The effects of splinting periodontally compromised removable partial denture abutments on bone stresses: a three-dimensional finite element study

Background/Purpose Periodontally compromised abutments complicate the treatment plan of distal extension removable partial dentures. The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine if splinting a tooth with reduced bone height to a healthy one is beneficial to the weak one; (2) to investigate fixed splinting of two teeth (the first and second premolars) with various alveolar support levels on bone stress around the periodontal construction according to different crown to root ratios of the periodontally compromised abutment; and (3) to assess the efficiency of splinting in the presence of non-axial loads. Materials and methods Thirteen three-dimensional finite element models were designed that included the mandibular first and second premolars and the surrounding bone. Ten models were similar except for the alveolar bone height around the second premolar that had different amounts of bone resorption of 0-9 mm with splinted teeth. The last three were the same except for the teeth which were not splinted. A vertical force of 25 N was applied to each occlusal surface of the premolars. Finally, von Mises stress was evaluated at three points for all models. In the first stage, the efficiency of splinting was assessed. In the last stage, the effects of non-axial loads were evaluated in the splinted teeth models. Results In stage 1, it was shown that splinting could redirect the stresses to apical areas and prevented crestal bone from increased stress. In stage 2, the findings of von Mises stress in the apical area of the first premolar were almost the same in all models. In the apical area of the second premolar and the alveolar crest area, the bone stress increased when the height of the alveolar bone of the second premolar decreased. Stage 3 revealed that splinted teeth are efficient in carrying non-axial loads. Conclusion Splinting a very weak abutment to an adjacent healthy tooth might not be beneficial. The acceptable crown to root ratio for fixed splinting a weak abutment to an adjacent normal tooth was around 1.65-2.

[1]  H S Yang,et al.  Stress analysis of a cantilevered fixed partial denture with normal and reduced bone support. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  Allahyar Geramy,et al.  Optimization of unilateral overjet management: three-dimensional analysis by the finite element method. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  Alan B. Carr,et al.  McCracken's Removable partial prosthodontics , 1973 .

[4]  H. Petridis,et al.  Periodontal considerations in removable partial denture treatment: a review of the literature. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[5]  C H Wang,et al.  Methods to improve a periodontally involved terminal abutment of a cantilever fixed partial denture--a finite element stress analysis. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Brudvik,et al.  Managing the maxillary partially edentulous patient with extensive anterior tooth loss and advanced periodontal disease using a removable partial denture: a clinical report. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  M. Ash,et al.  Wheeler's Dental Anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion , 1992 .

[8]  M. Simring Splinting; theory and practice. , 1952, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[9]  Jafar Gharechahi,et al.  Finite element method analysis of stress distribution to supporting tissues in a Class IV Aramany removable partial denture (Part II: bone and mucosal membrane). , 2008, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[10]  L A Lang,et al.  Finite element stress analysis on the effect of splinting in fixed partial dentures. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  F. Serio Clinical rationale for tooth stabilization and splinting. , 1999, Dental clinics of North America.

[12]  T. Kanno,et al.  [What prosthodontic therapy should we select for periodontally compromised patients? Part 2: Review of the literature focusing on conventional prosthodontic therapy for periodontally compromised patients and clinical implication (RPD vs FPD vs implant)]. , 2008, Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai zasshi.

[13]  A A Caputo,et al.  Photoelastic analysis of pressure on teeth and bone supporting removable partial dentures. , 1974, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  Y. Igarashi,et al.  Does Removable Partial Denture Quality Affect Individuals’ Oral Health? , 2008, Journal of dental research.

[15]  A A Caputo,et al.  Effects of periodontal support and fixed splinting on load transfer by removable partial dentures. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  L. A. Weinberg,et al.  An evaluation of periodontal splinting. , 1961, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[17]  Min Wei,et al.  [Stress distribution on periodontium of separated removable partial denture assembly]. , 2008, Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology.

[18]  H. E. Charkawi,et al.  Effect of splinting on load distribution of extracoronal attachment with distal extension prosthesis in vitro. , 1996 .

[19]  A. Caputo,et al.  Fixed cantilever splints on teeth with normal and reduced periodontal support. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  Allahyar Geramy,et al.  Finite element analysis of three designs of an implant-supported molar crown. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  N. Lang,et al.  Tooth mobility and the biological rationale for splinting teeth. , 1994, Periodontology 2000.

[22]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with advanced periodontal disease. , 1976, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[23]  A. Čelebić,et al.  The effect of removable partial dentures on periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth. , 2002, Journal of periodontology.

[24]  Allahyar Geramy,et al.  Initial stress produced in the periodontal membrane by orthodontic loads in the presence of varying loss of alveolar bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2002, European journal of orthodontics.

[25]  Serio Fg CLINICAL RATIONALE FOR TOOTH STABILIZATION AND SPLINTING , 1999 .

[26]  Jen-Chyan Wang,et al.  Mechanical interactions of an implant/tooth-supported system under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connections. , 2006, E -journal of dentistry.

[27]  J. Brudvik,et al.  Removable partial denture design using milled abutment surfaces and minimal soft tissue coverage for periodontally compromised teeth: a clinical report. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[28]  J. Lindhe,et al.  A longitudinal study of combined periodontal and prosthetic treatment of patients with advanced periodontal disease. , 1979, Journal of periodontology.

[29]  A Geramy,et al.  Alveolar bone resorption and the center of resistance modification (3-D analysis by means of the finite element method). , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  David R. Cagna,et al.  Stewart's Clinical Removable Partial Prosthodontics , 2003 .

[31]  S. Nyman,et al.  The capacity of reduced periodontal tissues to support fixed bridgework. , 1982, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[32]  A. Caputo,et al.  Maxillary distal-extension removable partial denture abutments with reduced periodontal support. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[33]  T W Korioth,et al.  Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. , 1997, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[34]  A K Aydin,et al.  Stresses induced by different loadings around weak abutments. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[35]  Allahyar Geramy,et al.  Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method. , 2003, Quintessence international.