Framework for asynchronous discussion design decisions: applied principles from special issue authors

After a discussion of the state of both misaligned and informative online and distance education research, the authors in this special issue (hereafter called the collective) extract evidence-based principles about strategies that work. Both are addressed in this article. First, their criticisms centered on the value of comparative research. Those discussions are compared to debates by the International Board of Standards for Training Performance and Instruction (ibstpi). Second, to summarize and synthesize the evidence-based principles on interactions of online distance learners with content, peers and instructors, I offer a framework for planning, developing, and executing online distance education learning activities. The guidelines from the collective are organized within this framework for making asynchronous discussion design decisions. Finally, a redesign of an existing online distance education course exemplifies how these evidence based principles may be applied in a real example.

[1]  David W. Johnson,et al.  An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning , 2009 .

[2]  Eva Mary Bures,et al.  Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[3]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[4]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  Interaction and the online distance classroom: Do instructional methods effect the quality of interaction? , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[5]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Distance education research: a review of the literature , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[6]  P. Pintrich A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[7]  B. Bloom Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[8]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Student-content interactions in online courses: the role of question prompts in facilitating higher-level engagement with course content , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[9]  Linda Bol,et al.  Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education environments , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[10]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[11]  John D. W. Andrews,et al.  The V erbal Structure of Teacher Questions: Its Impact on Class Discussion , 1980 .

[12]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[13]  Kevin F. Collis,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy , 1977 .

[14]  Online Learner Competencies: Results of a Worldwide Validation Study , 2011 .

[15]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[16]  B. Zimmerman Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .

[17]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Instructor Competencies: Standards for Face-to-Face, Online, and Blended Settings , 2004 .