Data quality program management for digital shadows of products

Abstract Nowadays, companies are facing challenges due to increasingly dynamic market environments, a growing internal and external complexity, as well as globally intensifying competition. To keep pace, companies need to establish extensive knowledge about their business and its surroundings based on insights generated through the analysis of data. The digital shadow is a novel information system concept that integrates data of heterogeneous sources to provide product-related information to stakeholders across the company. The concept aims at improving the results of decision making, enabling advanced data analyses, and increasing information handling efficiency. As insufficient information quality has immediate effects on the utility of the information and induces significant costs, managing the quality of the digital shadow data basis is crucial. However, there are currently no comprehensive methodologies for the assessment and improvement of the data quality of digital shadows. Therefore, this paper introduces a methodology that supports the derivation of data quality projects aimed at optimizing the digital shadow data basis. The proposed methodology comprises four steps: First, digital shadow use cases along the product lifecycle are described. Next, the use cases are prioritized with regard to the expected benefits of applying the digital shadow. Third, quality deficiencies in the digital shadow data basis are assessed with respect to use case specific requirements. Finally, the prioritized use cases in relation with the identified quality deficits allow deriving needs for action, which are addressed by data quality projects. Together, the data quality projects constitute a data quality program. The methodology is applied in an industry case to prove the practical effectivity and efficiency.

[1]  Mohammed Salim Benqatla,et al.  Decision Support System for Implementing Data Quality Projects , 2015, DATA.

[2]  Jay Lee,et al.  Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment , 2013 .

[3]  Victor Tang,et al.  Data, information, knowledge and intelligence: The mega-nano hypothesis and its implications in innovation , 2016 .

[4]  P. O'Donovan,et al.  Big data in manufacturing: a systematic mapping study , 2015, Journal of Big Data.

[5]  Philip Woodall,et al.  Data quality assessment: The Hybrid Approach , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[6]  T. Cheng,et al.  The relationships between information management, process management and operational performance: Internal and external contexts , 2018 .

[7]  A. Lederer,et al.  An Instrument for Assessing the Organizational Benefits of IS Projects , 1998 .

[8]  Anders Haug,et al.  The costs of poor data quality , 2011 .

[9]  Yingfeng Zhang,et al.  A comprehensive review of big data analytics throughout product lifecycle to support sustainable smart manufacturing: A framework, challenges and future research directions , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[10]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Robert Winter,et al.  Method Support of Information Requirements Analysis for Analytical Information Systems , 2011, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[12]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The transformational dimension in the realization of business value from information technology , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Michael H. Breitner,et al.  Creating the foundation for digital twins in the manufacturing industry: an integrated installed base management system , 2018, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[14]  Günther Schuh,et al.  Der Digitale Schatten in der Auftragsabwicklung , 2016 .

[15]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment , 2001 .

[16]  Sunil Erevelles,et al.  Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing , 2016 .

[17]  Fei Tao,et al.  Big Data in product lifecycle management , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[18]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data quality assessment , 2002, CACM.

[19]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.

[20]  Antonio Carlos Gastaud Maçada,et al.  IT business value model for information intensive organizations , 2012 .

[21]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Trust and distrust in information systems at the workplace , 2018, PeerJ.

[22]  Linda C. Smith,et al.  A framework for information quality assessment , 2007 .

[23]  Cathy A. Enz,et al.  Strategies for the Implementation of Service Innovations , 2012 .

[24]  Boris Otto,et al.  Toward a functional reference model for master data quality management , 2011, Information Systems and e-Business Management.

[25]  Danilo Ardagna,et al.  Context-aware data quality assessment for big data , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[26]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  A product perspective on total data quality management , 1998, CACM.

[27]  Yangyong Zhu,et al.  The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era , 2015, Data Sci. J..

[28]  Thomas Bauernhansl,et al.  The Digital Shadow of production – A concept for the effective and efficient information supply in dynamic industrial environments , 2018 .

[29]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[30]  Michael H. Breitner,et al.  Towards a Smart Services Enabling Information Architecture for Installed Base Management in Manufacturing , 2017, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[31]  Chao-Ton Su,et al.  Managing product and customer knowledge in innovative new product development , 2007 .

[32]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..