Insights into the mechanism of microtubule stabilization by Taxol

The antitumor drug Taxol stabilizes microtubules and reduces their dynamicity, promoting mitotic arrest and cell death. Upon assembly of the α/β-tubulin heterodimer, GTP bound to β-tubulin is hydrolyzed to GDP reaching a steady-state equilibrium between free tubulin dimers and microtubules. The binding of Taxol to β-tubulin in the polymer results in cold-stable microtubules at the expense of tubulin dimers, even in the absence of exogenous GTP. However, there is little biochemical insight into the mechanism(s) by which Taxol stabilizes microtubules. Here, we analyze the structural changes occurring in both β- and α-tubulin upon microtubule stabilization by Taxol. Hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) coupled to liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization MS demonstrated a marked reduction in deuterium incorporation in both β-and α-tubulin when Taxol was present. Decreased local HDX in peptic peptides was mapped on the tubulin structure and revealed both expected and new dimer–dimer interactions. The increased rigidity in Taxol microtubules was distinct from and complementary to that due to GTP-induced polymerization. The Taxol-induced changes in tubulin conformation act against microtubule depolymerization in a precise directional way. These results demonstrate that HDX coupled to liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization MS can be effectively used to study conformational effects induced by small ligands on microtubules. The present study also opens avenues for locating drug and protein binding sites and for deciphering the mechanisms by which their interactions alter the conformation of microtubules and tubulin dimers.

[1]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes , 1999, Proteins.

[2]  K. Weber,et al.  Characterization of the post-translational modifications in tubulin from the marginal band of avian erythrocytes. , 1993, European journal of biochemistry.

[3]  A Roussel,et al.  CRYStallize: a crystallographic symmetry display and handling subpackage in TOM/FRODO. , 1990, Journal of molecular graphics.

[4]  E. Nogales,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent bending flexibility of tubulin regulates microtubule assembly , 2005, Nature.

[5]  Patrick A. Curmi,et al.  Insight into tubulin regulation from a complex with colchicine and a stathmin-like domain , 2004, Nature.

[6]  E. Nogales,et al.  Low resolution structure of microtubules in solution. Synchrotron X-ray scattering and electron microscopy of taxol-induced microtubules assembled from purified tubulin in comparison with glycerol and MAP-induced microtubules. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  R. Himes,et al.  Intrinsically Slow Dynamic Instability of HeLa Cell Microtubules in Vitro * , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  Kenneth H. Downing,et al.  Structure of the αβ tubulin dimer by electron crystallography , 1998, Nature.

[9]  S. Turner,et al.  In Vivo Measurement of Microtubule Dynamics Using Stable Isotope Labeling with Heavy Water , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  P. Matthias,et al.  HDAC‐6 interacts with and deacetylates tubulin and microtubules in vivo , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[11]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Relating molecular flexibility to function: a case study of tubulin. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[12]  G. C. Rogers,et al.  Microtubule motors in mitosis , 2000, Nature.

[13]  T. Toda,et al.  The V260I mutation in fission yeast alpha-tubulin Atb2 affects microtubule dynamics and EB1-Mal3 localization and activates the Bub1 branch of the spindle checkpoint. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[14]  L. Amos,et al.  Focusing-in on microtubules. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[15]  P Wadsworth,et al.  Taxol suppresses dynamics of individual microtubules in living human tumor cells. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[16]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Microtubule polymerization dynamics. , 1997, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[18]  E. Nogales,et al.  Refined structure of alpha beta-tubulin at 3.5 A resolution. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  J. M. de Pereda,et al.  Solution structure of Taxotere-induced microtubules to 3-nm resolution. The change in protofilament number is linked to the binding of the taxol side chain. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[20]  B. Mickey,et al.  Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  Stuart L Schreiber,et al.  Domain-selective small-molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-mediated tubulin deacetylation , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Williams,et al.  End-stabilized microtubules observed in vitro: stability, subunit, interchange, and breakage. , 1992, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[23]  A. Hoenger,et al.  Complex formation with kinesin motor domains affects the structure of microtubules. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  Susan Band Horwitz,et al.  Mechanisms of Taxol resistance related to microtubules , 2003, Oncogene.

[25]  P. Schiff,et al.  Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxol , 1979, Nature.

[26]  R. Himes,et al.  Suppression of microtubule dynamic instability and treadmilling by deuterium oxide. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[27]  M. Gonzalez-Garay,et al.  A β-Tubulin Leucine Cluster Involved in Microtubule Assembly and Paclitaxel Resistance* 210 , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  M. Menéndez,et al.  Thermodynamics of ligand-induced assembly of tubulin. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[30]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Stefan Westermann,et al.  Post-translational modifications regulate microtubule function , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  P. Curmi,et al.  The 4 Å X-Ray Structure of a Tubulin:Stathmin-like Domain Complex , 2000, Cell.

[33]  F. Wang,et al.  Analysis of tubulin isotypes and mutations from taxol-resistant cells by combined isoelectrofocusing and mass spectrometry. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[34]  E. Nogales,et al.  High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule , 1999, Cell.

[35]  D. Botstein,et al.  Dominant-Lethal α-Tubulin Mutants Defective in Microtubule Depolymerization in Yeast , 2001 .

[36]  P. Tittmann,et al.  Surface-decoration of microtubules by human tau. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  E. Nogales,et al.  Tubulin rings: which way do they curve? , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[38]  D. Odde,et al.  Estimates of lateral and longitudinal bond energies within the microtubule lattice , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  R. Himes,et al.  Stabilization of tubulin by deuterium oxide. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[40]  A. Fourest-Lieuvin,et al.  Microtubule regulation in mitosis: tubulin phosphorylation by the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[41]  S. Mani,et al.  Validation of the pharmacodynamics of BMS-247550, an analogue of epothilone B, during a phase I clinical study. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[42]  D. Murphy,et al.  Brain and erythrocyte microtubules from chicken contain different beta-tubulin polypeptides. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.