Buckling analysis of open top tanks subjected to harmonic settlement

Abstract This work addresses the buckling behavior of the open top tanks subjected to harmonic settlement. First of all, the buckling behavior and the critical harmonic settlement of an open top tank for various wave numbers are investigated. The results present that buckling occurs on the upper shell for a small wave number, while it changes to other places of the shell for large wave numbers. Also, with the wave number increasing, the buckling point is closer to the base of the shell. Besides, for the original tank, the critical harmonic settlement decreases greatly when the wave number is small, while the critical harmonic settlement decreases slightly when the wave number is large. Then, the parametric studies for the buckling behavior of the open top tank are conducted, composed of the height-to-radius ( h / r ) ratio and the radius-to-thickness ( r / t ) ratio. Regarding the h / r ratio, for a certain wave number, the critical harmonic settlement versus the h / r ratio is monotonically decreasing. Also, with the wave number increasing, the critical harmonic settlement decreases more and more slightly. Regarding the r / t ratio, for a certain wave number, the critical harmonic settlement versus the r / t ratio is monotonically decreasing. Moreover, with the increasing wave number, the critical harmonic settlement decreases more and more slightly. Finally, the buckling results of the open top tank are compared with that of the conical roof tank. The results illustrate that the open top tank can hold a larger harmonic settlement than the conical roof tank for no restraint from the roof for a small wave number. However, for large wave numbers, there is a small difference in settlement sustaining capacity for open top tanks and conical roof tanks.

[1]  Zhao Yang,et al.  Floating-roof steel tanks under harmonic settlement: FE parametric study and design criterion , 2006 .

[2]  Luis A. Godoy,et al.  Wind pressures and buckling of cylindrical steel tanks with a conical roof , 2005 .

[3]  Tao Jin,et al.  Buckling analysis of large scale oil tanks with a conical roof subjected to harmonic settlement , 2012 .

[4]  H. Kamyab,et al.  Displacements in Oil Storage Tanks Caused by Localized Differential Settlement , 1991 .

[5]  J. M. Rotter,et al.  Buckling of thin metal shells , 2004 .

[6]  S. C. Palmer,et al.  Stresses in Storage Tanks Caused by Differential Settlement , 1994 .

[7]  Z. Malik,et al.  Ovalization of cylindrical tanks as a result of foundation settlement , 1977 .

[8]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  Strategies for Tracing the Nonlinear Response Near Limit Points , 1981 .

[9]  Jiang Jun-rong Case Study of Earth Undercutting Method Applied to Correct Unevenly Settled Foundation of 20 000 m3 Vertical Steel Storage Tank , 2011 .

[10]  E. Riks An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems , 1979 .

[11]  M. Crisfield An arc‐length method including line searches and accelerations , 1983 .

[12]  J. Michael Rotter,et al.  Axially compressed cylindrical shells with local settlement , 2005 .

[13]  S C Palmer Structural Effects of Foundation Tilt on Storage Tanks , 1992 .

[14]  Yang Zhao,et al.  Buckling strength of cylindrical steel tanks under harmonic settlement , 2010 .

[15]  J. Michael Rotter,et al.  Buckling of Thin Cylindrical Shells Under Locally Elevated Compressive Stresses , 2011 .

[16]  P. Ansourian,et al.  Harmonic settlement effects on uniform and tapered tank shells , 1998 .

[17]  S. C. Palmer,et al.  Analysis of Displacements and Stresses in Oil Storage Tanks Caused by Differential Settlement , 1989 .

[18]  James M. Duncan,et al.  Distortion of Steel Tanks Due to Settlement of Their Walls , 1989 .

[19]  Luis A. Godoy,et al.  Localized support settlements of thin-walled storage tanks , 2003 .

[20]  J. M. Rotter,et al.  Nonlinear response and buckling of cylindrical tanks due to foundation settlement , 2003 .