Modeling Micro-Level Crime Location Choice: Application of the Discrete Choice Framework to Crime at Places

Discrete choice recently emerged as a new framework for analyzing criminal location decisions, but has thus far only been used to study the choice amongst large areas like census tracts. Because offenders also make target selection decisions at much lower levels of spatial aggregation, the present study analyzes the location choices of offenders at detailed spatial resolutions: the average unit of analysis is an area of only 18 residential units and 40 residents. This article reviews the discrete choice and spatial choice literature, justifies the use of geographic units this small, and argues that because small spatial units depend strongly on their environment, models are needed that take into account spatial interdependence. To illustrate these points, burglary location choice data from the Netherlands are analyzed with discrete choice models, including the spatial competition model.

[1]  A. Girling,et al.  Modelling police success in catching burglars in the act , 2001 .

[2]  Richard Block,et al.  WHERE OFFENDERS CHOOSE TO ATTACK: A DISCRETE CHOICE MODEL OF ROBBERIES IN CHICAGO* , 2009 .

[3]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[4]  R. Sampson,et al.  The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms, and Development , 2006 .

[5]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Disaggregate Behavioural Travel Demand's RUM Side , 2001 .

[6]  Danielle M. Reynald,et al.  Do Social Barriers Affect Urban Crime Trips? The Effects of Ethnic and Economic Neighbourhood Compositions on the Flow of Crime in The Hague, The Netherlands , 2008 .

[7]  Daniel P. Mears,et al.  NO COMMUNITY IS AN ISLAND: THE EFFECTS OF RESOURCE DEPRIVATION ON URBAN VIOLENCE IN SPATIALLY AND SOCIALLY PROXIMATE COMMUNITIES , 2006 .

[8]  I. Altman,et al.  Handbook of environmental psychology , 1987 .

[9]  Peter K. B. St. Jean,et al.  Pockets of Crime: Broken Windows, Collective Efficacy, and the Criminal Point of View , 2007 .

[10]  D. Wolf,et al.  Retire to where? A discrete choice model of residential location , 2001 .

[11]  D. Hensher,et al.  Using stated response choice data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models , 1993 .

[12]  Patricia L. Brantingham,et al.  Crime Attractors, Generators and Detractors: Land Use and Urban Crime Opportunities , 2008 .

[13]  S. Bushway,et al.  Using State Child Labor Laws to Identify the Causal Effect of Youth Employment on Deviant Behavior and Academic Achievement , 2008, Journal of quantitative criminology.

[14]  R. Dubin,et al.  Spatial Autocorrelation: A Primer , 1998 .

[15]  Michael Ozog,et al.  Modeling Overnight Recreation Trip Choice: Application of a Repeated Nested Multinomial Logit Model , 1999 .

[16]  W. Bernasco.  A SENTIMENTAL JOURNEY TO CRIME: EFFECTS OF RESIDENTIAL HISTORY ON CRIME LOCATION CHOICE* , 2010 .

[17]  Wim Bernasco,et al.  Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in geographic criminology , 2009 .

[18]  D. McFadden.  Disaggregate Behavioral Travel Demand's RUM Side A 30-Year Retrospective , 2000 .

[19]  S. Bushway,et al.  Trajectories of Crime at Places: A Longitudinal Study of Street Segments in the City of Seattle , 2004 .

[20]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[21]  Modelling Crime Flow between Neighbourhoods in Terms of Distance and of Intervening Opportunities , 2008 .

[22]  Tomoki Nakaya,et al.  Hierarchical Destination Choice and Spatial Interaction Modelling: A Simulation Experiment , 2001 .

[23]  Pamela Wilcox,et al.  GUARDIANSHIP IN CONTEXT: IMPLICATIONS FOR BURGLARY VICTIMIZATION RISK AND PREVENTION* , 2008 .

[24]  P. Zarembka.  Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[25]  Mark D. Uncles,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1987 .

[26]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Sampling of Alternatives for Route Choice Modeling , 2009 .

[27]  Arthur Getis,et al.  Reflections on spatial autocorrelation , 2007 .

[28]  Pingzhao Hu,et al.  An empirical test of the competing destinations model , 2002, J. Geogr. Syst..

[29]  R. Barker.  Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior , 1968 .

[30]  David W. S. Wong.  The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) , 2004 .

[31]  Wim Bernasco,et al.  Co‐offending and the choice of target areas in burglary , 2006 .

[32]  Strategische misdaadanalyse en stedelijke criminaliteit. Een toepassing van de rationele keuzebenadering op stedelijke criminaliteitspatronen en het gedrag van daders, toegespitst op het delict woninginbraak , 1996 .

[33]  W. Bernasco,et al.  How Do Residential Burglars Select Target Areas?: A New Approach to the Analysis of Criminal Location Choice , 2005 .

[34]  H. Elffers,et al.  Do physical barriers affect urban crime trips? The effects of a highway, a railroad, a park or a canal on the flow of crime in The Hague , 2010 .

[35]  C. Kubrin,et al.  Structural Covariates Of Homicide Rates: Does Type Of Homicide Matter? , 2003 .

[36]  M. Charlton,et al.  Quantitative geography : perspectives on spatial data analysis by , 2001 .

[37]  W. Tobler.  A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[38]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Modeling the choice continuum: an integrated model of residential location, auto ownership, bicycle ownership, and commute tour mode choice decisions , 2011 .

[39]  Ken Pease,et al.  Offender as Forager? A Direct Test of the Boost Account of Victimization , 2009 .

[40]  Ralph B. Taylor,et al.  Land use, physical deterioration, resident-based control, and calls for service on urban streetblocks , 1998 .

[41]  Ralph B. Taylor.  Social Order and Disorder of Street Blocks and Neighborhoods: Ecology, Microecology, and the Systemic Model of Social Disorganization , 1997 .

[42]  Patrick R. Gartin,et al.  Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place , 1989 .

[43]  Timothy Coupe,et al.  DAYLIGHT AND DARKNESS TARGETING STRATEGIES AND THE RISKS OF BEING SEEN AT RESIDENTIAL BURGLARIES , 2006 .

[44]  Wim Bernasco,et al.  EFFECTS OF ATTRACTIVENESS, OPPORTUNITY AND ACCESSIBILITY TO BURGLARS ON RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY RATES OF URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS , 2003 .

[45]  A S Fotheringham,et al.  Some Theoretical Aspects of Destination Choice and Their Relevance to Production-Constrained Gravity Models , 1983 .

[46]  B. Boots,et al.  Spatial choice modelling: new opportunities to incorporate space into substitution patterns , 2004 .

[47]  Martin A. Andresen.  Crime Measures and the Spatial Analysis of Criminal Activity , 2006 .

[48]  Timothy J. Fik,et al.  Hierarchical interaction: The modeling of a competing central place system , 1988 .

[49]  C. Nee,et al.  THE ROLE OF CUES IN SIMULATED RESIDENTIAL BURGLARYA Preliminary Investigation , 1988 .

[50]  Sudip Chattopadhyay,et al.  The effectiveness of McFaddens’s nested logit model in valuing amenity improvement , 2000 .

[51]  S. Fotheringham,et al.  Modelling spatial choice: a review and synthesis in a migration context , 2002 .

[52]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[53]  D. Oberwittler,et al.  Why Small Is Better: Advancing the Study of the Role of Behavioral Contexts in Crime Causation , 2009 .

[54]  B N Boots,et al.  Incorporating the effects of spatial structure in discrete choice models of migration. , 1988, Journal of regional science.

[55]  Paul Wiles.  The 'Road to Nowhere': The evidence for traveling criminals: Home Office research study 207: (454302008-001) , 2000 .

[56]  Nancy G. La Vigne,et al.  Mapping an Opportunity Surface of Residential Burglary , 2001 .

[57]  K. Train.  Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People , 1998 .

[58]  J. Ratcliffe,et al.  A Micro-Spatial Analysis of the Demographic and Criminogenic Environment of Drug Markets in Philadelphia , 2007 .

[59]  P. Wikström,et al.  The Explanation of Crime: Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime , 2006 .

[60]  C. Coulton,et al.  Mapping Residents' Perceptions of Neighborhood Boundaries: A Methodological Note , 2001, American journal of community psychology.

[61]  A. Fotheringham,et al.  Spatial Competition and Agglomeration in Urban Modelling , 1985 .

[62]  Robert D. Baller,et al.  STRUCTURAL COVARIATES OF U.S. COUNTY HOMICIDE RATES: INCORPORATING SPATIAL EFFECTS* , 2001 .

[63]  J. Clare,et al.  Formal Evaluation of the Impact of Barriers and Connectors on Residential Burglars' Macro-Level Offending Location Choices , 2009 .

[64]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  Domestic Burglary Repeats and Space-Time Clusters , 2005 .

[65]  Michael Tonry,et al.  The Oxford handbook of crime and public policy , 2011 .

[66]  Robert Haining,et al.  Exploring Offence Statistics in Stockholm City Using Spatial Analysis Tools , 2001 .

[67]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Territoriality and residential crime: a conceptual framework. , 1982 .

[68]  M. Felson.  Crime and nature , 2006 .

[69]  P. Legendre.  Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[70]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Effect of Sampling of Alternatives in Discrete Choice Models , 2004 .

[71]  Inge Thorsen,et al.  A Competing Destinations Approach to Modeling Commuting Flows: A Theoretical Interpretation and An Empirical Application of the Model , 2000 .

[72]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Recognition memory performance and residential burglary , 1992 .

[73]  A. Liska,et al.  EXTENDING SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY: MODELING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN COHESION, DISORDER, AND FEAR* , 2001 .

[74]  W. S. Robinson.  Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. , 1950, International journal of epidemiology.

[75]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods and their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions , 1999 .

[76]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  The spatial analysis of activity stop generation , 2002 .

[77]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence , 2001 .

[78]  Henk Elffers,et al.  Analysing neighbourhood influence in criminology , 2003 .

[79]  Fang Zhao,et al.  Geographically Stratified Importance Sampling for the Calibration of Aggregated Destination Choice Models for Trip Distribution , 2005 .

[80]  Brent Snook,et al.  Serial murderers' spatial decisions: factors that influence crime location choice , 2005 .

[81]  Steven F. Messner,et al.  Not ‘Islands, Entire of Themselves’: Exploring the Spatial Context of City-level Robbery Rates , 2008, Journal of quantitative criminology.

[82]  A S Fotheringham,et al.  A New Set of Spatial-Interaction Models: The Theory of Competing Destinations † , 1983 .

[83]  Elizabeth R. Groff,et al.  Where the Action Is at Places: Examining Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Juvenile Crime at Places Using Trajectory Analysis and GIS , 2009 .

[84]  T. S. Smith,et al.  Inverse Distance Variations for the Flow of Crime in Urban Areas , 1976 .

[85]  Randolph W. Hall,et al.  Handbook of transportation science , 1999 .

[86]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Choice set formation for destination choice modelling , 1992 .

[87]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Criminal Expertise and Offender Decision Making: An Experimental Study of the Target Selection Process in Residential Burglary , 1995 .

[88]  Steven F. Messner,et al.  A Multilevel Analysis of the Risk of Household Burglary in the City of Tianjin, China , 2007 .

[89]  Brent Snook,et al.  Individual differences in distance travelled by serial burglars , 2004 .

[90]  Trevor Bennett,et al.  Identifying, explaining, and targeting burglary ‘hot spots’ , 1995 .

[91]  Wim Bernasco,et al.  FORAGING STRATEGIES OF HOMO CRIMINALIS : LESSONS FROM BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY , 2009 .

[92]  W. R. Smith,et al.  FURTHERING THE INTEGRATION OF ROUTINE ACTIVITY AND SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORIES: SMALL UNITS OF ANALYSIS AND THE STUDY OF STREET ROBBERY AS A DIFFUSION PROCESS , 2000 .