Evaluation of the service quality of container ports by importance-performance analysis

The present study applied importance-performance analysis (IPA) to investigate the relationship between the importance level and satisfaction of port service quality and to enable port authorities to draw port managerial and operational policies for improving service quality. This IPA approach is based on the port service quality characteristics drawn by the Kano two-dimensional quality model, and examines the Singapore, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Busan, and Kaohsiung ports from the viewpoints of 15 container shipping lines deploying container ships at the above ports. The results demonstrate that the shipping lines were most satisfied with the Singapore port, while the Shanghai and Busan ports had a lower satisfaction level than the others. The IPA matrixes of the five ports confirm that, from the viewpoint of resource allocation efficiency, resources should be shifted from quadrant D to quadrant A to improve overall performance of service attributes. Therefore, port managers have to 'keep up the good work' regarding these attributes. Terminal operators can use the results to develop port strategies improving port service quality, to design better service quality control systems, and to capture more container cargoes in the fierce inter-port competition in Asia.

[1]  S. Hollenhorst,et al.  Use of importance-performance analysis to evaluate state park cabins: the case of the West Virginia state park system. , 1992 .

[2]  Haemoon Oh,et al.  Revisiting importance–performance analysis , 2001 .

[3]  Jon M. Hawes,et al.  Using importance-performance analysis to develop health care marketing strategies. , 1985, Journal of health care marketing.

[4]  John A. Martilla,et al.  Importance-Performance Analysis , 1977 .

[5]  Kelly C. Strong,et al.  Measuring Service Quality For Strategic Planning And Analysis In Service Firms , 2011 .

[6]  D. Bacon.  A Comparison of Approaches to Importance-Performance Analysis , 2003 .

[7]  Myung-shin Ha,et al.  A comparison of service quality at major container ports: implications for Korean ports , 2003 .

[8]  Nigel Poole,et al.  Quality assurance in the maritime port logistics chain: the case of Valencia, Spain , 1998 .

[9]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  Importance-performance analysis revisited: the role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction , 2003 .

[10]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Supply chain performance in transport logistics: An assessment by service providers , 2003 .

[11]  Jerry J. Vaske,et al.  Enhancing Importance-Performance Analysis Through Segmentation , 2002 .

[12]  Weijaw Deng,et al.  Using a revised importance–performance analysis approach: The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism , 2007 .

[13]  Innocent C. Ogwude,et al.  Service quality measurements in ports of a developing economy: Nigerian ports survey , 2004 .

[14]  Peter Bernard Marlow,et al.  Measuring lean ports performance , 2003 .

[15]  Young-Tae Chang,et al.  Overview of interport competition: Issues and methods , 2007 .

[16]  Lars Witell,et al.  Two Decades of Using Kano's Theory of Attractive Quality: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[17]  Alvin C. Burns,et al.  GENERATING MARKETING STRATEGY PRIORITIES BASED ON RELATIVE COMPETITIVE POSITION , 1986 .

[18]  Nigel Slack,et al.  The Importance‐Performance Matrix as a Determinant of Improvement Priority , 1994 .

[19]  Angelos Pantouvakis,et al.  Port-Service Quality Dimensions and Passenger Profiles: An Exploratory Examination and Analysis , 2006 .

[20]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  The factor structure of customer satisfaction , 2002 .

[21]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance–performance analysis , 2004 .

[22]  A. Dolinsky,et al.  Adding a competitive dimension to importance-performance analysis: an application to traditional health care systems. , 1991, Health marketing quarterly.

[23]  James H. Myers.  Measuring Customer Satisfaction: Hot Buttons and Other Measurement Issues , 2000 .

[24]  Athanasios A. Pallis,et al.  Port Economics, Policy and Management: Review of an Emerging Research Field , 2010 .

[25]  Callistus Ibe,et al.  A Comparative Assessment of Service Quality Perspectives and Satisfaction in Ports: Evidence from Nigeria , 2009 .

[26]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment , 1998 .

[27]  I. C. Ogwude,et al.  Service quality and satisfaction measurements in Nigerian ports: an exploration , 2007 .

[28]  R. Asariotis,et al.  Review of Maritime Transport, 2008 , 2008 .

[29]  C Berger,et al.  KANO’S METHODS FOR UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMER-DEFINED QUALITY , 1993 .

[30]  Marta Frasquet,et al.  Benchmarking the port services: a customer oriented proposal , 2004 .

[31]  Dermot O'sulliva.  DSM High-Performance Fiber Attracts Growing Interest: Fabrics made from fiber, spun from ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, are claimed to be 40% stronger than those from para-aramids , 1991 .

[32]  Karin Weber,et al.  Meeting planners' perceptions of hotel-chain practices and benefits: An importance-performance analysis , 2000 .

[33]  Michael J. Showalter,et al.  The Performance-Importance Response Function: Observations and Implications , 1999 .