Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study.

OBJECTIVES: To study whether linguistic analysis and changes in information leaflets can improve readability and understanding. DESIGN: Randomised, controlled study. Two information leaflets concerned with trials of drugs for conditions/diseases which are commonly known were modified, and the original was tested against the revised version. SETTING: Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 235 persons in the relevant age groups. MAIN MEASURES: Readability and understanding of contents. RESULTS: Both readability and understanding of contents was improved: readability with regard to both information leaflets and understanding with regard to one of the leaflets. CONCLUSION: The results show that both readability and understanding can be improved by increased attention to the linguistic features of the information.

[1]  P. A. Kelly,et al.  Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms. , 1990, Pediatrics.

[2]  W. Mackillop,et al.  Ethical problems in clinical research: the need for empirical studies of the clinical trials process. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[3]  Mark Hochhauser,et al.  Some overlooked aspects of consent form readability. , 1997, IRB.

[4]  F. Riordan,et al.  How to get patients' consent to enter clinical trials , 1996, BMJ.

[5]  W. L. Martin,et al.  Effects of readability on the impact and recall of written informed consent material. , 1992, Professional psychology, research and practice.

[6]  C. Williams,et al.  Informed consent in European multicentre randomised clinical trials--are patients really informed? , 1994, European journal of cancer.

[7]  K D Hopper,et al.  Readability of informed consent forms for use with iodinated contrast media. , 1993, Radiology.

[8]  M E Mumford,et al.  A descriptive study of the readability of patient information leaflets designed by nurses. , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  D. A. BRUNNING,et al.  European Journal of Cancer , 1966, Nature.

[10]  N. Buller,et al.  Are patient consent forms for research protocols easy to read? , 1992, BMJ.

[11]  S. Wood,et al.  How To Do It: Get patients' consent to enter clinical trials , 1995 .

[12]  J E Sieber,et al.  Empirical studies of ethical issues in research. A research agenda. , 1987, The American psychologist.

[13]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  A History and Theory of Informed Consent , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[14]  R. Rivera,et al.  Evaluating the readability of informed consent forms used in contraceptive clinical trials , 1992, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[15]  V A Arthur,et al.  Written patient information: a review of the literature. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  D. Hammerschmidt,et al.  Institutional Review Board (IRB) review lacks impact on the readability of consent forms for research. , 1992, The American journal of the medical sciences.