , 1988 .

[2]  Bengt Hansson,et al.  The independence condition in the theory of social choice , 1973 .

[3]  L P Knudsen,et al.  Mortality among the elderly in the Alameda County Study: behavioral and demographic risk factors. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[4]  A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare: Bibliography , 2011 .

[5]  R. Easterlin.  How beneficent is the market? A look at the modern history of mortality. , 1999, European review of economic history.

[6]  Marc Fleurbaey,et al.  Compensating the Dead , 2011 .

[7]  Elisha A. Pazner,et al.  Egalitarian Equivalent Allocations: A New Concept of Economic Equity , 1978 .

[8]  I. Leveson,et al.  The Production of Health, an Exploratory Study , 1969 .

[9]  M. Fleurbaey.  Fairness, responsibility, and welfare , 2008 .

[10]  G. Becker,et al.  The Quantity and Quality of Life and the Evolution of World Inequality , 2003, The American economic review.

[11]  Fritz L. Laux,et al.  The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. , 2004, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[12]  M. Fleurbaey,et al.  A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare , 2011 .

[13]  P. Portney,et al.  Air pollution, cigarette smoking, and the production of respiratory health. , 1990, Journal of health economics.

[14]  P H LONG,et al.  On the quantity and quality of life. , 1960, Medical times.

[15]  Peter J. Hammond,et al.  Equity in Two Person Situations: Some Consequences , 1979 .

[16]  J. Mullahy,et al.  Employment, Unemployment, and Problem Drinking , 1995, Journal of health economics.

[17]  P. Slovic.  Cigarette Smokers: Rational Actors or Rational Fools? , 2013 .

[18]  Andrew M. Jones,et al.  Socio-economic status, health and lifestyle. , 2004, Journal of health economics.

[19]  M. Jarvis,et al.  Effectiveness of smoking cessation initiatives. Efforts must take into account smokers' disillusionment with smoking and their delusions about stopping. , 2002, BMJ.

[20]  Andrew M. Jones,et al.  Mortality, lifestyle and socio-economic status. , 2008, Journal of health economics.

[21]  J. Foulds.  Effectiveness of smoking cessation initiatives , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  R. Easterlin.  How beneficent is the market? A look at the modern history of mortality. , 1999, European review of economic history.

[23]  Kaare Christensen,et al.  The quest for genetic determinants of human longevity: challenges and insights , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.