A software system for evaluation and training of spatial reasoning and neuroanatomical knowledge in a virtual environment

This paper describes the design and development of a software tool for the evaluation and training of surgical residents using an interactive, immersive, virtual environment. Our objective was to develop a tool to evaluate user spatial reasoning skills and knowledge in a neuroanatomical context, as well as to augment their performance through interactivity. In the visualization, manually segmented anatomical surface images of MRI scans of the brain were rendered using a stereo display to improve depth cues. A magnetically tracked wand was used as a 3D input device for localization tasks within the brain. The movement of the wand was made to correspond to movement of a spherical cursor within the rendered scene, providing a reference for localization. Users can be tested on their ability to localize structures within the 3D scene, and their ability to place anatomical features at the appropriate locations within the rendering.

[1]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[2]  Michael J. Ackerman,et al.  Technical Milestone: The visible Human Male: A Technical Report , 1996, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  Luigi Ferrante,et al.  The use of Brain-suite® teaching tools improves learning of neuroanatomy , 2010 .

[4]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Volume Visualization: A Technical Overview with a Focus on Medical Applications , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[5]  D. R. Montello,et al.  The Role of Spatial Cognition in Medicine: Applications for Selecting and Training Professionals. , 2007 .

[6]  Mark C Preul,et al.  Interactive stereoscopic virtual reality: a new tool for neurosurgical education. Technical note. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  A. Ladd,et al.  Evaluation of a surgical simulator for learning clinical anatomy , 2004, Medical education.

[8]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  The partial-occlusion effect: utilizing semitransparency in 3D human-computer interaction , 1996, TCHI.

[9]  Peter R Bergethon,et al.  A novel three‐dimensional tool for teaching human neuroanatomy , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[10]  Sandrine de Ribaupierre,et al.  Spatial Ability and Training in Virtual Neuroanatomy , 2013, MMVR.

[11]  G. Norman,et al.  How medical students learn spatial anatomy , 2001, The Lancet.

[12]  M. Downes,et al.  Simulation in Neurosurgery: A Review of Computer-Based Simulation Environments and Their Surgical Applications , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[13]  G. Norman,et al.  Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e‐learning instructional designs , 2007, Medical education.

[14]  Roy Eagleson,et al.  Human visual servoing for reaching and grasping: the role of 3D geometric features , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[15]  G R Norman,et al.  Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  François Conti,et al.  Virtual reality simulation in neurosurgery: technologies and evolution. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[17]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis , 1992, Vision Research.

[18]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  A Virtual Environment Testbed for Training Laparoscopic Surgical Skills , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[19]  John A McNulty,et al.  Evaluation of computer‐aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: A six‐year study , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[20]  S. Hamstra,et al.  Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills , 2002, The Lancet.

[21]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.