Evaluating the difference between the normalized difference vegetation index and net primary productivity as the indicators of vegetation vigor assessment at landscape scale

Both the net primary productivity (NPP) and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) are commonly used as indicators to characterize vegetation vigor, and NDVI has been used as a surrogate estimator of NPP in some cases. To evaluate the reliability of such surrogation, here we examined the quantitative difference between NPP and NDVI in their outcomes of vegetation vigor assessment at a landscape scale. Using Landsat ETM+ data and a process model, the Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Simulator, NPP distribution was mapped at a resolution of 90 m, and total NDVI during the growing season was calculated in Heihe River Basin, Northwest China in 2002. The results from a comparison between the NPP and NDVI classification maps show that there existed a substantial difference in terms of both area and spatial distribution between the assessment outcomes of these two indicators, despite that they are strongly correlated. The degree of difference can be influenced by assessment schemes, as well as the type of vegetation and ecozone. Overall, NDVI is not a good surrogate of NPP as the indicators of vegetation vigor assessment in the study area. Nonetheless, NDVI could serve as a fairish surrogate indicator under the condition that the target region has low vegetation cover and the assessment has relatively coarse classification schemes (i.e., the class number is small). It is suggested that the use of NPP and NDVI should be carefully selected in landscape assessment. Their differences need to be further evaluated across geographic areas and biomes.

[1]  H. Lieth Modeling the Primary Productivity of the World , 1975 .

[2]  H. Odum,et al.  Primary Productivity of the Biosphere , 1978, Ecological Studies.

[3]  Michel M. Verstraete,et al.  Defining desertification: A review , 1986 .

[4]  S. Running,et al.  A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes , 1988 .

[5]  Timothy G. F. Kittel,et al.  Regional Analysis of the Central Great Plains , 1991 .

[6]  G. Kohlmaier,et al.  Modelling the seasonal CO2 uptake by land vegetation using the global vegetation index , 1991 .

[7]  B. Reed,et al.  Satellite assessment of drought impact on native plant communities of southeastern New Mexico, U.S.A. , 1993 .

[8]  A. McGuire,et al.  Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production , 1993, Nature.

[9]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  Evaluation of the performance of various vegetation indices to retrieve vegetation cover from AVHRR data , 1994 .

[10]  T. Hobbs,et al.  The use of NOAA-AVHRR NDVI data to assess herbage production in the arid rangelands of Central Australia , 1995 .

[11]  J. Chen,et al.  A process-based boreal ecosystem productivity simulator using remote sensing inputs , 1997 .

[12]  H. Mooney,et al.  Modeling the Exchanges of Energy, Water, and Carbon Between Continents and the Atmosphere , 1997, Science.

[13]  T. Carlson,et al.  On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index , 1997 .

[14]  J. Paruelo,et al.  ANPP ESTIMATES FROM NDVI FOR THE CENTRAL GRASSLAND REGION OF THE UNITED STATES , 1997 .

[15]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  R. Tateishi,et al.  Relationships between percent vegetation cover and vegetation indices , 1998 .

[17]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications , 1999 .

[18]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): overview and key results , 1999 .

[19]  Torbjörn Rydberg,et al.  Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: an example from Sweden , 1999 .

[20]  Jing Chen,et al.  Net primary productivity following forest fire for Canadian ecoregions , 2000 .

[21]  J. Ni,et al.  Synthesis and analysis of biomass and net primary productivity in Chinese forests , 2001 .

[22]  J. C. Winslow,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 3-2001 Mapping Weekly Rangeland Vegetation Productivity Using MODIS Algorithms , 2018 .

[23]  César A. Salinas-Zavala,et al.  Interannual variability of NDVI in northwest Mexico. Associated climatic mechanisms and ecological implications , 2002 .

[24]  M. Tamura,et al.  Integrating remotely sensed data with an ecosystem model to estimate net primary productivity in East Asia , 2002 .

[25]  Josef Cihlar,et al.  Net primary productivity mapped for Canada at 1-km resolution , 2002 .

[26]  Osvaldo E. Sala,et al.  PATTERNS AND CONTROLS OF PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN THE PATAGONIAN STEPPE: A REMOTE SENSING APPROACH† , 2002 .

[27]  M. Vincini,et al.  Multitemporal evaluation of topographic normalization methods on deciduous forest TM data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Pan Jian-jun Soil Available Water Capacity and it's Empirical and Statistical Models -with s Special Reference to Black Soils in Northeast China , 2003 .

[29]  Philippe Sands,et al.  United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa, 17 June 1994 , 2004 .

[30]  Brent N. Holben,et al.  Accuracy of the AVHRR vegetation index as a predictor of biomass, primary productivity and net CO2 flux , 1989, Vegetatio.

[31]  A. Millward,et al.  Physical influences of landscape on a large-extent ecological disturbance: the northeastern North American ice storm of 1998 , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  F. Maselli Monitoring forest conditions in a protected Mediterranean coastal area by the analysis of multiyear NDVI data , 2004 .

[33]  E. Lambin,et al.  Dynamic Causal Patterns of Desertification , 2004 .

[34]  C. Tucker,et al.  North American vegetation patterns observed with the NOAA-7 advanced very high resolution radiometer , 1985, Vegetatio.

[35]  Qijiang Zhu,et al.  Spatial distribution of net primary productivity and evapotranspiration in Changbaishan Natural Reserve, China, using Landsat ETM+ data , 2004 .

[36]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[37]  John Tenhunen,et al.  Application of a geographically‐weighted regression analysis to estimate net primary production of Chinese forest ecosystems , 2005 .

[38]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Native vegetation cover thresholds associated with species responses , 2005 .

[39]  A. Vrieling Satellite remote sensing for water erosion assessment: A review , 2006 .

[40]  E. Rodríguez,et al.  A Global Assessment of the SRTM Performance , 2006 .

[41]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Effects of thematic resolution on landscape pattern analysis , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[42]  W. Ju,et al.  Effects of topography on simulated net primary productivity at landscape scale. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  T. Downing,et al.  Global Desertification: Building a Science for Dryland Development , 2007, Science.

[44]  Y. Zhoua,et al.  Observation and simulation of net primary productivity in Qilian Mountain , western China , 2007 .

[45]  S. An,et al.  Assessing the impact of urbanization on regional net primary productivity in Jiangyin County, China. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[46]  W. Ju,et al.  Net primary productivity of China's terrestrial ecosystems from a process model driven by remote sensing. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[47]  Stephen D. Prince,et al.  Mapping land degradation by comparison of vegetation production to spatially derived estimates of potential production , 2008 .

[48]  Zhang Yao-zong Game Analysis on Water Supply and Water Resources Utilization in the Middle Reaches of the Heihe River Basin , 2008 .

[49]  Shilong Piao,et al.  Quantifying the response of forest carbon balance to future climate change in Northeastern China: Model validation and prediction , 2009 .