Systematic approach for draw solute selection and optimal system design for forward osmosis desalination

Abstract A systematic approach is proposed to find the optimal draw solute and the optimal system for forward osmosis (FO) desalination. Selection of a draw solute and its concentration mainly decides the water flux through FO membrane, as well as the energy requirement for draw solute recovery, i.e. the economy of FO desalination. The proposed approach selects 7 candidate compounds by screening 4058 compounds in OLI and ASPEN chemical databases. Subsequently, the membrane and distillation column processes are designed and optimized for each draw solute by establishing a cost minimization model. Finally, economies of the optimal systems for candidates are compared to find the most competitive draw solute. The proposed method will contribute to designing commercially viable FO desalination systems.

[1]  Roberto Borsani,et al.  Fundamentals and costing of MSF desalination plants and comparison with other technologies , 2005 .

[2]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[3]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications , 2010 .

[4]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Structural flowsheet optimization with complex investment cost functions , 1998 .

[5]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Drinking water from sea water by forward osmosis , 1976 .

[6]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Global optimization for integrated design and control of computationally expensive process models , 2007 .

[7]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO) , 2010 .

[9]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[10]  Richard E. Kravath,et al.  Desalination of sea water by direct osmosis , 1975 .

[11]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[12]  J. Georgiadis,et al.  Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades , 2008, Nature.

[13]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[14]  I. Karagiannis,et al.  Water desalination cost literature: review and assessment , 2008 .

[15]  Raphael Semiat,et al.  Energy issues in desalination processes. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[17]  Thomas Melin,et al.  State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[18]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Modeling of external and internal concentration polarization effect on flux behaviour of forward osmosis , 2008 .

[19]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[20]  Giulio C. Sarti,et al.  Water, salt, and ethanol diffusion through membranes for water recovery by forward (direct) osmosis processes , 2008 .