The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm

The Desired Sensation Level (DSL) Method was revised to support hearing instrument fitting for infants, young children, and adults who use modern hearing instrument technologies, including multichannel compression, expansion, and multimemory capability. The aims of this revision are to maintain aspects of the previous versions of the DSL Method that have been supported by research, while extending the method to account for adult-child differences in preference and listening requirements. The goals of this version (5.0) include avoiding loudness discomfort, selecting a frequency response that meets audibility requirements, choosing compression characteristics that appropriately match technology to the user's needs, and accommodating the overall prescription to meet individual needs for use in various listening environments. This review summarizes the status of research on the use of the DSL Method with pediatric and adult populations and presents a series of revisions that have been made during the generation of DSL v5.0. This article concludes with case examples that illustrate key differences between the DSL v4.1 and DSL v5.0 prescriptions.

[1]  P J Blamey,et al.  Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. , 2001, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.

[2]  W A Cole,et al.  The Audioscan RM500 Speechmap/DSL Fitting System , 1998, Trends in amplification.

[3]  M W Skinner,et al.  Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1983, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[4]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  H Müsch,et al.  On loudness at threshold. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Mary Pat Moeller,et al.  The importance of high-frequency audibility in the speech and language development of children with hearing loss. , 2004, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[8]  Susan Scollie,et al.  Predictive Validity of a Procedure for Pediatric Hearing Instrument Fitting , 1999 .

[9]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[10]  H J McDermott,et al.  Preferred listening levels: the effect of background noise for moderate-to-profoundly hearing impaired aid users , 2000, Scandinavian audiology.

[11]  Sheila Moodie,et al.  The DSL Method for Pediatric Hearing Instrument Fitting: Historical Perspective and Current Issues , 2005, Trends in amplification.

[12]  Haggard Mp,et al.  Forms of binaural summation and the implications of individual variability for binaural hearing aids. , 1982 .

[13]  Todd A Ricketts,et al.  The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P. Stelmachowicz,et al.  Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  J S Gravel,et al.  Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[16]  G Keidser,et al.  Comparing Loudness Normalization (IHAFF) with Speech Intelligibility Maximization (NAL-NL1) when Implemented in a Two-Channel Device , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[17]  T C Liu,et al.  Loudness discomfort levels in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss. , 2000, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[18]  R J Nozza,et al.  Infant-adult differences in unmasked thresholds for the discrimination of consonant-vowel syllable pairs. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[19]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  E Villchur.  A Different Approach to the Noise Problem of the Hearing Impaired. , 1993, American journal of audiology.

[21]  R J Nozza,et al.  Infant speech-sound discrimination in noise. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Laurie Hanin.  Amplification Considerations for the Young Infant with Hearing Loss , 1999 .

[23]  M P Haggard,et al.  Forms of binaural summation and the implications of individual variability for binaural hearing aids. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[24]  R C Seewald,et al.  Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: aided speech perception measures. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[25]  J. Hall,et al.  Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  P Allen,et al.  Multidimensional scaling of complex sounds by school-aged children and adults. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[28]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. II. Experienced users, fitted unilaterally , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[29]  Sheila Moodie,et al.  Clinical Protocols for Hearing Instrument Fitting in the Desired Sensation Level Method , 2005, Trends in amplification.

[30]  R J Nozza,et al.  Infant speech-sound discrimination testing: effects of stimulus intensity and procedural model on measures of performance. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  R M Cox,et al.  A Structured Approach to Hearing Aid Selection , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[32]  A F Snik,et al.  Hearing-aid fitting in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Comparison of prescription rules. , 1995, Scandinavian audiology.

[33]  L E Humes.  Dimensions of hearing aid outcome. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[34]  Susan D. Scollie,et al.  Prescriptive Procedures for Infants and Children , 2005 .

[35]  Susan D Scollie,et al.  Evaluation of Electroacoustic Test Signals I: Comparison with Amplified Speech , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[36]  M. P. Moeller,et al.  Longitudinal Study of FM System Use in Nonacademic Settings: Effects on Language Development , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[37]  Kevin J Munro,et al.  The effect of speech presentation level on measurement of auditory acclimatization to amplified speech. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  B E Walden,et al.  Examination of two issues concerning functional gain measurements. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[39]  Karolina Smeds.  Is Normal or Less Than Normal Overall Loudness Preferred by First-Time Hearing Aid Users? , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[40]  W. Olsen,et al.  Average Speech Levels and Spectra in Various Speaking/Listening Conditions: A Summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) Report. , 1998, American journal of audiology.

[41]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids , 1999 .

[42]  L L Elliott,et al.  Children's understanding of monosyllabic nouns in quiet and in noise. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  H. Dillon,et al.  Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[44]  R M Cox,et al.  A Review of Past Research on Changes in Hearing Aid Benefit over Time , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[45]  R C Seewald,et al.  Ear level recordings of the long-term average spectrum of speech. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[46]  R M Cox,et al.  Composite speech spectrum for hearing and gain prescriptions. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[47]  R C Seewald,et al.  Effects Of Test Procedure On Individual Loudness Functions , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[48]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Bandwidth effects on children's perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[49]  Jonathan O Parsons,et al.  Comparison of an ‘intuitive’ NHS hearing aid prescription method with DSL 4.1 targets for amplification: Comparación de un metodo “intuitivo” de prescripción de auxiliares auditivos en el NHS, con las metas de amplificación DSL 4.1 , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[50]  J Bamford,et al.  Trial of a two-channel hearing aid (low-frequency compression-high-frequency linear amplification) with school age children. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[51]  Richard Seewald,et al.  Effect of Output Limiting Levels upon the Speech Perception Skills of Congenitally Hearing Impaired Adolescents , 1999 .

[52]  Andrea L Pittman,et al.  Aided Perception of /s/ and /z/ by Hearing-Impaired Children , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[53]  R C Seewald,et al.  The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  P. Allen,et al.  The role of level, spectral, and temporal cues in children's detection of masked signals. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  R C Seewald,et al.  Comparison of Linear Gain and Wide Dynamic Range Compression Hearing Aid Circuits II: Aided Loudness Measures , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[56]  R M Cox,et al.  Distribution of short-term rms levels in conversational speech. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  J S Gravel,et al.  Assessing growth of loudness in children by cross-modality matching. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[58]  L L Elliott,et al.  Children's pure-tone detection. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  S Gatehouse,et al.  A re-examination of the Carhart effect. , 1982, British journal of audiology.

[60]  Fred H. Bess.  Amplification for Infants and Children With Hearing Loss , 1996 .

[61]  Brian C J Moore.  Testing the concept of softness imperception: loudness near threshold for hearing-impaired ears. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  A F Snik,et al.  Measured and calculated insertion gains in young children. , 1995, British journal of audiology.

[63]  H Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' procedure for selecting the saturation sound pressure level of hearing aids: theoretical derivation. , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[64]  R C Seewald,et al.  Preferred listening levels of children who use hearing aids: comparison to prescriptive targets. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[65]  S. Nittrouer.  Learning to perceive speech: how fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[67]  P. Stelmachowicz,et al.  Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[68]  H. K. Dunn,et al.  Statistical Measurements on Conversational Speech , 1940 .

[69]  Mary Florentine,et al.  Growth of Loudness in Listeners with Cochlear Hearing Losses: Recruitment Reconsidered , 2002, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[70]  R A Bentler,et al.  Effect of spectral shaping and content on loudness discomfort. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[71]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  B C Moore,et al.  Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally , 2001, British journal of audiology.

[73]  George A. Lindley,et al.  Fitting Wide Dynamic Range Compression Hearing AidsDSL [i/o], the IHAFF Protocol, and FIG6 , 1997 .

[74]  Phillip Dermody,et al.  Auditory Localisation by Hearing-Impaired Persons Using Binaural In-The-Ear Hearing Aids , 1975 .

[75]  Robyn M. Cox,et al.  Accuracy of Predicted Ear Canal Speech Levels Using the VIOLA Input/Output‐Based Fitting Strategy , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[76]  Frederic L. Wightman,et al.  Individual differences in auditory capability among preschool children. , 1992 .

[77]  K W Berger.  Gain requirements of conductive hearing losses. , 1980, British journal of audiology.

[78]  A F Snik,et al.  Hearing aid fitting of preschool and primary school children. An evaluation using the insertion gain measurement. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology.

[79]  G G Browning,et al.  Hearing disability and hearing aid benefit related to type of hearing impairment. , 1990, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[80]  A Boothroyd.  Auditory development of the hearing child. , 1997, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[81]  F. Wightman,et al.  Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[82]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Comparison of discomfort levels obtained with pure tones and multitone complexes. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[83]  R J Nozza,et al.  Reliability and validity of infant speech-sound discrimination-in-noise thresholds. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[84]  D. Markle,et al.  Hearing Aids , 1936, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[85]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Age-related changes on a children's test of sensory-level speech perception capacity. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[86]  K J Munro,et al.  Are clinical measurements of uncomfortable loudness levels a valid indicator of real-world auditory discomfort? , 1998, British journal of audiology.

[87]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[88]  T W Picton,et al.  Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[89]  D Wigney,et al.  Comparison of severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children's amplification preferences with the NAL-RP and the DSL 3.0 prescriptions. , 1997, Scandinavian audiology.

[90]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Hearing Loss in Children and Adults: Audiometric Configuration, Asymmetry, and Progression , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[91]  Laurel Christensen.  A Comparison of Three Hearing-Aid Sound-Processing Strategies in a Multiple-Memory Hearing Aid for Adolescents , 1999 .

[92]  Bruce A Schneider,et al.  Children's use of semantic cues in degraded listening environments. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[93]  Mead C. Killion.  The SIN report: Circuits haven't solved the hearing‐in‐noise problem , 1997 .

[94]  R M Cox,et al.  The Contour Test of Loudness Perception , 1997, Ear and hearing.