What You See and What You Get

In a recent contribution to this journal, Munck and Snyder found that many studies suffer from a deficient application of qualitative and quantitative methods. They argue that the combination of small-n and large-n analysis represents a viable method for promoting the production of knowledge. Recently, Evan Lieberman proposed nested analysis as a rigorous approach for comparative research that builds on the complementary strengths of quantitative and qualitative analysis. In this paper, the author examines the methodological potential of nested inference to advance comparative political analysis, arguing that the specific methodological problems of nested designs have not been fully appreciated. It is shown that, under certain circumstances, nothing is gained from a nested analysis. On the contrary, one might lose more than one gains compared to single-method designs. The author suggests specific methodological principles that take these problems into account to make nested analysis fruitful for comparative studies.

[1]  Stephen J. Perez,et al.  Three attitudes towards data mining , 2000 .

[2]  E. Lieberman.  Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa: SHADOWS OF THE PAST: TAX REFORM IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION AND DEMOCRATIZATION , 2003 .

[3]  Rainer Schnell,et al.  Graphisch gestützte Datenanalyse , 1994 .

[4]  J. Gerring,et al.  Social Science Methodology: List of Tables and Figures , 2001 .

[5]  A. A. Iliasu,et al.  IV. The Cobden-Chevalier Commercial Treaty of 1860 , 1971, The Historical Journal.

[6]  John Gerring.  Social Science Methodology: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[7]  Richard Snyder,et al.  Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics , 2007 .

[8]  Joanne Gowa,et al.  Power Politics and International Trade , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[9]  Stephen T. Ziliak,et al.  Size Matters: The Standard Error of Regressions in the American Economic Review , 2004 .

[10]  Ian S. Lustick.  History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[12]  J. Gerring.  Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework , 2001 .

[13]  Nathaniel N. Beck.  Have We Learned in the Past Few Years , 2001 .

[14]  A. Dunham,et al.  The Anglo-French Treaty of Commerce of 1860 and the Progress of the Industrial Revolution in France. , 1971 .

[15]  Visions of Comparative Politics , 2007 .

[16]  Gary King,et al.  When Can History Be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference , 2007 .

[17]  Michael Coppedge,et al.  Thickening Thin Concepts and Theories: Combining Large N and Small in Comparative Politics , 1999 .

[18]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[19]  Evan S. Lieberman,et al.  Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research , 2005, American Political Science Review.