Supervised dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of complex systems, part 2: Application to risk-informed decision making, practice and results

Abstract One challenge that has received attention in maritime industry is assessing the risk level of dynamic positioning (DP) systems in emergency situations. Statistics from recent years have shown that the risk level of some DP operations is above the industry's risk criteria. Operators have a significant impact on incidents’ consequences by making responsive decisions. In emergencies, one is afforded little time to make a decision. Available risk models are not efficient enough to provide systems’ risk level in a short period of time. In this study, the application of a new supervised methodology to assist decision making in emergencies is proposed. This method significantly reduces the processing and execution time of a system's probabilistic risk assessment models. In this methodology, the most probable failure scenarios are generated using an optimization model. The objective of the optimization model in this study is to find scenarios with the highest occurrence probabilities. The constraints are a system's dynamic simulation and its risk model. The proposed method is applied to three incidents that occurred in the Norwegian offshore sector in previous years. The results show that the model can predict the most probable scenarios with an acceptable accuracy in a very short time.

[1]  Ruhul A. Sarker,et al.  Optimization Modelling: A Practical Approach , 2007 .

[2]  Pawel Dabrowski,et al.  Assessment of the Positioning Accuracy of DGPS and EGNOS Systems in the Bay of Gdansk using Maritime Dynamic Measurements , 2018, Journal of Navigation.

[3]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Analysis of Dynamic Positioning System Accidents and Incidents with Emphasis on Root Causes and Barrier Failures , 2017 .

[4]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Human reliability and the impact of control function allocation in the design of dynamic positioning systems , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Data driven approach to risk management and decision support for dynamic positioning systems , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Daniel Ferreira Cruz,et al.  WSOG and Emergency Disconnection Guidelines , 2017 .

[7]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Supervised Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Complex Systems, Part 1: General Overview , 2021, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  The development and application of the accident dynamic simulator for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants , 1996 .

[9]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future , 2015 .

[10]  S. Swaminathan,et al.  The mathematical formulation for the event sequence diagram framework , 1999 .

[11]  Leandro dos Santos Coelho,et al.  An efficient particle swarm approach for mixed-integer programming in reliability-redundancy optimization applications , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Yadollah Saboohi,et al.  Efficient health monitoring of buildings using failure modes and effects analysis case study: Air handling unit system , 2020 .

[13]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Safety of dynamic positioning operations on mobile offshore drilling units , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Asgeir J. Sørensen,et al.  A survey of dynamic positioning control systems , 2011, Annu. Rev. Control..

[15]  Eilif Pedersen,et al.  Modeling of Generic Offshore Vessel in Crane Operations With Focus on Strong Rigid Body Connections , 2017, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[16]  Roger Skjetne,et al.  Comparison of control design models and observers for dynamic positioning of surface vessels , 2019, Control Engineering Practice.

[17]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 1: Overview of the IDAC Model , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Towards an online risk model for dynamic positioning operations , 2018 .

[19]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Improving safety of DP operations: learning from accidents and incidents during offshore loading operations , 2017 .

[20]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  An Entropy Based Bayesian Network Framework for System Health Monitoring , 2018, Entropy.

[21]  N. O. Siu,et al.  Dynamic event tree analysis method (DETAM) for accident sequence analysis , 1991 .

[22]  Y. Hu,et al.  Event Sequence Diagram Based Safety Critical Event Identification and Sensitive Analysis , 2012 .

[23]  Carol Smidts,et al.  The Event Sequence Diagram framework for dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment , 1999 .

[24]  Mohammad Javad Ketabdari,et al.  Alternative approach for dynamic-positioning thrust allocation using linear pseudo-inverse model , 2019, Applied Ocean Research.

[25]  G. A. Ramadass,et al.  Reliability assessment of multi-megawatt capacity offshore dynamic positioning systems , 2017 .

[26]  Jerzy Herdzik DYNAMIC POSITIONING SYSTEMS DURING EMERGENCY OR UNEXPECTED SITUATIONS , 2013 .

[27]  Yadollah Saboohi,et al.  Efficient performance monitoring of building central heating system using Bayesian Network method , 2019 .