T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI as a Noninvasive Biomarker of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor vIII Status

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III is a common mutation in glioblastoma, found in approximately 25% of tumors. Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III may accelerate angiogenesis in malignant gliomas. We correlated T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging perfusion parameters with epidermal growth factor receptor variant III status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive patients with glioblastoma and known epidermal growth factor receptor variant III status who had dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging before surgery were evaluated. Volumes of interest were drawn around the entire enhancing tumor on contrast T1-weighted images and then were transferred onto coregistered dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging perfusion maps. Histogram analysis with normalization was performed to determine the relative mean, 75th percentile, and 90th percentile values for plasma volume and contrast transfer coefficient. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was applied to assess the relationship between baseline perfusion parameters and positive epidermal growth factor receptor variant III status. The receiver operating characteristic method was used to select the cutoffs of the dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging perfusion parameters. RESULTS: Increased relative plasma volume and increased relative contrast transfer coefficient parameters were both significantly associated with positive epidermal growth factor receptor variant III status. For epidermal growth factor receptor variant III–positive tumors, relative plasma volume mean was 9.3 and relative contrast transfer coefficient mean was 6.5; for epidermal growth factor receptor variant III–negative tumors, relative plasma volume mean was 3.6 and relative contrast transfer coefficient mean was 3.7 (relative plasma volume mean, P < .001, and relative contrast transfer coefficient mean, P = .008). The predictive powers of relative plasma volume histogram metrics outperformed those of the relative contrast transfer coefficient histogram metrics (P < = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging shows greater perfusion and leakiness in epidermal growth factor receptor variant III–positive glioblastomas than in epidermal growth factor receptor variant III–negative glioblastomas, consistent with the known effect of epidermal growth factor receptor variant III on angiogenesis. Quantitative evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging may be useful as a noninvasive tool for correlating epidermal growth factor receptor variant III expression and related tumor neoangiogenesis. This potential may have implications for monitoring response to epidermal growth factor receptor variant III–targeted therapies.

[1]  M. Kuwano,et al.  ZD1839 (Iressa) induces antiangiogenic effects through inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. , 2002, Cancer research.

[2]  R. Jain,et al.  Correlation of Perfusion Parameters with Genes Related to Angiogenesis Regulation in Glioblastoma: A Feasibility Study , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[3]  D. Haussler,et al.  The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Glioblastoma , 2013, Cell.

[4]  A. Gupta,et al.  Pretreatment Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Perfusion in Glioblastoma: Prediction of EGFR Gene Amplification , 2015, Clinical Neuroradiology.

[5]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways , 2008, Nature.

[6]  M. Lim,et al.  Current Vaccine Trials in Glioblastoma: A Review , 2014, Journal of immunology research.

[7]  Koji Yoshimoto,et al.  Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Yoshitaka Narita,et al.  Tumor heterogeneity is an active process maintained by a mutant EGFR-induced cytokine circuit in glioblastoma. , 2010, Genes & development.

[10]  Y. Kodera,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor variant type III markedly accelerates angiogenesis and tumor growth via inducing c-myc mediated angiopoietin-like 4 expression in malignant glioma , 2013, Molecular Cancer.

[11]  M. Essig,et al.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Relative cerebral blood volume measurements in intracranial mass lesions: interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility study. , 2002, Radiology.

[13]  Ali S. Arbab,et al.  Changes in Vascular Permeability and Expression of Different Angiogenic Factors Following Anti-Angiogenic Treatment in Rat Glioma , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  C. Brennan,et al.  Quantitative assessment of intragenic receptor tyrosine kinase deletions in primary glioblastomas: their prevalence and molecular correlates , 2013, Acta Neuropathologica.

[15]  A. Kaye,et al.  The EGFRvIII variant in glioblastoma multiforme , 2009, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[16]  Seong Ho Park,et al.  Glioma: Application of Histogram Analysis of Pharmacokinetic Parameters from T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging to Tumor Grading , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Treatment-related change versus tumor recurrence in high-grade gliomas: a diagnostic conundrum--use of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion MRI. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Low-grade gliomas: dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging--prediction of patient clinical response. , 2006, Radiology.

[19]  David J. Yang,et al.  Prognostic Effect of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and EGFRvIII in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  Max Wintermark,et al.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked clinical questions. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  E F Halpern,et al.  Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. , 1994, Radiology.

[22]  K. Ahn,et al.  DCE and DSC MR perfusion imaging in the differentiation of recurrent tumour from treatment-related changes in patients with glioma. , 2014, Clinical radiology.

[23]  A. Jackson,et al.  Do cerebral blood volume and contrast transfer coefficient predict prognosis in human glioma? , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  C. Brennan,et al.  Emerging therapies for glioblastoma. , 2014, JAMA neurology.

[25]  P. Loehrer Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma , 2006 .

[26]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Comparison of region‐of‐interest analysis with three different histogram analysis methods in the determination of perfusion metrics in patients with brain gliomas , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Role of Perfusion CT in Glioma Grading and Comparison with Conventional MR Imaging Features , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[29]  Yue Cao,et al.  Physiologic and metabolic magnetic resonance imaging in gliomas. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  In Vivo Correlation of Tumor Blood Volume and Permeability with Histologic and Molecular Angiogenic Markers in Gliomas , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[31]  Sanjeev Chawla,et al.  Use of magnetic perfusion-weighted imaging to determine epidermal growth factor receptor variant III expression in glioblastoma. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[32]  Chul-Kee Park,et al.  Cerebral Blood Volume Analysis in Glioblastomas Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI: A Comparison of Manual and Semiautomatic Segmentation Methods , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  Forest M White,et al.  Oncogenic EGFR Signaling Networks in Glioma , 2009, Science Signaling.