Effective soil-stiffness validation: Shaker excitation of an in-situ monopile foundation

In an attempt to decrease the modelling uncertainty associated with the soil-structure interaction of large-diameter monopile foundations, a hydraulic shaker was used to excite a real-sized, in-situ monopile foundation in stiff, sandy soil in a near-shore wind farm. The response in terms of natural frequency and damping of a pile-only system is significantly more influenced by the soil than a full offshore wind turbine structure, and therefore ensures a higher degree of certainty regarding the assessment of the soil reaction. Steady-state vibration amplitudes with frequencies between 1 and 9 Hz were retrieved from strain gauges vertically spaced along the embedded pile, and accelerometers attached to the top of the pile and to the shaker. The measured response is used to validate an effective 1D stiffness method, which is applied as a smart initial guess for a model-based identification of the effective soil-structure interaction properties in terms of stiffness, damping and soil inertia. The performance of the stiffness method is compared to the currently employed p-y stiffness design method. While the effective stiffness method seems to overestimate the actual low-frequency stiffness with about 20%, the p-y method appears to underestimate this stiffness with 140%. The assumption of linear soil behaviour for most of the occurring pile displacements is shown to be acceptable. A damping ratio of 20% (critical) is identified as effective soil damping for the monopile, which is estimated to correspond to a 0.14% damping ratio contribution from the soil for the full structure. The unique measurement setup yielded a ‘first-off’ opportunity to validate a soil-structure interaction model for a rigidly behaving pile. We have shown that indeed such a pile reacts stiffer than predicted by the p-y curve method, and that its response can be modeled more accurately with our recently developed effective stiffness method.

[1]  Ricardo Dobry,et al.  Horizontal Response of Piles in Layered Soils , 1984 .

[2]  Michele Jamiolkowski,et al.  Evaluation of Relative Density and Shear Strength of Sands from CPT and DMT , 2003 .

[3]  Milos Novak,et al.  Soil-pile interaction in horizontal vibration , 1977 .

[4]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Comparing Sources of Damping of Cross-Wind Motion , 2009 .

[5]  Federico Pisanò,et al.  Transient response of offshore wind turbines on monopiles in sand: role of cyclic hydro–mechanical soil behaviour , 2017 .

[6]  Ignatius Po Lam,et al.  Seismic Design for Highway Bridge Foundations , 1984 .

[7]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  p-y-ẏ curves for dynamic analysis of offshore wind turbine monopile foundations , 2016 .

[8]  Arnold Verruijt,et al.  An Introduction to Soil Dynamics , 2010 .

[9]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[10]  Varun,et al.  A simplified model for lateral response of large diameter caisson foundations—Linear elastic formulation , 2009 .

[11]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[12]  K. Terzaghi,et al.  EVALUATION OF COEFFICIENTS OF SUBGRADE REACTION , 1955 .

[13]  Tuncer B. Edil,et al.  ESTIMATING SOIL/PILE SET-UP , 2003 .

[14]  M.G.L. Ogno,et al.  Identifying Structural Parameters of an Offshore Wind Turbine using Operational Modal Analysis , 2014 .

[15]  Mahmoud El-Kafafy,et al.  Monitoring resonant frequencies and damping values of an offshore wind turbine in parked conditions , 2014 .

[16]  W. G. Versteijlen Estimation of the Vibration Decrement of an Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structure Caused by its Interaction with Soil , 2011 .

[17]  O. Rhersellah Validity of Identified Modal Parameters based on Rotor-Stop Tests of Offshore Wind Turbines , 2013 .

[18]  Lidija Zdravković,et al.  Field testing of large diameter piles under lateral loading for offshore wind applications , 2015 .

[19]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Cross-wind modal properties of offshore wind turbines identified by full scale testing , 2013 .

[20]  Fabrizio Gara,et al.  Dynamic response of a near-shore pile to lateral impact load , 2012 .

[21]  B. Lehane,et al.  Interpretation difficulties of pile set-up in sand , 2015 .

[22]  Jan-Willem van Wingerden,et al.  Statistical Evaluation of the Identified Structural Parameters of an idling Offshore Wind Turbine , 2016 .

[23]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Effects of soil–structure interaction on real time dynamic response of offshore wind turbines on monopiles , 2014 .

[24]  W. G. Versteijlen,et al.  Assessing the small-strain soil stiffness for offshore wind turbines based on in situ seismic measurements , 2014 .

[25]  Dan Kallehave,et al.  Optimization of monopiles for offshore wind turbines , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[26]  Anand Natarajan,et al.  Identification of support structure damping of a full scale offshore wind turbine in normal operation , 2015 .

[27]  Steven L. Kramer,et al.  Dynamic Tests of Pipe Pile in Saturated Peat , 1993 .

[28]  Wout Weijtjens,et al.  CLASSIFYING RESONANT FREQUENCIES AND DAMPING VALUES OF AN OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE ON A MONOPILE FOUNDATION FOR DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS , 2014 .

[29]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Nonlinear response of single piles under lateral inertial and seismic loads , 1996 .

[30]  Bart Peeters,et al.  Full-scale modal wind turbine tests: comparing shaker excitation with wind excitation , 2011 .

[31]  J. H. Atkinson,et al.  Experimental determination of stress–strain–time characteristics in laboratory and in situ tests. , 1991 .

[32]  Christian LeBlanc Bakmar Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures: Selected topics in the field of geotechnical engineering , 2009 .

[33]  W. G. Versteijlen,et al.  A method for identification of an effective Winkler foundation for large-diameter offshore wind turbine support structures based on in-situ measured small-strain soil response and 3D modelling , 2016 .

[34]  Milos Novak,et al.  Resistance of soil to a horizontally vibrating pile , 1977 .

[35]  Farrel Zwerneman,et al.  Insights into Using the 22nd Edition of API RP 2A Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms - Working Stress Design , 2012 .

[36]  Michael W. O'Neill,et al.  Measured Lateral Response of Mass on Single Pile in Clay , 1986 .

[37]  L. Reese,et al.  Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Sand , 1974 .

[38]  Leland M. Kraft,et al.  Dynamic characteristics of lateral load‐deflection relationships of flexible piles , 1981 .

[39]  H. Matlock Correlation for Design of Laterally Loaded Piles in Soft Clay , 1970 .