Dynamic Models Incorporating Individual Heterogeneity: Utility Evolution in Conjoint Analysis

It has been shown in the behavioral decision making, marketing research, and psychometric literature that the structure underlying preferences can change during the administration of repeated measurements e.g., conjoint analysis and data collection because of effects from learning, fatigue, boredom, and so on. In this research note, we propose a new class of hierarchical dynamic Bayesian models for capturing such dynamic effects in conjoint applications, which extend the standard hierarchical Bayesian random effects and existing dynamic Bayesian models by allowing for individual-level heterogeneity around an aggregate dynamic trend. Using simulated conjoint data, we explore the performance of these new dynamic models, incorporating individual-level heterogeneity across a number of possible types of dynamic effects, and demonstrate the derived benefits versus static models. In addition, we introduce the idea of an unbiased dynamic estimate, and demonstrate that using a counterbalanced design is important from an estimation perspective when parameter dynamics are present.

[1]  M. GuadagniPeter,et al.  A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data , 1983 .

[2]  Tülin Erdem A Dynamic Analysis of Market Structure Based on Panel Data , 1996 .

[3]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  Modeling Dynamic Effects in Repeated-Measures Experiments Involving Preference/Choice: An Illustration Involving Stated Preference Analysis , 2004 .

[4]  Philip Hans Franses,et al.  A dynamic multinomial probit model for brand choice with different long‐run and short‐run effects of marketing‐mix variables , 2000 .

[5]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Order-of-Entry Effects on Consumer Memory and Judgment: An Information Integration Perspective , 1992 .

[6]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  The Emergence of Market Structure in New Repeat-Purchase Categories: The Interplay of Market Share and Retailer Distribution , 2000 .

[7]  Frank R. Kardes,et al.  Persistent Preferences for Product Attributes: The Effects of the Initial Choice Context and Uninformative Experience , 2001 .

[8]  R. Luce,et al.  Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement , 1964 .

[9]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[10]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Thurstonian-Based Analyses: Past, Present, and Future Utilities , 2006, Psychometrika.

[11]  Russell S. Winer,et al.  Modeling and Estimation in Changing Market Environments , 1983 .

[12]  C. LiechtyJohn,et al.  Dynamic Models Incorporating Individual Heterogeneity , 2005 .

[13]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[14]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Modeling Household Purchase Behavior with Logistic Normal Regression , 1994 .

[15]  P. Slovic The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[16]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  The Persistence of Marketing Effects on Sales , 1995 .

[17]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .

[18]  Fred M. Feinberg,et al.  The Shape of Advertising Response Functions Revisited: A Model of Dynamic Probabilistic Thresholds , 2004 .

[19]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Fast Polyhedral Adaptive Conjoint Estimation , 2002 .

[20]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[21]  P. Lenk,et al.  Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental Designs , 1996 .

[22]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[23]  Michel Wedel,et al.  The effects of alternative methods of collecting similarity data for Multidimensional Scaling , 1995 .

[24]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  Evolutionary preference/utility functions: A dynamic perspective , 2005 .

[25]  Michael A. West,et al.  Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models (2nd edn) , 1997, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Robert J. Meyer,et al.  A Multiattribute Model of Consumer Choice During Product Learning , 1985 .