Haemodynamic study examining the response of venous blood flow to electrical stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle in patients with chronic venous disease.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to explore the option of stimulating calf muscle contraction through externally applied neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and to measure venous blood flow response to this stimulation. METHODS Ten patients with class 6 chronic venous disease (CEAP clinical classification) were recruited. Measurements of peak venous velocities in the popliteal vein were recorded by Duplex scanning in response to six test conditions; 1. Standing, 2. Voluntary calf muscle contraction, 3. Standing with NMES applied, 4. Standing with compression bandaging applied to the leg, 5. Voluntary calf muscle contraction with compression bandaging applied to the leg, 6. Stationary with compression bandaging applied to the leg and NMES applied. Comfort assessment was completed using visual analogue scales at each test stage and on study completion each patient completed a short structured interview to determine comfort and acceptability of NMES. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS, Version 9. Non-parametric testing was used in all analyses using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test for paired samples. RESULTS There was a significant increase in venous velocities on voluntary contraction of the calf muscle (median resting vel 7.3 cm/s; voluntary contraction median 70 cm/s) and with the introduction of NMES, both with compression (median velocity 15 cm/s, p = 0.005 Wilcoxon) and without compression (median velocity 13 cm/s, p = 0.005 Wilcoxon). The greatest increase with NMES was when combined with compression bandaging. All patients reported the stimulus as an acceptable treatment option with 90% reporting NMES as comfortable. CONCLUSIONS Healing rates in venous ulceration with the application of compression bandaging remain between 50 and 70%. This study shows a positive haemodynamic response to NMES. Further research is needed to quantitatively measure the effect of NMES on ulcer healing.

[1]  K. Poskitt,et al.  Ankle Motility is a Risk Factor for Healing of Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers , 2001 .

[2]  G. Lyons,et al.  An investigation of the effect of electrode size and electrode location on comfort during stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  K. Hardinge,et al.  The relationship of foot and ankle movements to venous return in the lower limb. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  A review of portable FES-based neural orthoses for the correction of drop foot , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  C. McCollum,et al.  Venous disease is associated with an impaired range of ankle movement. , 2003, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[6]  Brian Reed The Physiology of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation , 1997 .

[7]  Donald D. Price,et al.  A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales , 1994, Pain.

[8]  P. Burke,et al.  The limerick leg-ulcer project: Early results , 1999, Irish journal of medical science.

[9]  Ariana M. Kelly The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain , 2001, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[10]  C. Patterson,et al.  Quantifying meaningful changes in pain , 1998, Anaesthesia.

[11]  G. Alon,et al.  The effects of selected stimulus waveforms on pulse and phase characteristics at sensory and motor thresholds. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[12]  J. Staubesand,et al.  Use of duplex sonography to investigate the effect of active and passive movement at the ankle joint for promoting venous return , 1995, Clinical anatomy.

[13]  G. Lyons,et al.  The effect of electrical stimulation of the calf muscle and compression stocking on venous blood flow velocity. , 2002, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery.