Between-trial inhibition and facilitation in goal-directed aiming: manual and spatial asymmetries

Three experiments were conducted with right-handed participants to examine between-trial inhibition and facilitation effects in goal-directed aiming. Participants were required to execute rapid left-hand or right-hand aiming movements upon illumination of a target light in left or right space. Thus, from trial to trial, participants executed movements to either the same target location or a different target location with the either same hand or the other hand. Our reaction time results indicated that participants were particularly slow in initiating their movements when they were required to return to the same target location with the other hand. This was especially the case when the right hand was required to move to a target just occupied by the left hand. For both reaction time and movement time the right hand but not the left hand exhibited an advantage when it was required to perform the same movement two times in a row. Taken together these results suggest that inhibition of return, in a target-target paradigm, is more associated with the particular spatial location of the target than the organization of a specific movement to that location. Moreover, the between-trial facilitation observed for the right hand may reflect the ability of the left cerebral hemisphere to maintain an already parameterized motor program over a short intertrial interval.

[1]  Jon Driver,et al.  Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in the programming of speech , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[3]  M. Bryden Measuring handedness with questionnaires , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[5]  R. Cohen The Neuropsychology of Attention , 1993, Critical Issues in Neuropsychology.

[6]  Carlo Alberto Marzi,et al.  Neuropsychology of Attention , 2020, Handbook of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.

[7]  R. Schmidt Control Processes In Motor Skills , 1976, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[8]  D. Elliott,et al.  Hand deviations toward distractors Evidence for response competition , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  D. Carey,et al.  Hemispatial differences in visually guided aiming are neither hemispatial nor visual , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  D. Elliott,et al.  Visual regulation of manual aiming , 1993 .

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[13]  S. Tipper,et al.  Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Exploring the consequences of the previous trial , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[18]  R. Sainburg Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  J. Cullen,et al.  Manual Asymmetries in Goal-Directed Movement: Examination of the Motor Output Hypothesis , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  A. Sereno,et al.  Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Visual search and target-directed action , 1999 .

[22]  S. Tipper,et al.  Reaching into cluttered visual environments: spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects. , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  J. Hellige,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in vigilance and cerebral arousal mechanisms in younger and older adults. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[24]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Manual Asymmetries in Motor Performance , 1996 .

[25]  S. Tipper,et al.  Inhibition of return in a selective reaching task: an investigation of reference frames. , 1999, The Journal of general psychology.

[26]  Richard G. Carson,et al.  Manual Asymmetries in the Preparation and Control of Goal-Directed Movements , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[27]  M. Raibert Motor Control and Learning by the State Space Model , 1977 .

[28]  D. Rosenbaum Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  D. Elliott,et al.  Asymmetries in the Preparation and Control of Manual Aiming Movements , 1993 .

[30]  S. Tipper,et al.  Behavioral consequences of selection from neural population codes. , 2000 .

[31]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control , 1992 .

[32]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Ipsilateral inhibition and contralateral facilitation of simple reaction time to non-foveal visual targets from non-informative visual cues. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[33]  B. Weaver,et al.  The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[35]  J Driver,et al.  Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  G. Tassinari,et al.  The contribution of general and specific motor inhibitory sets to the so-called auditory inhibition of return , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[38]  S. Tipper,et al.  Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: Evidence for dual orienting mechanisms , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  D. Elliott,et al.  Movement Trajectories in the Presence of a Distracting Stimulus: Evidence for a Response Activation Model of Selective Reaching , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  Timothy N Welsh,et al.  Effects of response priming and inhibition on movement planning and execution. , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[41]  R. Abrams,et al.  Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Action-centred negative priming: Evidence for reactive inhibition , 2002 .