Understanding Employee Engagement in Un-Official Projects - A Conceptual Model Based On Psychological Empowerment and Constructive Deviance

Un-official projects resulting from unsanctioned, bottom-up employee initiatives is a phenomenon that can cause serious resource planning problems in IT project portfolio management, such as when resources thought to be available have actually been spent on projects conducted under the radar. At the same time, such project may also give rise to innovative ideas, solutions and software of potentially great benefit to organizations. Previous research has begun to acknowledge and highlight the innovative potential in bottom-up un-official activities, but little is known about why individual professionals engage in un-official projects. We draw on psychological empowerment and constructive deviance theory to explain such engagement, identifying factors fostering empowerment as well as factors moderating whether empowerment translates into unofficial project activities. Our conceptual model contributes to the theoretical discourse on un-official projects and equips practitioners with knowledge that can help them balance the propensity of individuals to engage in un-official activities.

[1]  Claudine Carillo,et al.  [Organizational stress]. , 2011, Soins; la revue de reference infirmiere.

[2]  C. Loch.  Tailoring product development to strategy: case of a European technology manufacturer , 2000 .

[3]  Richard H. Hall,et al.  Organizations: Structure and process , 1977 .

[4]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The experience of powerlessness in organizations , 1989 .

[5]  Danielle E. Warren.  Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations , 2003 .

[6]  Frank Harmsen,et al.  Project Portfolio Management in Practice , 2010, PRET.

[7]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Empowerment—Fad or Fab? A Multilevel Review of the Past Two Decades of Research , 2012 .

[8]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[9]  S. H. Appelbaum,et al.  Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviors: causes, impacts, and solutions , 2007 .

[10]  M. Aiken,et al.  Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. , 1967 .

[11]  P. Eskerod,et al.  Project portfolio management - There's more to it than what management enacts , 2008 .

[12]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio Management in New Product Development: Lessons from the Leaders-I , 1997 .

[13]  Dane K. Peterson.  Deviant Workplace Behavior and the Organization's Ethical Climate , 2002 .

[14]  M. Martinsuo.  Project portfolio management in practice and in context , 2013 .

[15]  J. L. Price,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Measurement , 1975 .

[16]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[17]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Exploring the Role of Un-Enacted Projects in IT Project Portfolio Management , 2012, ICIS.

[18]  Ammon J. Salter,et al.  Going Underground: Bootlegging and Individual Innovative Performance , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares , 2010 .

[20]  G. Spreitzer.  An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace , 1995, American journal of community psychology.

[21]  V. A. Thompson.  Bureaucracy and innovation , 1969 .

[22]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization , 2000 .

[23]  Gretchen M. Spreitzer,et al.  Toward the Construct Definition of Positive Deviance , 2004 .

[24]  R. Kanter.  The Change Masters , 1983 .

[25]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Taking Stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work , 2007 .

[26]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-Item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research , 1993 .

[27]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[28]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[29]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  Threats to Innovation; Roadblocks to Implementation: The Politics of the Productive Process , 1989 .

[30]  Bella Lise Galperin.  Determinants of deviance in the workplace : an empirical examination in Canada and Mexico , 2002 .

[31]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[32]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[33]  Ronald J. Burke,et al.  Uncovering the relationship between workaholism and workplace destructive and constructive deviance: an exploratory study , 2006 .

[34]  B. Posner,et al.  The Leadership Challenge: How To Get Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations. First Edition. The Jossey-Bass Management Series. , 1987 .

[35]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Understanding the Organizational Antecedents of Bottom-up un-Enacted Projects - towards a Conceptual Model Based on Deviance Theory , 2014, ECIS.

[36]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management , 1987 .

[37]  G. John.  An Empirical Investigation of Some Antecedents of Opportunism in a Marketing Channel , 1984 .

[38]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[39]  C. Schriesheim,et al.  Leader–member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. , 1999 .

[40]  A. Bandura.  Human agency in social cognitive theory. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[41]  B. Campbell.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[42]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[43]  Daniel Fürstenau,et al.  Shadow IT Systems: Discerning the Good and the evil , 2014, ECIS.

[44]  S. Courtright,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. , 1993 .

[46]  M. Zimmerman.  Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations , 1995, American journal of community psychology.

[47]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  Information privacy in organizations: empowering creative and extrarole performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  William J. Haga,et al.  A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process , 1975 .

[49]  M. Jeffery,et al.  Best Practices in IT Portfolio Management , 2004 .

[50]  Deborah V. Brazeal.  Managing an entrepreneurial organizational environment: A discriminant analysis of organizational and individual differences between autonomous unit managers and department managers , 1996 .

[51]  M. West,et al.  Innovation at work:psychological perspectives , 1989 .

[52]  John P. Ulhøi,et al.  Employee‐driven innovation: extending the license to foster innovation , 2010 .

[53]  R. H. Franke.  The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement OrganizationThe Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement Organization By LawlerEdward E.III, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1992—371 pages. $29.95 , 1992 .

[54]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination in a work organization. , 1989 .

[55]  R. Cooper,et al.  Benchmarking Best NPD Practices—II , 2004 .

[56]  Mary Ann Hanson,et al.  A Framework for the Study of Relationships between Organizational Characteristics and Organizational Innovation. , 1997 .

[57]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[58]  Khaled Gaaloul,et al.  Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation - Third Working Conference, PRET 2011, Luxembourg-Kirchberg, Luxembourg, September 6, 2011. Proceedings , 2011, PRET.

[59]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[60]  David L. Dodge,et al.  The over‐Negativized conceptualization of deviance: A programmatic exploration , 1985 .

[61]  G. Spreitzer.  Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment , 1996 .

[62]  Chris T. Street,et al.  Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior , 2001 .

[63]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity: A Scale Analysis , 1977 .

[64]  Ahmed S. Ashour,et al.  Leader Influence Through Operant Principles: A Theoretical and Methodological Framework , 1983 .

[65]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[66]  S. Jackson,et al.  A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings , 1985 .

[67]  Seth R. Silver,et al.  Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction , 2004 .

[68]  R. Liden,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support And Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective , 1997 .

[69]  H. Bahrami.  The Emerging Flexible Organization: Perspectives from Silicon Valley , 1992 .

[70]  B. Galperin,et al.  Exploring the Nomological Network of Workplace Deviance: Developing and Validating a Measure of Constructive Deviance , 2012 .

[71]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis , 1982 .

[72]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[73]  R. Daft,et al.  Can Organization Studies Begin to Break Out of the Normal Science Straitjacket? An Editorial Essay , 1990 .

[74]  Peter Kizilos,et al.  Crazy about Empowerment , 1990 .

[75]  B. Galperin,et al.  Constructive deviance : striving toward organizational change in healthcare , 2010 .

[76]  R. Bennett,et al.  A TYPOLOGY OF DEVIANT WORKPLACE BEHAVIORS: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING STUDY , 1995 .