A rodent brain-machine interface paradigm to study the impact of paraplegia on BMI performance

BACKGROUND Most brain machine interfaces (BMI) focus on upper body function in non-injured animals, not addressing the lower limb functional needs of those with paraplegia. A need exists for a novel BMI task that engages the lower body and takes advantage of well-established rodent spinal cord injury (SCI) models to study methods to improve BMI performance. NEW METHOD A tilt BMI task was designed that randomly applies different types of tilts to a platform, decodes the tilt type applied and rights the platform if the decoder correctly classifies the tilt type. The task was tested on female rats and is relatively natural such that it does not require the animal to learn a new skill. It is self-rewarding such that there is no need for additional rewards, eliminating food or water restriction, which can be especially hard on spinalized rats. Finally, task difficulty can be adjusted by making the tilt parameters. RESULTS This novel BMI task bilaterally engages the cortex without visual feedback regarding limb position in space and animals learn to improve their performance both pre and post-SCI.Comparison with Existing Methods: Most BMI tasks primarily engage one hemisphere, are upper-body, rely heavily on visual feedback, do not perform investigations in animal models of SCI, and require nonnaturalistic extrinsic motivation such as water rewarding for performance improvement. Our task addresses these gaps. CONCLUSIONS The BMI paradigm presented here will enable researchers to investigate the interaction of plasticity after SCI and plasticity during BMI training on performance.

[1]  M. Popovic,et al.  PID Controller Design for FES Applied to Ankle Muscles in Neuroprosthesis for Standing Balance , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[2]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  Bidirectional control of a one-dimensional robotic actuator by operant conditioning of a single unit in rat motor cortex , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  K A Moxon,et al.  Functional role of exercise-induced cortical organization of sensorimotor cortex after spinal transection. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  P. Guertin.  The mammalian central pattern generator for locomotion , 2009, Brain Research Reviews.

[5]  Marc H Schieber,et al.  Rapid acquisition of novel interface control by small ensembles of arbitrarily selected primary motor cortex neurons. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates , 2000, Nature.

[7]  Meel Velliste,et al.  Motor Cortical Correlates of Arm Resting in the Context of a Reaching Task and Implications for Prosthetic Control , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Christie K. Ferreira,et al.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study , 2011, The Lancet.

[9]  M. Ohkura,et al.  Reward-timing-dependent bidirectional modulation of cortical microcircuits during optical single-neuron operant conditioning , 2014, Nature Communications.

[10]  Marion Murray,et al.  Direct Agonists for Serotonin Receptors Enhance Locomotor Function in Rats that Received Neural Transplants after Neonatal Spinal Transection , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Yan Li,et al.  A Brain-Machine-Muscle Interface for Restoring Hindlimb Locomotion after Complete Spinal Transection in Rats , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  Ian R. Wickersham,et al.  A Circuit Mechanism for Differentiating Positive and Negative Associations , 2015, Nature.

[13]  V R Edgerton,et al.  Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Francis R. Willett,et al.  Restoration of reaching and grasping in a person with tetraplegia through brain-controlled muscle stimulation: a proof-of-concept demonstration , 2017, The Lancet.

[15]  Douglas L. Rosene,et al.  Humane Non-Human Primate Model of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Utilizing Electromyography as a Measure of Impairment and Recovery , 2013 .

[16]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of spinal cord injury animal models , 2014, Neural regeneration research.

[17]  S. Giszter,et al.  Trunk Robot Rehabilitation Training with Active Stepping Reorganizes and Enriches Trunk Motor Cortex Representations in Spinal Transected Rats , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Gytis Baranauskas,et al.  What limits the performance of current invasive brain machine interfaces? , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[19]  E. Hall,et al.  Translational spinal cord injury research: preclinical guidelines and challenges. , 2012, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[20]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Motor Skill Learning Is Associated with Phase-Dependent Modifications in the Striatal cAMP/PKA/DARPP-32 Signaling Pathway in Rodents , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Francis R. Willett,et al.  High performance communication by people with paralysis using an intracortical brain-computer interface , 2017, eLife.

[22]  Patrick D. Ganzer,et al.  Serotonergic pharmacotherapy promotes cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury , 2013, Experimental Neurology.

[23]  J. Carmena,et al.  Emergence of a Stable Cortical Map for Neuroprosthetic Control , 2009, PLoS biology.

[24]  Aaron C. Koralek,et al.  Volitional modulation of optically recorded calcium signals during neuroprosthetic learning , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Karen A Moxon,et al.  Dissociating Movement from Movement Timing in the Rat Primary Motor Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  T. Hikida,et al.  Neural mechanisms of the nucleus accumbens circuit in reward and aversive learning , 2016, Neuroscience Research.

[27]  A. Schwartz,et al.  High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia , 2013, The Lancet.

[28]  Karen A. Moxon,et al.  Encoding of temporal intervals in the rat hindlimb sensorimotor cortex , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[29]  R. Andersen,et al.  Volitional Control of Neural Activity Relies on the Natural Motor Repertoire , 2013, Current Biology.

[30]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Brain-Machine Interfaces beyond Neuroprosthetics , 2015, Neuron.

[31]  Michel A. Lemay,et al.  Characterization and validation of a split belt treadmill for measuring hindlimb ground-reaction forces in able-bodied and spinalized felines , 2017, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  E. Fetz,et al.  Operantly conditioned patterns on precentral unit activity and correlated responses in adjacent cells and contralateral muscles. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Farzam Farahmand,et al.  Modular neuromuscular control of human locomotion by central pattern generator. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  J. Barthe,et al.  Long-lasting recovery of locomotor function in chronic spinal rat following chronic combined pharmacological stimulation of serotonergic receptors with 8-OHDPAT and quipazine , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  Anish A. Sarma,et al.  Clinical translation of a high-performance neural prosthesis , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[36]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Passive Exercise of the Hind Limbs after Complete Thoracic Transection of the Spinal Cord Promotes Cortical Reorganization , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[38]  T. Leergaard,et al.  Three‐dimensional topography of corticopontine projections from rat sensorimotor cortex: Comparisons with corticostriatal projections reveal diverse integrative organization , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[39]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[40]  David Guiraud,et al.  Implanted functional electrical stimulation: case report of a paraplegic patient with complete SCI after 9 years , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[41]  Robert E Kass,et al.  Functional network reorganization during learning in a brain-computer interface paradigm , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Anatol C. Kreitzer,et al.  Distinct roles for direct and indirect pathway striatal neurons in reinforcement , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  R. J. Gregor,et al.  Effects of training on the recovery of full-weight-bearing stepping in the adult spinal cat , 1986, Experimental Neurology.

[44]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Interactive Effects Between Exercise and Serotonergic Pharmacotherapy on Cortical Reorganization After Spinal Cord Injury , 2016, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[45]  Qin,et al.  A Brain–Spinal Interface Alleviating Gait Deficits after Spinal Cord Injury in Primates , 2017 .

[46]  Ronald J. Triolo,et al.  Simulating the restoration of standing balance at leaning postures with functional neuromuscular stimulation following spinal cord injury , 2015, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[47]  Dragan F. Dimitrov,et al.  Reversible large-scale modification of cortical networks during neuroprosthetic control , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Cortex-dependent recovery of unassisted hindlimb locomotion after complete spinal cord injury in adult rats , 2017, eLife.

[49]  D Graupe,et al.  Thoracic Level Complete Paraplegia Walking Performance, Training and Medical Benefits with the PARASTEP FES System , 2015 .

[50]  Yves Frégnac,et al.  “Master” Neurons Induced by Operant Conditioning in Rat Motor Cortex during a Brain-Machine Interface Task , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Locomotor ability in spinal rats is dependent on the amount of activity imposed on the hindlimbs during treadmill training. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[52]  Jose M. Carmena,et al.  Emergence of Coordinated Neural Dynamics Underlies Neuroprosthetic Learning and Skillful Control , 2017, Neuron.

[53]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  W. Kirchner.  Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[55]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Neural population dynamics during reaching , 2012, Nature.

[56]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Decoding Complete Reach and Grasp Actions from Local Primary Motor Cortex Populations , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos,et al.  Brain-machine interface: Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002, Nature.

[58]  V. Rahimi-Movaghar,et al.  Animal models of spinal cord injury: a systematic review , 2017, Spinal Cord.

[59]  Michel Cyr,et al.  Differential gene expression profiling in the mouse brain during motor skill learning: Focus on the striatum structure , 2011, Behavioural Brain Research.

[60]  Anatol C. Kreitzer,et al.  Striatal mechanisms underlying movement, reinforcement, and punishment. , 2012, Physiology.

[61]  K. Ganguly,et al.  Reactivation of emergent task-related ensembles during slow-wave sleep after neuroprosthetic learning , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  Aaron C. Koralek,et al.  Corticostriatal plasticity is necessary for learning intentional neuroprosthetic skills , 2012, Nature.

[63]  Gordon Cheng,et al.  Long-Term Training with a Brain-Machine Interface-Based Gait Protocol Induces Partial Neurological Recovery in Paraplegic Patients , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[64]  M L Boninger,et al.  Ten-dimensional anthropomorphic arm control in a human brain−machine interface: difficulties, solutions, and limitations , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[65]  Toshiki Endo,et al.  Cortical sensory map rearrangement after spinal cord injury: fMRI responses linked to Nogo signalling. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[66]  Karen A. Moxon,et al.  Decoding Hindlimb Movement for a Brain Machine Interface after a Complete Spinal Transection , 2012, PloS one.

[67]  Karen A. Moxon,et al.  Therapy induces widespread reorganization of motor cortex after complete spinal transection that supports motor recovery , 2016, Experimental Neurology.

[68]  Simon F. Giszter,et al.  Plasticity and alterations of trunk motor cortex following spinal cord injury and non-stepping robot and treadmill training , 2014, Experimental Neurology.

[69]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  By Carrot or by Stick: Cognitive Reinforcement Learning in Parkinsonism , 2004, Science.

[70]  Karen A. Moxon,et al.  Skilled hindlimb reaching task in rats as a platform for a brain-machine interface to restore motor function after complete spinal cord injury , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[71]  J. Barthe,et al.  5‐HT1A receptors are involved in short‐ and long‐term processes responsible for 5‐HT‐induced locomotor function recovery in chronic spinal rat , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[72]  M. Laubach,et al.  Independent component analyses for quantifying neuronal ensemble interactions , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[73]  C. Crone,et al.  The spinal pathophysiology of spasticity – from a basic science point of view , 2007, Acta physiologica.

[74]  A Curt,et al.  Validation of the weight-drop contusion model in rats: a comparative study of human spinal cord injury. , 2000, Journal of neurotrauma.

[75]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  PSTH-based classification of sensory stimuli using ensembles of single neurons , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[76]  An H. Do,et al.  The feasibility of a brain-computer interface functional electrical stimulation system for the restoration of overground walking after paraplegia , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.