Biomechanical simulations of the spine deformation process in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from different pathogenesis hypotheses

It is generally recognized that progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) evolves within a self-sustaining biomechanical process involving asymmetrical growth modulation of vertebrae due to altered spinal load distribution. A biomechanical finite element model of normal thoracic and lumbar spine integrating vertebral growth was used to simulate the progression of spinal deformities over 24 months. Five pathogenesis hypotheses of AIS were represented, using an initial geometrical eccentricity (gravity line imbalance of 3 mm or 2° rotation) at the thoracic apex to trigger the self-sustaining deformation process. For each simulation, regional (thoracic Cobb angle, kyphosis) and local scoliotic descriptors (axial rotation and wedging of the thoracic apical vertebra) were evaluated at each growth cycle. The simulated AIS pathogeneses resulted in the development of different scoliotic deformities. Imbalance of 3 mm in the frontal plane, combined or not with the sagittal plane, resulted in the closest representation of typical scoliotic deformities, with the thoracic Cobb angle progressing up to 39° (26° when a sagittal offset was added). The apical vertebral rotation increased by 7° towards the convexity of the curve, while the apical wedging increased to 8.5° (7.3° with the sagittal eccentricity) and this deformity evolved towards the vertebral frontal plane. A sole eccentricity in the sagittal plane generated a non-significant frontal plane deformity. Simulations involving an initial rotational shift (2°) in the transverse plane globally produced relatively small and non-typical scoliotic deformations. Overall, the thoracic segment predominantly was sensitive to imbalances in the frontal plane, although unidirectional geometrical eccentricities in different planes produced three-dimensional deformities at the regional and vertebral levels, and their deformities did not cumulate when combined. These results support the hypothesis of a prime lesion involving the precarious balance in the frontal plane, which could concomitantly be associated with a hypokyphotic component. They also suggest that coupling mechanisms are involved in the deformation process.

[1]  N. Grenier,et al.  The neurocentral vertebral cartilage: Anatomy, physiology and physiopathology , 1989, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[2]  Jacques Vidal,et al.  Mechanical Process and Growth Cartilages; Essential Factors in the Progression of Scoliosis , 1993, Spine.

[3]  R Roaf,et al.  The basic anatomy of scoliosis. , 1966, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  H Labelle,et al.  Progression of Vertebral and Spinal Three-Dimensional Deformities in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Longitudinal Study , 2001, Spine.

[5]  A. White,et al.  Kinematics of the normal spine as related to scoliosis. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  M S Moreland,et al.  Measurement of Axial Rotation of Vertebrae in Scoliosis , 1986, Spine.

[7]  J. F. Katz,et al.  The effects of pressure on epiphyseal growth; the mechanism of plasticity of growing bone. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  R. Duthie,et al.  A new projectional look at articulated scoliotic spines. , 1973, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  H. Frost,et al.  Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 3. The hyaline cartilage modeling problem , 1990, The Anatomical record.

[10]  A. Nachemson The Load on Lumbar Disks in Different Positions of the Body , 1966, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  P. Millner,et al.  Idiopathic scoliosis: biomechanics and biology , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[12]  I A Stokes,et al.  The biomechanics of scoliosis. , 1984, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  R Perdriolle,et al.  Morphology of scoliosis: three-dimensional evolution. , 1987, Orthopedics.

[14]  R A Dickson,et al.  Idiopathic scoliosis in three dimensions. A radiographic and morphometric analysis. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  J. Kitoh,et al.  Etiology of Idiopathic Scoliosis: Computational Study , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  H Labelle,et al.  Three‐dimensional Effect of the Boston Brace on the Thoracic Spine and Rib Cage , 1996, Spine.

[17]  I. Stokes,et al.  Disc and vertebral wedging in patients with progressive scoliosis. , 2001, Journal of spinal disorders.

[18]  H Labelle,et al.  Rib Cage‐Spine Coupling Patterns Involved in Brace Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1997, Spine.

[19]  J. Taylor,et al.  Growth of human intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies. , 1975, Journal of anatomy.

[20]  H Labelle,et al.  Simulation of progressive deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a biomechanical model integrating vertebral growth modulation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Byrd Ja rd Current theories on the etiology of idiopathic scoliosis. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  E. Somerville,et al.  Rotational lordosis; the development of single curve. , 1952, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  R. Dickson,et al.  The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Biplanar spinal asymmetry. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  F Lavaste,et al.  [Geometrical modeling of the spine and the thorax for the biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using the finite element method]. , 1995, Annales de chirurgie.

[25]  E. Morscher,et al.  The relationship between periosteal division and compression or distraction of the growth plate. An experimental study in the rabbit. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  Stuart L. Weinstein,et al.  The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice , 2001 .

[27]  J. Dansereau,et al.  Three-dimensional measurement of wedged scoliotic vertebrae and intervertebral disks , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[28]  I A Stokes,et al.  Three-dimensional osseo-ligamentous model of the thorax representing initiation of scoliosis by asymmetric growth. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  A. Schultz,et al.  Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  M. Moreland Morphological effects of torsion applied to growing bone. An in vivo study in rabbits. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  T. Grivas,et al.  Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. The Nottingham concept. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[32]  C. Rocco The Pediatric Spine I , 1989, Principles of Pediatric Neurosurgery.