Valuing environmental factors in cost–benefit analysis using data envelopment analysis

Environmental cost-benefit analysis (ECBA) refers to social evaluation of investment projects and policies that involve significant environmental impacts. Valuation of the environmental impacts in monetary terms forms one of the critical steps in ECBA. We propose a new approach for environmental valuation within ECBA framework that is based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) and does not demand any price estimation for environmental impacts using traditional revealed or stated preference methods. We show that DEA can be modified to the context of CBA by using absolute shadow prices instead of traditionally used relative prices. We also discuss how the approach can be used for sensitive analysis which is an important part of ECBA. We illustrate the application of the DEA approach to ECBA by means of a hypothetical numerical example where a household considers investment to a new sport utility vehicle.

[1]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[2]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[3]  Robert Dorfman,et al.  Why Benefit-Cost Analysis Is Widely Disregarded and What to Do About It , 1996 .

[4]  R. Färe,et al.  An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms—application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities , 1996 .

[5]  William L. Weber,et al.  Productivity Growth and Pollution in State Manufacturing , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  J. Payne,et al.  Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making , 1995 .

[7]  P. Johansson.  Cost-benefit analysis of environmental change , 1994 .

[8]  Marie-Laure Bougnol,et al.  Benefit-cost analysis using data envelopment analysis , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[9]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2005 .

[10]  David Pearce,et al.  An Evaluation of Cost-Benefit Analysis Criteria , 1975 .

[11]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[12]  D. Pearce,et al.  COST - BENEFIT ANALYSIS , 2020 .

[13]  Jeong-Dong Lee,et al.  Estimation of the shadow prices of pollutants with production/environment inefficiency taken into account: a nonparametric directional distance function approach. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  L. Samuelson.  Economic Theory and Experimental Economics , 2005 .

[15]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation , 1996 .

[16]  Lisa Heinzerling,et al.  Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing , 2004 .

[17]  A. K. Dasgupta,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Theory and Practice. , 1973 .

[18]  E. Caldwell.  God's Little Acre , 1933 .

[19]  Thomas P. Holmes,et al.  Attribute-Based Methods , 2003 .

[20]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis in Environmental Valuation: Environmental Performance, Eco-efficiency and Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2004 .

[21]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[22]  M. Cropper,et al.  Environmental Economics: A Survey , 1992 .

[23]  C. Lovell,et al.  One Market, One Number? A Composite Indicator Assessment of EU Internal Market Dynamics , 2005 .

[24]  Suthathip Yaisawarng,et al.  The Effects of Sulfur Dioxide Controls on Productivity Change in the U.S. Electric Power Industry , 1994 .

[25]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[26]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of consumer durables using absolute shadow prices , 2007 .

[27]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[28]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[29]  M. Bell,et al.  Diversity in Organizations , 2006 .

[30]  M. Pauly,et al.  Universal health insurance in the Clinton plan: coverage as a tax-financed public good. , 1994, The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association.

[31]  Robert H. Nelson,et al.  Why existence value should not be used in cost‐benefit analysis , 1992 .

[32]  Lisa Heinzerling,et al.  Pricing the Priceless: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Protection , 2002 .

[33]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[34]  Glenn C. Blomquist,et al.  The Use of Contingent Valuation in Benefit–Cost Analysis , 2006 .

[35]  John Mackenzie,et al.  A Comparison of Contingent Preference Models , 1993 .

[36]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  A Jobs-Based Analysis of Labor Markets , 1995 .

[37]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[38]  M. Common,et al.  Natural resource and environmental economics , 1996 .

[39]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[40]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[41]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[42]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.