Using an eye-safe laser rangefinder to assist active and passive electro-optical sensor performance prediction in low visibility conditions

Abstract. Laser rangefinders are used in various electro-optical (EO) fire control systems. They often operate at eye-safe wavelengths around 1.55  μm, which extends their utility. The paper investigates the use of a modified eye-safe laser rangefinder at 1.55  μm to obtain information on atmospheric attenuation and couple that information to the performance of active and passive EO sensors with an emphasis of lower visibility conditions. Such information can be of great value both for estimating own sensor capabilities at a given moment as well as estimating the threat capability. One obvious example is ship defense where it is difficult to obtain visibility along variable and slant atmospheric paths, especially in darkness. The experimental equipment and the results from measurements of atmospheric backscatter along various atmospheric paths are presented. The backscatter curve is used to evaluate the extinction. These extinction values are compared with those deduced from a point visibility meter and from echo measurements against two similar nets positioned at two ranges from the sensor. TV and IR images of test targets along a 1.8 km path close to sea surface in the Baltic Sea were collected in parallel with the lidar. A weather station and a scintillometer collected weather and turbulence parameters. Results correlating the lidar attenuation with the imaging performance will be given.

[1]  Vincent Larochelle,et al.  Estimating atmospheric extinction for eyesafe laser rangefinders , 1994 .

[2]  David Harper,et al.  A portable scanning lidar system used for aerosol detection , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  R. Shirkey,et al.  Determination of Atmospheric Path Radiance: Sky-to-Ground Ratio for Wargamers , 2004 .

[4]  L R Bissonnette,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of lidar inversion algorithms. , 1986, Applied optics.

[5]  Tana Maurer,et al.  Predicting range performance of LRG imagers in the presence of natural illumination , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  V. Kovalev.  Lidar measurement of the vertical aerosol extinction profiles with range-dependent backscatter-to-extinction ratios. , 1993, Applied optics.

[7]  Ove Steinvall.  Laser system range calculations and the Lambert W function. , 2009, Applied optics.

[8]  Ove Steinvall,et al.  Passive and active EO sensing close to the sea surface , 2014, Security and Defence.

[9]  Shane D. Mayor,et al.  Polarization lidar at 1.54 m and observations of plumes from aerosol generators , 2007 .

[10]  Francesc Rocadenbosch,et al.  Effects of noise on lidar data inversion with the backward algorithm. , 2004, Applied optics.

[11]  W J Lentz.  The Visioceilometer: A Portable Visibility and Cloud Ceiling Height Lidar. , 1982 .

[12]  Ove Steinvall,et al.  Using an eyesafe military laser range finder for atmospheric sensing , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[13]  J. Klett.  Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios. , 1985, Applied optics.

[14]  Andrei B. Utkin,et al.  Laser rangefinder architecture as a cost-effective platform for lidar fire surveillance , 2009 .

[15]  H. G. Hughes,et al.  Sensitivity of a lidar inversion algorithm to parameters relating atmospheric backscatter and extinction. , 1985, Applied optics.

[16]  J. Klett.  Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns. , 1981, Applied optics.

[17]  Thomas H. Chyba,et al.  Eye-safe compact scanning LIDAR technology , 2007 .

[18]  Norman S. Kopeika,et al.  A System Engineering Approach to Imaging , 1998 .

[19]  W. Middleton,et al.  Vision Through the Atmosphere , 1952 .

[20]  Mary A. Bridges.  The Visioceilometer and Its Tactical Applications. , 1987 .

[21]  Juergen Streicher.  Eye-safe laser radar for the detection of fog banks , 1995, Other Conferences.

[22]  Yitzhak Yitzhaky,et al.  Aerosol MTF revisited , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[23]  Shane D. Mayor,et al.  Eye-safe aerosol lidar at 1.5 microns: progress toward a scanning lidar network , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[24]  Gerrit de Leeuw,et al.  Inversion of lidar signals with the slope method. , 1993, Applied optics.

[25]  C. Werner.  Slant range visibility determination from lidar signatures by the two-point method , 1981 .

[26]  Christoph Muenkel,et al.  Affordable lidar for atmospheric aerosol and cloud studies , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.