Effect Of Normalization Techniques In Robot Selection Using Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment

Industrial robotic manipulators are general purpose machine to do certain task like moving materials, tools or parts. There are other reprogrammable robots which can be used for welding, spray painting and do certain hazardous task. Robots perform these tasks with precision, accuracy and can also increase the productivity. In today’s competitive world a large number of robots are available in the market with different specification. While selecting a robot the decision maker should look in detail all the attributes which affect the manipulators performance. The attributes can be categorized into beneficial and non beneficial attributes. The attributes in which higher value is desired are known as beneficial attributes like load carrying capacity, end effectors reach etc. Attributes in which lower value is desired is termed as non beneficial attributes like cost, error etc. All these attributes have different unit and are conflicting in nature. Thus decision makers face difficulty in comparing different attributes and selecting Robot. Researchers have solved various industrial robot selection problems using MADM methods. Also the effect of normalization methods was checked on these MADM methods. This paper is another attempt to check the variation in raking performance with the change in normalization technique in a new MADM method i.e. WASPAS method. This paper contain seven section introduction, the literature review of the previous work, Normalization Techniques employed in the paper, Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment method, its application with the help of Illustrative Example, Comparative Analysis with other methods and conclusion.

[1]  Aydin Çelen,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Normalization Procedures in TOPSIS Method: With an Application to Turkish Deposit Banking Market , 2014, Informatica.

[2]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A New Logarithmic Normalization Method in Games Theory , 2008, Informatica.

[3]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection , 2011 .

[4]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[5]  V. P. Agrawal,et al.  Computer aided robot selection: the ‘multiple attribute decision making’ approach , 1991 .

[6]  Subrata Chakraborty,et al.  A simulation based comparative study of normalization procedures in multiattribute decision making , 2007 .

[7]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Multi-criteria Assessment of Facades’ Alternatives: Peculiarities of Ranking Methodology☆ , 2013 .

[8]  Dubravka M. Pavlicic,et al.  Normalisation affects the results of MADM methods , 2001 .

[9]  Rita Almeida Ribeiro,et al.  Normalization Techniques for Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Analytical Hierarchy Process Case Study , 2016, DoCEIS.

[10]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of Facade's Alternatives of Commercial and Public Buildings Based on Multiple Criteria , 2011 .

[11]  Subir Kumar Saha,et al.  Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot , 2004 .

[12]  Jafar Pourmahmoud,et al.  Selection of industrial robots using the Polygons area method , 2014 .

[13]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  A study on the ranking performance of some MCDM methods for industrial robot selection problems , 2016 .

[14]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Ali Jahan,et al.  A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: Improving the materials selection process in engineering design , 2015 .

[16]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  A hybrid multiple attribute decision making method for solving problems of industrial environment , 2011 .

[17]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking method , 2012 .

[18]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Applications of WASPAS Method in Manufacturing Decision Making , 2014, Informatica.

[19]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  A solution to robot selection problems using data envelopment analysis , 2013 .

[20]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Selection, identification and comparison of industrial robots using digraph and matrix methods , 2006 .

[21]  Kavita Devi,et al.  Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Investigating the Effect of Normalization Norms in Flexible Manufacturing Sytem Se- lection Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods , 2014 .