Sustainability assessment of renewable power and heat generation technologies

Rationalisation of consumption, more efficient energy usage and a new energy structure are needed to be achieved in order to shift the structure of energy system towards sustainability. The required energy system is among others characterised by intensive utilisation of renewable energy sources (RES). RES technologies have their own advantages and disadvantages. Nevertheless, for the strategic planning there is a great demand for the comparison of RES technologies. Furthermore, there are additional functions of RES utilisation expected beyond climate change mitigation, e.g. increment of employment, economic growth and rural development. The aim of the study was to reveal the most beneficial RES technologies with special respect to sustainability. Ten technologies of power generation and seven technologies of heat supply were examined in a multi-criteria sustainability assessment frame of seven attributes which were evaluated based on a choice experiment (CE) survey. According to experts the most important characteristics of RES utilisation technologies are land demand and social impacts i.e. increase in employment and local income generation. Concentrated solar power (CSP), hydropower and geothermal power plants are favourable technologies for power generation, while geothermal district heating, pellet-based non-grid heating and solar thermal heating can offer significant advantages in case of heat supply.

[1]  Hongzhi Guan,et al.  A Traffic Mode Choice Model for the Bus User Groups based on SP and RP Data , 2013 .

[2]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany , 2013 .

[3]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete , 2009 .

[4]  A. Muthukrishnan,et al.  The effect of physical possession on preference for product warranty , 2013 .

[5]  José Ramón San Cristóbal,et al.  A multi criteria data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the efficiency of the Renewable Energy technologies , 2011 .

[6]  Halldór Ármannsson,et al.  Environmental aspects of geothermal energy utilization , 2003 .

[7]  Ning Jia,et al.  A combined framework for modeling the evolution of traveler route choice under risk , 2013 .

[8]  A. Bergmann,et al.  Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments , 2006 .

[9]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  Indicators to support environmental sustainability of bioenergy systems , 2011 .

[10]  Kim Swales,et al.  The Importance of Revenue Sharing for the Local Economic Impacts of a Renewable Energy Project: A Social Accounting Matrix Approach , 2011 .

[11]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[12]  Allison M. Borchers,et al.  Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? A contingent choice experiment , 2007 .

[13]  Fumitaka Kurauchi,et al.  Generation and calibration of transit hyperpaths , 2013 .

[14]  Ortwin Renn.  Social assessment of waste energy utilization scenarios , 2003 .

[15]  K. Train,et al.  Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices , 2008 .

[16]  Albino Prada,et al.  Generating electricity with forest biomass: Consistency and payment timeframe effects in choice experiments , 2012 .

[17]  A. Scolobig,et al.  Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool , 2012 .

[18]  Alberto Longo,et al.  The Internalization of Externalities in the Production of Electricity: Willingness to Pay for the Attributes of a Policy for Renewable Energy , 2006 .

[19]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[20]  A. Wokaun,et al.  Assessing customer preferences for hydrogen-powered street sweepers: A choice experiment , 2012 .

[21]  Angeliki N. Menegaki,et al.  A social marketing mix for renewable energy in Europe based on consumer stated preference surveys , 2012 .

[22]  Manfred Fischedick,et al.  Public attitudes towards and demand for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles: A review of the evidence and methodological implications , 2010 .

[23]  Mario Ragwitz,et al.  A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries , 2011 .

[24]  Vladimir Strezov,et al.  Sustainability considerations for electricity generation from biomass , 2010 .

[25]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Integrated assessment and energy analysis : Quality assurance in multi-criteria analysis of sustainability , 2006 .

[26]  T. Tsoutsos,et al.  Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies , 2005 .

[27]  Pablo del Río,et al.  An empirical analysis of the impact of renewable energy deployment on local sustainability , 2009 .

[28]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[29]  Dennis L. Meadows,et al.  Limits to growth : the 30-year update , 2004 .

[30]  Yung-Chi Shen,et al.  An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology , 2010 .

[31]  S. Yoo,et al.  Willingness to pay for renewable energy investment in Korea: A choice experiment study , 2010 .

[32]  J. Gil,et al.  Assessing the impact of a Christmas advertisement campaign on Catalan wine preference using Choice Experiments , 2012, Appetite.

[33]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation , 1993 .

[34]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Sustainability-guided promotion of renewable electricity generation , 2005 .

[35]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[36]  R. Clift,et al.  Developing a sustainability framework for the assessment of bioenergy systems , 2007 .

[37]  Bob Frame,et al.  Integrating valuation and deliberation: the purposes of sustainability assessment , 2011 .

[38]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[39]  Frank Lupi,et al.  Valuing energy policy attributes for environmental management: Choice experiment evidence from a research institution , 2011 .

[40]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[41]  A. Menegaki.  Valuation for renewable energy: A comparative review , 2008 .

[42]  J. Phillips.  Evaluating the level and nature of sustainable development for a geothermal power plant , 2010 .

[43]  Azucena Gracia,et al.  Can renewable energy be financed with higher electricity prices? Evidence from a Spanish region , 2012 .

[44]  Taraneh Sowlati,et al.  A multicriteria approach to evaluate district heating system options , 2010 .

[45]  Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis,et al.  Economic valuation in Web surveys; A review of the state of the art and best practices , 2013 .

[46]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay , 2010 .

[47]  Danièle Revel,et al.  IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[48]  Christine Rösch,et al.  Sustainability assessment of energy technologies: towards an integrative framework , 2011 .

[49]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  Multi-impact evaluation of new medium and large hydropower plants in Portugal centre region , 2005 .

[50]  K. Ahrens.  AN ENERGY POLICY FOR EUROPE , 1974 .

[51]  M. Ollikainen,et al.  Valuation of environmental and societal trade-offs of renewable energy sources , 2013 .

[52]  Petros A. Pilavachi,et al.  Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2009 .

[53]  Annette Evans,et al.  Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies , 2009 .

[54]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[55]  P. Balogh,et al.  Interpretation of sustainability in the utilization of renewable energy sources , 2011 .

[56]  Bosko Josimovic,et al.  The strategic environmental impact assessment of electric wind energy plants: Case study ‘Bavanište’ (Serbia) , 2010 .

[57]  Mihály Dombi.  A környezeti hatások értékelésének lehetősége ökoszisztéma-szolgáltatások alapján , 2012 .

[58]  David Hoyos,et al.  The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments , 2010 .

[59]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity options for the UK , 2012 .