Lower extremity joint kinetics and lumbar curvature during squat and stoop lifting

BackgroundIn this study, kinematics and kinetics of the lower extremity joint and the lumbar lordosis during two different symmetrical lifting techniques(squat and stoop) were examined using the three-dimensional motion analysis.MethodsTwenty-six young male volunteers were selected for the subjects in this study. While they lifted boxes weighing 5, 10 and 15 kg by both squat and stoop lifting techniques, their motions were captured and analyzed using the 3D motion analysis system which was synchronized with two forceplates and the electromyographic system. Joint kinematics was determined by the forty-three reflective markers which were attached on the anatomical locations based on the VICON Plug-in-Gait marker placement protocol. Joint kinetics was analyzed by using the inverse dynamics. Paired t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the differences of variables between two techniques, and among three different weights. Correlation coefficient was calculated to explain the role of lower limb joint motion in relation to the lumbar lordosis.ResultsThere were not significant differences in maximum lumbar joint moments between two techniques. The hip and ankle contributed the most part of the support moment during squat lifting, and the knee flexion moment played an important role in stoop lifting. The hip, ankle and lumbar joints generated power and only the knee joint absorbed power in the squat lifting. The knee and ankle joints absorbed power, the hip and lumbar joints generated power in the stoop lifting. The bi-articular antagonist muscles' co-contraction around the knee joint during the squat lifting and the eccentric co-contraction of the gastrocnemius and the biceps femoris were found important for maintaining the straight leg during the stoop lifting. At the time of lordotic curvature appearance in the squat lifting, there were significant correlations in all three lower extremity joint moments with the lumbar joint. Differently, only the hip moment had significant correlation with the lumbar joint in the stoop lifting.ConclusionIn conclusion, the knee extension which is prominent kinematics during the squat lifting was produced by the contributions of the kinetic factors from the hip and ankle joints(extensor moment and power generation) and the lumbar extension which is prominent kinematics during the stoop lifting could be produced by the contributions of the knee joint kinetic factors(flexor moment, power absorption, bi-articular muscle function).

[1]  Warren P. Lombard,et al.  The Action of Two-Joint Muscles , 1903 .

[2]  W. P. Lombard,et al.  THE MECHANICAL EFFECTS PRODUCED BY THE CONTRACTION OF INDIVIDUAL MUSCLES OF THE THIGH OF THE FROG , 1907 .

[3]  C. H. Page,et al.  Units and Dimensions in Physics , 1952 .

[4]  Arun Garg,et al.  Stoop or Squat: A Biomechanical and Metabolic Evaluation , 1979 .

[5]  D. Winter,et al.  Overall principle of lower limb support during stance phase of gait. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  S Gracovetsky,et al.  Function of the spine. , 1986, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[7]  A Luttmann,et al.  Biomechanical analysis and assessment of lumbar stress during load lifting using a dynamic 19-segment human model. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[8]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[9]  H M Toussaint,et al.  Efficiency and effectiveness of stoop and squat lifting at different frequencies. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[10]  A Garg,et al.  Prevention strategies and the low back in industry. , 1992, Occupational medicine.

[11]  M. Adams,et al.  Influence of lumbar and hip mobility on the bending stresses acting on the lumbar spine. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  J. Harlaar,et al.  Two strategies of transferring from sit-to-stand; the activation of monoarticular and biarticular muscles. , 1994, Journal of Biomechanics.

[13]  Simon M. Hsiang,et al.  Low back pain (LBP) and lifting technique — A review , 1997 .

[14]  L. Yahia,et al.  Coordination between the lumbar spine lordosis and trunk angle during weight lifting. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  N Zheng,et al.  Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  D H Duplessis,et al.  Effect of semi-rigid lumbosacral orthosis use on oxygen consumption during repetitive stoop and squat lifting. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[17]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  Robin Burgess-Limerick Squat, stoop, or something in between? , 1999 .

[19]  A. Hof On the interpretation of the support moment. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[20]  S. McGill,et al.  Changes in lumbar lordosis modify the role of the extensor muscles. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Yi-Lang Chen,et al.  Changes in lifting dynamics after localized arm fatigue , 2000 .

[22]  J. Irrgang,et al.  Biomechanical considerations for rehabilitation of the knee. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Spontaneous transitions in the coordination of a whole body task. , 2001, Human movement science.

[24]  Stuart M. McGill,et al.  Low Back Disorders: Evidence-Based Prevention and Rehabilitation , 2002 .

[25]  Leon Straker,et al.  Evidence to support using squat, semi-squat and stoop techniques to lift low-lying objects , 2003 .

[26]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking: part II: lessons from dynamical simulations and clinical implications. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[27]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Occupational Training Program for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[28]  S. Muncer,et al.  The causes of low back pain: a network analysis. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[29]  Karen Hudes Low Back Disorders: Evidence Based Prevention and Rehabilitation , 2007 .

[30]  E. Berton,et al.  Influence of additional load on the moments of the agonist and antagonist muscle groups at the knee joint during closed chain exercise. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.