Social and Economic Wellbeing in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin: Building an Enlarged Human Development Indicator

This paper calculates a human Wellbeing Composite Index (WCI) for 42 countries, belonging to the European Economic Space, North Africa and the Middle East, as an alternative to the shortcomings of other well-known measures of socio-economic development (i.e. Gross Domestic Product per head and Human Development Index). To attain this goal, different data envelopment analysis (DEA) models are used as an aggregation tool for seven selected socio-economic variables which correspond to the following wellbeing dimensions: income per capita, environmental burden of disease, income inequality, gender gap, education, life expectancy at birth and government effectiveness. The use of DEA allows avoiding the subjectivity that would be involved in the exogenous determination of weights for the variables included in WCI. The aim is to establish a complete ranking of all countries in the sample, using a three-step process, with the last step consisting in the use of a model that combines DEA and compromise programming, and permits to obtain a set of common weights for all countries in the analysis. The results highlight the distance that still separates Southern Mediterranean countries from the benchmark levels established by some European countries, and also point to the main weaknesses in individual countries’ performance. Nordic countries, plus Switzerland, top the list of best performers, while Mauritania, Libya and Syria appear at the bottom.

[1]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms: A productive efficiency perspective , 1999 .

[2]  Mónica Domínguez-Serrano,et al.  A Gender Wellbeing Composite Indicator: The Best-Worst Global Evaluation Approach , 2011 .

[3]  Jared L. Cohon,et al.  Multiobjective programming and planning , 2004 .

[4]  R. Hausmann,et al.  The global gender gap report 2007 , 2007 .

[5]  Laura D'Andrea Tyson,et al.  The global gender gap report , 2006 .

[6]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[7]  A. Sagar,et al.  The human development index: a critical review , 1998 .

[8]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  P. Murias,et al.  An Economic Wellbeing Index for the Spanish Provinces: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2006 .

[10]  S. M. Hatefi,et al.  A common weight MCDA–DEA approach to construct composite indicators , 2010 .

[11]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996-2008 , 2006 .

[13]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[14]  J. A. Gómez-Limón,et al.  Ranking farms with a composite indicator of sustainability , 2011 .

[15]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Multicriteria decision analysis and environmental economics: An approximation , 1997 .

[17]  Sabina Alkire,et al.  Human Development: Definitions, Critiques, and Related Concepts , 2010 .

[18]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[19]  Akihiro Hashimoto,et al.  Has Livability of Japan Gotten Better for 1956–1990?: a Dea Approach , 1997 .

[20]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[21]  Antonio Jurado,et al.  Construction and Evolution of a Multidimensional Well-Being Index for the Spanish Regions , 2012 .

[22]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Weighting and Aggregation in Composite Indicator Construction: a Multiplicative Optimization Approach , 2010 .

[23]  C. Romero,et al.  In search of a natural systems sustainability index , 2004 .

[24]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Eduardo González,et al.  The Importance of the Geographic Level of Analysis in the Assessment of the Quality of Life: The Case of Spain , 2011 .

[27]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  Meghnad Desai,et al.  Human development:Concepts and measurement , 1991 .

[29]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .

[30]  C. Kao,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[31]  Tanja Srebotnjak Environmental Performance Index , 2014 .

[32]  J. Pastor,et al.  Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries , 1995 .

[33]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[34]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[35]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[36]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators , 2007 .

[37]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[38]  Geraldo da Silva e Souza,et al.  Efficiency and sustainability assessment for a group of farmers in the Brazilian Amazon , 2009, Ann. Oper. Res..

[39]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to Fortune's best cities , 2001 .

[40]  Rolf Färe,et al.  An Economic Approach to Achievement and Improvement Indexes , 2001 .