Design and Impact of a Teacher Training Course, and Attitude Change Concerning Educational Robotics

Current initiatives and laboratories concerning Educational Robotics (ER) are often not based on strong pedagogical backgrounds. Additionally, they are carried out by inadequately trained teachers, and are not evaluated properly in terms of effectiveness. Moreover, according to teachers, ER usability is often neglected. The main goal of the present article is to present a training course on ER (Edu.Ro.Co.), grounded in pedagogical insights, and to discuss the results of the course and teacher’s opinion about ER in terms of: (i) teachers’ attitudes and perceptions of using ER; (ii) the potential impact of ER on students’ key competences for lifelong learning; and (iii) strengths and weaknesses of ER. These aspects were analysed by means of questionnaires specifically designed by the authors, and administered before and after the training course. A total of 339 teachers attended the training course and 254 completed the questionnaires. The article describes the methodology utilised in the realisation of the course and analyses the questionnaire’s results. In particular, the number of teachers that considered themselves prepared to apply ER significantly improved after the training course. ER is considered by teachers an important tool for the improvement of students’ motivation, planning skills, team working, problem solving and creativity development. Finally, the results from questionnaires indicate that teachers consider ER, a method that improves team-working abilities and motivation in the students. In contrast, the main disadvantage is the cost of the robotic kits. Based on these results, new directions for future research in ER are discussed.

[1]  Alexandros Potamianos,et al.  Affective Lexicon Creation for the Greek Language , 2016, LREC.

[2]  Steve Higgins,et al.  The assessment of metacognition in children aged 4–16 years: a systematic review , 2017 .

[3]  Prashant Doshi,et al.  Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[4]  John Hattie,et al.  Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning, 1st Edition , 2012 .

[5]  Tom McKlin,et al.  Sneaking in through the back door: introducing k-12 teachers to robot programming , 2014, SIGCSE.

[6]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[7]  Edoardo Datteri,et al.  The Game of Science: An Experiment in Synthetic Roboethology with Primary School Children , 2016, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[8]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Pedagogical Uses of Thymio II: How Do Teachers Perceive Educational Robots in Formal Education? , 2016, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[9]  Adem Karahoca,et al.  Robotics teaching in primary school education by project based learning for supporting science and technology courses , 2011, WCIT.

[10]  Abdulkafi Albirini,et al.  Teachers' attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  New Pathways into Robotics: Strategies for Broadening Participation , 2008 .

[12]  F. Manganello Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? , 2010 .

[13]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Nonverbal Immediacy as a Characterisation of Social Behaviour for Human–Robot Interaction , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[14]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Involving and training public school teachers in using robotics for education , 2012, 2012 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[15]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Marina Fridin,et al.  Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[18]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations 1 , 2013 .

[19]  Emanuele Menegatti,et al.  Introducing robotics to teachers and schools: experiences from the TERECoP project , 2010 .

[20]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Materials for Enabling Hands-On Robotics and STEM Education , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Semantic Scientific Knowledge Integration.

[21]  W. Clayton Allen,et al.  Overview and Evolution of the ADDIE Training System , 2006 .

[22]  Antonio Calvani,et al.  Come fare un progetto didattico, Gli errori da evitare , 2015 .

[23]  Kate Walsh,et al.  Teacher Prep Review: A Review of the Nation's Teacher Preparation Programs - Executive Summary , 2013 .

[24]  E. Skinner,et al.  Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. , 1993 .

[25]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation , 2004 .

[26]  Adam V. Maltese,et al.  Eyeballs in the Fridge: Sources of early interest in science , 2010 .

[27]  Robert Bogue,et al.  The future of robotics in Europe , 2014, Ind. Robot.

[28]  Jean Piaget,et al.  To Understand is to Invent: The Future of Education , 1973 .

[29]  Silvia Micheletta John Hattie, Visible Learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London & New York: Routledge (2009). John Hattie, Visible Learning for teachers. Maximizing impact on learning. London & New York: Routledge (2012). , 2013 .

[30]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[31]  Michael L. Anderson Embodied Cognition: A field guide , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[32]  Brant G. Miller,et al.  Supporting Elementary Pre-Service Teachers to Teach STEM Through Place-Based Teaching and Learning Experiences , 2014 .

[33]  Richard S. Prawat,et al.  Teachers' Beliefs about Teaching and Learning: A Constructivist Perspective , 1992, American Journal of Education.

[34]  Arvid Kappas,et al.  Towards Empathic Virtual and Robotic Tutors , 2013, AIED.

[35]  J. Osborne,et al.  Science education in Europe , 2008 .

[36]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[37]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment , 2007 .

[38]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Implementing a Robotics Curriculum in an Early Childhood Montessori Classroom , 2014, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract..

[39]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  A Sociological Contribution to Understanding the Use of Robots in Schools: The Thymio Robot , 2014, ICSR.

[40]  Dimitris Alimisis,et al.  Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges , 2013 .