How many crashes can connected vehicle and automated vehicle technologies prevent: A meta-analysis.

The connected and automated vehicle (CAV) technologies have made great progresses. It has been commonly accepted that CV or AV technologies would reduce human errors in driving and benefit traffic safety. However, the answer of how many crashes can be prevented because of CV or AV technologies has not reached a consistent conclusion. In order to quantitatively answer this question, this study used meta-analysis to evaluate the safety effectiveness of nine common and important CV or AV technologies, and tested the safety effectiveness of these technologies for six countries. First, 73 studies about the safety impact of CV or AV technologies were filtered out from 826 CAV-related papers or reports. Second, the safety impacts of these technologies with regard to assistant types and triggering times have been compared. It shows AV technologies can play a more significant role than CV technologies, and the technologies with closer triggering time to collision time have greater safety effectiveness. Third, in the meta-analysis, the random effect model was used to evaluate the safety effectiveness, and the funnel plots and trim-and-fill method were used to evaluate and adjust publication bias, so as to objectively evaluate the safety effectiveness of each technology. Then, according to the crash data of six countries, the comprehensive safety effectiveness and compilation of safety effectiveness of the above technologies were calculated. The results show that if all of technologies were implemented in the six countries, the average number of crashes could be reduced by 3.40 million, among which the India would reduce the most (54.24%). Additionally, different countries should develop different development strategies, e.g., USA should prioritize the development of the lane change warning and intersection warning, the UK should prioritize applications related to intersection warning and rear-end warning. Overall, this study provides comprehensive and quantitative understating of the safety effectiveness of CA or AV technologies and would contribute to government, vehicle companies, and agencies in deciding the development priority of CA or AV technologies.

[1]  Feng Guo,et al.  Efficacy of roll stability control and lane departure warning systems using carrier-collected data. , 2015, Journal of safety research.

[2]  A Lie,et al.  Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Pete Thomas,et al.  Crash Involvement Risks of Cars with Electronic Stability Control Systems in Great Britain , 2006 .

[4]  Charles M. Farmer,et al.  Effects of Electronic Stability Control: An Update , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[5]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Model of fleet-wide safety benefits of Lane Departure Warning systems , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[6]  Hampton C Gabler,et al.  Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  Libo Cao,et al.  Investigation Into the Effect of an Intersection Crash Warning System on Driving Performance in a Simulator , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[8]  R Elvik,et al.  Area-wide urban traffic calming schemes: a meta-analysis of safety effects. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Robert Anderson,et al.  Potential Benefits of Autonomous Emergency Braking Based on In-Depth Crash Reconstruction and Simulation , 2013 .

[10]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Crash and injury prevention estimates for intersection driver assistance systems in left turn across path/opposite direction crashes in the United States , 2019, Traffic injury prevention.

[11]  Aline Chouinard,et al.  A study of the effectiveness of Electronic Stability Control in Canada. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  S.P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Field Operational Test "The Assisted Driver" , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[14]  Salvatore Cafiso,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of ADAS in reducing multi-vehicle collisions , 2012 .

[15]  Yang Li,et al.  Evaluation of Forward Collision Avoidance system using driver's hazard perception , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[16]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Valuing the Safety Benefits of Connected and Automated Vehicle Technologies , 2016 .

[17]  Kip Smith,et al.  Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Nancy McMillan,et al.  Volvo Trucks Field Operational Test: Evaluation of Advanced Safety Systems for Heavy Trucks , 2007 .

[19]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Model of collision avoidance with lane departure warning in real-world departure collisions with fixed roadside objects , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Publication Bias in Road Safety Evaluation: How can It be Detected and how Common is It? , 2010 .

[21]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Has Electronic Stability Control Reduced Rollover Crashes , 2019 .

[22]  Brian N. Fildes,et al.  Automatic Emergency Braking for Pedestrians: Effective Target Population and Expected Safety Benefits , 2013 .

[23]  Kui Yang,et al.  Impact of data aggregation approaches on the relationships between operating speed and traffic safety. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Brian Fildes,et al.  The extent of backover collisions internationally , 2018, Traffic injury prevention.

[25]  George Bahouth,et al.  Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems , 2018, Traffic injury prevention.

[26]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  The Effectiveness of ESP (Electronic Stability Program) in Reducing Real Life Accidents , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[27]  G Bahouth Real world crash evaluation of vehicle stability control (VSC) technology. , 2005, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[28]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  Head Injury Reduction Potential of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems Based on Accident and Experimental Data - Benefit of Combining Passive and Active Systems , 2014 .

[29]  Ling Wang,et al.  Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles' advanced driver assistance, connectivity and low level automation systems. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Jack Bowden,et al.  How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts? , 2010 .

[31]  Yiheng Feng,et al.  Integrated optimization of traffic signals and vehicle trajectories at isolated urban intersections , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[32]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[33]  Jessica B. Cicchino,et al.  Effects of blind spot monitoring systems on police-reported lane-change crashes , 2018, Traffic injury prevention.

[34]  Wang Pei-xina,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Non-Comparative Binary Outcomes and Its Solution by Stata , 2012 .

[35]  John Woodrooffe,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL ON MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH PREVENTION , 2006 .

[36]  Irene Isaksson-Hellman,et al.  Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[37]  Paul A. Jennings,et al.  Effect of Using an In-Vehicle Smart Driving Aid on Real-World Driver Performance , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[38]  Alena Erke Effects of electronic stability control (ESC) on accidents: a review of empirical evidence. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[39]  Chao Deng,et al.  A field operational test in China: Exploring the effect of an advanced driver assistance system on driving performance and braking behavior , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[40]  Mercedes Castro-Nuño,et al.  The complex relationship between increases to speed limits and traffic fatalities: Evidence from a meta-analysis , 2019, Safety Science.

[41]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Integrated vehicle-based safety systems: light vehicle field operational test, key findings report. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[42]  David Shinar,et al.  Headway Feedback Improves Intervehicular Distance: A Field Study , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[43]  Byungkyu Park,et al.  The effect of age, gender and roadway environment on the acceptance and effectiveness of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems , 2015 .

[44]  Guoyuan Wu,et al.  Performance Measurement Evaluation Framework and Co-Benefit\/Tradeoff Analysis for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) Applications: A Survey , 2017, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[45]  Erik Rosen,et al.  Autonomous Emergency Braking for Vulnerable Road Users , 2013 .

[46]  Arturo Furones Crespo,et al.  Benefits Assessment of Automatic Brake on Real Pedestrian Collisions , 2016 .

[47]  Irene Isaksson-Hellman,et al.  Traffic Safety Benefit of A Lane Departure Warning System: - A Retrospective Assessment of the Crash Avoidance Effect Based on Real World Crash Data in Sweden - , 2018 .

[48]  Matthew Avery,et al.  AEB Real World Validation Using UK Motor Insurance Claims Data , 2015 .

[49]  Ye Li,et al.  Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[50]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  The Effectiveness of Electronic Stability Control (ESC) in Reducing Real Life Crashes and Injuries , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[51]  Klaus Langwieder,et al.  The effectiveness of primary safety features in passenger cars in Germany , 2005 .

[52]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Fleetwide Safety Benefits of Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems , 2014 .

[53]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Counterfactual simulations applied to SHRP2 crashes: The effect of driver behavior models on safety benefit estimations of intelligent safety systems. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[54]  Anders Lie,et al.  The effectiveness of lane departure warning systems—A reduction in real-world passenger car injury crashes , 2017, Traffic injury prevention.

[55]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Introductory Guide to Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis , 2005 .

[56]  Jessica B. Cicchino,et al.  Effects of lane departure warning on police-reported crash rates. , 2018, Journal of safety research.

[57]  Charles M. Farmer,et al.  Effect of Electronic Stability Control on Automobile Crash Risk , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[58]  Marc Zimmermann,et al.  New approach of accident benefit analysis for rear end collision avoidance and mitigation systems , 2009 .

[59]  Jessica B. Cicchino,et al.  Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[60]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[61]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Quasi-vehicle-trajectory-based real-time safety analysis for expressways , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[62]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Lane Departure Warning and Prevention Systems in the U.S. Vehicle Fleet: Influence of Roadway Characteristics on Potential Safety Benefits , 2016 .

[63]  Yiannis E. Papelis,et al.  An empirical study of the effectiveness of electronic stability control system in reducing loss of vehicle control. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[64]  G J Forkenbrock,et al.  A forward collision warning (FCW) performance evaluation , 2009 .

[65]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  The Practical Effectiveness of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems at Different Roadway Facilities: System Limitation, Adoption, and Usage , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[66]  Stuart Newstead,et al.  Evaluation of electronic stability control effectiveness in Australasia. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[67]  George Yannis,et al.  A meta-analysis of the impacts of operating in-vehicle information systems on road safety , 2019, IATSS Research.

[68]  Daniel Blower,et al.  Advanced Crash Avoidance Technologies (ACAT) Program - Final Report of the Volvo-Ford-UMTRI Project: Safety Impact Methodology for Lane Departure Warning - Method Development and Estimation of Benefits , 2010 .