Self-organization versus top-down planning in the evolution of a city

Interventions of central, top-down planning are serious limitations to the possibility of modelling the dynamics of cities. An example is the city of Paris (France), which during the 19th century experienced large modifications supervised by a central authority, the ‘Haussmann period’. In this article, we report an empirical analysis of more than 200 years (1789–2010) of the evolution of the street network of Paris. We show that the usual network measures display a smooth behavior and that the most important quantitative signatures of central planning is the spatial reorganization of centrality and the modification of the block shape distribution. Such effects can only be obtained by structural modifications at a large-scale level, with the creation of new roads not constrained by the existing geometry. The evolution of a city thus seems to result from the superimposition of continuous, local growth processes and punctual changes operating at large spatial scales.

[1]  L. Mumford.  The City in History , 1961 .

[2]  Alessandro Flammini,et al.  Modeling urban street patterns. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[3]  Michael Batty,et al.  The evolution of cities: Geddes, Abercrombie and the new physicalism , 2009 .

[4]  M. Southworth,et al.  Streets and the Shaping of Towns and Cities , 1996 .

[5]  Stephen Marshall,et al.  街道与形态 (Streets and patterns) , 2004 .

[6]  Vito Latora,et al.  Elementary processes governing the evolution of road networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[7]  P. Krugman,et al.  The Spatial Economy , 1999 .

[8]  V. Latora,et al.  The Network Analysis of Urban Streets: A Primal Approach , 2006 .

[9]  D. Helbing,et al.  Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  D. Reid,et al.  Transforming Paris: The Life and Labors of Baron Haussmann@@@The Nation and Its City: Politics, "Corruption," and Progress in Washington, D.C., 1861-1902 , 1996 .

[11]  P. Haggett.  Network Analysis In Geography , 1971 .

[12]  V. Latora,et al.  Centrality measures in spatial networks of urban streets. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Eric Sandweiss,et al.  BUILT FOR CHANGE: NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHITECTURE IN SAN FRANCISCO , 1987, Landscape Journal.

[14]  A. Venables,et al.  The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade , 1999 .

[15]  H. Stanley,et al.  Modelling urban growth patterns , 1995, Nature.

[16]  Michael Batty,et al.  Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals , 2007 .

[17]  David Levinson,et al.  Topological Evolution of Surface Transportation Networks , 2007, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[18]  Catherine Gloaguen,et al.  Mathematics and morphogenesis of cities: a geometrical approach. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[20]  Michael Batty,et al.  Cities and complexity - understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals , 2007 .

[21]  Patrick Geddes,et al.  Cities in Evolution , 2021 .

[22]  V. Latora,et al.  Structural properties of planar graphs of urban street patterns. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[24]  S. Marshall.  Cities design and evolution , 2008 .

[25]  S. Angel,et al.  The dynamics of global urban expansion , 2005 .

[26]  E. Glaeser.  Cities, Productivity, and Quality of Life , 2011, Science.

[27]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Scaling laws in the spatial structure of urban road networks , 2006 .

[28]  Christophe Claramunt,et al.  Topological Analysis of Urban Street Networks , 2004 .

[29]  David M Levinson,et al.  Measuring the Structure of Road Networks , 2007 .