Mechanistic flexibility as a conserved theme across 3 billion years of nonhomologous DNA end-joining.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) represent the most deleterious form of DNA damage. Two mechanistically distinctive repair pathways have evolved to mend these breaks in eukaryotes: homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous DNA end-joining (NHEJ) (Lieber et al. 2003). HR is restricted to late S or G2 of the cell cycle, whereas NHEJ can function throughout the cell cycle and is the primary repair pathway for DSBs. NHEJ is also distinctive for the mechanistic flexibility of the nucleases, polymerases, and ligases in eukaryotes (Lieber 2007; Lieber et al. 2007). Initially, NHEJ was thought to be restricted to eukaryotes because the best-studied prokaryote, Escherichia coli, has no ability to join DNA ends (if it did, molecular cloning would have had a different history) (Table 1). Only when bioinformatists discovered a distantly diverged Ku-like gene in diverse prokaryotic genomes did researchers begin to realize the existence of a similar NHEJ pathway in bacteria (Aravind and Koonin 2001; Doherty et al. 2001; d’Adda di Fagagna et al. 2003). The bacterial Ku homolog is suspected to form a homodimer with a conjectured structure similar to the ring-shaped eukaryotic Ku heterodimer (Weller et al. 2002). The gene for an ATP-dependent ligase named LigD was often found to be adjacent to the Ku gene on the bacterial chromosome (Aravind and Koonin 2001; Doherty et al. 2001; Weller and Doherty 2001). This linkage between Ku and an ATP-dependent ligase prompted more extensive studies and later defined a bacterial NHEJ pathway. Table 1. Possible corresponding components between NHEJ in prokaryotes and eukaryotes So why do some but not all bacteria retain this DNA repair pathway? Bacterial NHEJ is nonessential under rapid proliferation conditions because HR is active and a duplicate genome is present to provide homology donors (Pitcher et al. 2007a; Shuman and Glickman 2007). However, those bacteria that retain the NHEJ pathway spend much of their life cycle in stationary phase, at which point HR is not available for DSB repair for lack of homology donors. In addition, in nature, desiccation and dry heat are two naturally occurring physical processes that produce substantial numbers of DSBs in bacteria. Hence, bacterial Ku and LigD are present in bacterial species that often form endospores, because during sporulation, NHEJ is efficient for the DSB repair (Pitcher et al. 2007a). In many bacterial species, unlike the eukaryotic NHEJ ligase IV, LigD is a large, multidomain protein that contains three components within a single polypeptide: a polymerase (POL) domain, a phosphoesterase (PE) domain, and a ligase (LIG) domain (Shuman and Glickman 2007). Therefore, it is tempting to suggest that bacterial Ku and LigD are necessary and sufficient to repair all the DSBs generated in vivo (Della et al. 2004). However, in this issue of Genes & Development, the study by Aniukwu et al. (2008) from the Shuman and Glickman laboratories describes extensive genetic studies combined with in vivo DSB repair analysis in Mycobacterium smegmatis and clearly demonstrates the complexity and flexibility of the NHEJ pathway in bacteria. They uncover a faithful NHEJ pathway specifically for 3′ overhang DSB repair, which is Ku- and LigD-independent. Their results also show that the structure of the broken ends determines the pathway and outcome of the DSB repair.

[1]  M. Glickman,et al.  The pathways and outcomes of mycobacterial NHEJ depend on the structure of the broken DNA ends. , 2008, Genes & development.

[2]  M. Lieber,et al.  The Mechanism of Human Nonhomologous DNA End Joining* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  K. Schwarz,et al.  Flexibility in the order of action and in the enzymology of the nuclease, polymerases, and ligase of vertebrate non-homologous DNA end joining: relevance to cancer, aging, and the immune system , 2008, Cell Research.

[4]  M. Glickman,et al.  Bacterial DNA repair by non-homologous end joining , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[5]  L. Blanco,et al.  Structure of a NHEJ Polymerase-Mediated DNA Synaptic Complex , 2007, Science.

[6]  A. Doherty,et al.  Expression of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ku and Ligase D in Escherichia coli results in RecA and RecB-independent DNA end-joining at regions of microhomology. , 2007, DNA repair.

[7]  N. Brissett,et al.  Nonhomologous end-joining in bacteria: a microbial perspective. , 2007, Annual review of microbiology.

[8]  K. Schwarz,et al.  Single-stranded DNA ligation and XLF-stimulated incompatible DNA end ligation by the XRCC4-DNA ligase IV complex: influence of terminal DNA sequence , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  G. Chu,et al.  Cernunnos/XLF promotes the ligation of mismatched and noncohesive DNA ends , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  S. Shuman,et al.  Characterization of Agrobacterium tumefaciens DNA ligases C and D , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  M. Lieber,et al.  XRCC4:DNA ligase IV can ligate incompatible DNA ends and can ligate across gaps , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[12]  L. Blanco,et al.  Structure and function of a mycobacterial NHEJ DNA repair polymerase. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  S. Shuman,et al.  Nucleotide Misincorporation, 3′-Mismatch Extension, and Responses to Abasic Sites and DNA Adducts by the Polymerase Component of Bacterial DNA Ligase D* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  B. Bertocci,et al.  Nonoverlapping functions of DNA polymerases mu, lambda, and terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase during immunoglobulin V(D)J recombination in vivo. , 2006, Immunity.

[15]  M. Glickman,et al.  Atomic structure and nonhomologous end-joining function of the polymerase component of bacterial DNA ligase D. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A. Tomkinson,et al.  DNA ligases: structure, reaction mechanism, and function. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[17]  A. Doherty,et al.  Domain structure of a NHEJ DNA repair ligase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  S. Shuman,et al.  Novel 3′-Ribonuclease and 3′-Phosphatase Activities of the Bacterial Non-homologous End-joining Protein, DNA Ligase D* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Detlef D. Leipe,et al.  Origin and evolution of the archaeo-eukaryotic primase superfamily and related palm-domain proteins: structural insights and new members , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  M. Glickman,et al.  Mechanism of nonhomologous end-joining in mycobacteria: a low-fidelity repair system driven by Ku, ligase D and ligase C , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[21]  S. Shuman,et al.  A Primer-dependent Polymerase Function of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATP-dependent DNA Ligase (LigD)* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  Yunmei Ma,et al.  A biochemically defined system for mammalian nonhomologous DNA end joining. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[23]  Martin Kühne,et al.  A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[24]  A. Tomkinson,et al.  Mycobacterial Ku and Ligase Proteins Constitute a Two-Component NHEJ Repair Machine , 2004, Science.

[25]  M. Glickman,et al.  Biochemical and Genetic Analysis of the Four DNA Ligases of Mycobacteria* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  Yunmei Ma,et al.  Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[27]  D. Ramsden,et al.  Polymerase Mu Is a DNA-Directed DNA/RNA Polymerase , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  S. Jackson,et al.  The Gam protein of bacteriophage Mu is an orthologue of eukaryotic Ku , 2003, EMBO reports.

[29]  P. Jeggo,et al.  Identification of a DNA Nonhomologous End-Joining Complex in Bacteria , 2002, Science.

[30]  Yunmei Ma,et al.  Hairpin Opening and Overhang Processing by an Artemis/DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Complex in Nonhomologous End Joining and V(D)J Recombination , 2002, Cell.

[31]  A. Doherty,et al.  A family of DNA repair ligases in bacteria? , 2001, FEBS letters.

[32]  J. Walker,et al.  Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair , 2001, Nature.

[33]  E. Koonin,et al.  Prokaryotic homologs of the eukaryotic DNA-end-binding protein Ku, novel domains in the Ku protein and prediction of a prokaryotic double-strand break repair system. , 2001, Genome research.

[34]  S. Jackson,et al.  Identification of bacterial homologues of the Ku DNA repair proteins , 2001, FEBS letters.

[35]  M. Gellert,et al.  DNA binding of Xrcc4 protein is associated with V(D)J recombination but not with stimulation of DNA ligase IV activity , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[36]  K. Schwarz,et al.  DNA ligase IV is essential for V(D)J recombination and DNA double-strand break repair in human precursor lymphocytes. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[37]  T. Lindahl,et al.  A newly identified DNA ligase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in RAD52-independent repair of DNA double-strand breaks. , 1997, Genes & development.

[38]  S. Jackson,et al.  Mammalian DNA double-strand break repair protein XRCC4 interacts with DNA ligase IV , 1997, Current Biology.

[39]  M. Lieber,et al.  Activity of DNA ligase IV stimulated by complex formation with XRCC4 protein in mammalian cells , 1997, Nature.