Analyzing variance in multi-degree-of-freedom movements: uncovering structure versus extracting correlations.

An important aspect of the study of multi-degree-of-freedom motor control is the analysis of high-dimensional variance data. Through the "uncontrolled manifold" (UCM) approach the structure in such data can be discovered and interpreted. The covariation by randomization (CR) approach provides nonlinear and potentially multi-dimensional measures of covariance. We critically examine these two approaches and compare them relative to the three fundamental issues of choice of variables, choice of model, and adoption of either a geometrical or a correlational view of variance. The UCM approach is a geometrical approach that seeks to discover the structure of variance in multi-degree-of-freedom task spaces in which all degrees of freedom have a common metric. The structure of variance in that space is interpreted in terms of its meaning for task variables. The CR approach seeks to uncover correlations between interpretable elemental variables. It requires a defined and common metric in the space of task variables, but not the elemental variables. Although the CR approach is better suited for systems with strong nonlinearities, variance structure that is not caused by correlation but by different amounts of variance in the different elemental variables is undetected by this approach.

[1]  N. A. Bernshteĭn.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[2]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[3]  J A Kelso,et al.  Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. , 1988, Science.

[4]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Dynamic theory of action-perception patterns: The time-before-contact paradigm , 1994 .

[5]  G. Schöner.  Recent Developments and Problems in Human Movement Science and Their Conceptual Implications , 1995 .

[6]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[7]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Massion,et al.  Axial synergies during human upper trunk bending , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  T D Sanger,et al.  Human Arm Movements Described by a Low-Dimensional Superposition of Principal Components , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  K. Kudo,et al.  Compensatory Coordination of Release Parameters in a Throwing Task , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  G. Schöner,et al.  Effects of varying task constraints on solutions to joint coordination in a sit-to-stand task , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  M. Latash,et al.  Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Differential joint coordination in the tasks of standing up and sitting down. , 2002, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Coordination underlying the control of whole body momentum during sit-to-stand. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[18]  M. Latash,et al.  Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Goal-equivalent joint coordination in pointing: affect of vision and arm dominance. , 2002, Motor control.

[20]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Dynamic coordination of body parts during prism adaptation. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Latash,et al.  Approaches to analysis of handwriting as a task of coordinating a redundant motor system. , 2003, Human movement science.

[22]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  A randomization method for the calculation of covariation in multiple nonlinear relations: illustrated with the example of goal-directed movements , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  M. Latash,et al.  Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Effect of accuracy constraint on joint coordination during pointing movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  D. Sternad,et al.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  H. Haken,et al.  A stochastic theory of phase transitions in human hand movement , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion , 2004, The Journal of physiology.