The dimensions of complaint satisfaction: process and outcome complaint satisfaction versus cold fact and warm act complaint satisfaction

There is much empirical evidence showing that the satisfaction of complainants with a company’s response has enormous impact on the customers’ future behaviour. Therefore, it becomes necessary to fully understand the construct of complaint satisfaction. Moreover, recent research provides deep insights into the determinants and consequences of complaint satisfaction. The focus of this article is on the dimensional structure of this construct. On a conceptual basis, two dimensions of complaint satisfaction are differentiated: outcome complaint satisfaction and process complaint satisfaction. The results of an empirical study are presented, demonstrating the effects of both dimensions on overall complaint satisfaction, relationship satisfaction and repurchase intention. Additionally, factor analysis leads to the identification of two factors that can be interpreted as satisfaction dimensions: cold fact complaint satisfaction and warm act complaint satisfaction. Obviously, complainants differentiate between those quality attributes that can be evaluated on the basis of objective facts on the one hand, and those that lead to more emotional reactions.

[1]  C. Boshoff Recovsat: An Instrument to Measure Satisfaction with Transaction-Specific Service Recovery , 1999 .

[2]  Michael A. McCollough,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Customer Satisfaction after Service Failure and Recovery , 2000 .

[3]  S. Kelley,et al.  Perceived justice needs and recovery evaluation: a contingency approach , 2000 .

[4]  Jc Ko de Ruyter,et al.  Customer equity considerations in service recovery: a cross‐industry perspective , 2000 .

[5]  Stephen S. Tax,et al.  The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior , 1997 .

[6]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Customer Reactions to Service Failure and Recovery Encounters , 1998 .

[7]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery , 1999 .

[8]  Hooman Estelami,et al.  Competitive and Procedural Determinants of Delight and Disappointment in Consumer Complaint Outcomes , 2000 .

[9]  Carl L. Saxby,et al.  Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Procedural Justice in a Complaint Context , 2000 .

[10]  T. Andreassen,et al.  What Drives Customer Loyalty with Complaint Resolution? , 1999 .

[11]  W. Bearden,et al.  Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports , 1983 .

[12]  Tracy L. Tuten,et al.  Service recovery: its value and limitations as a retail strategy , 1996 .

[13]  C. Grönroos A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications , 1984 .

[14]  James G. Maxham Service recovery's influence on consumer satisfaction, positive word-of-mouth, and purchase intentions , 2001 .

[15]  Janis L. Miller,et al.  Service recovery: a framework and empirical investigation , 2000 .

[16]  R. Oliver A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[17]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service , 1993 .

[18]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  Defensive Marketing Strategy by Customer Complaint Management: A Theoretical Analysis , 1987 .

[19]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents: , 1990 .

[20]  F. Reichheld Loyalty-based management. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[21]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  What Occurs Once Consumers Complain? A Theoretical Model for Understanding Satisfaction/ Dissatisfaction Outcomes of Complaint Responses , 1991 .

[22]  William O. Bearden,et al.  The role of public and private complaining in satisfaction with problem resolution. , 1985 .

[23]  Jeffrey Blodgett,et al.  A Bayesian Network Model of the Consumer Complaint Process , 2000 .

[24]  Stephen S. Tax,et al.  Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing , 1998 .