Influence of augmented humans in online interactions during voting events

The advent of the digital era provided a fertile ground for the development of virtual societies, complex systems influencing real-world dynamics. Understanding online human behavior and its relevance beyond the digital boundaries is still an open challenge. Here we show that online social interactions during a massive voting event can be used to build an accurate map of real-world political parties and electoral ranks for Italian elections in 2018. We provide evidence that information flow and collective attention are often driven by a special class of highly influential users, that we name “augmented humans”, who exploit thousands of automated agents, also known as bots, for enhancing their online influence. We show that augmented humans generate deep information cascades, to the same extent of news media and other broadcasters, while they uniformly infiltrate across the full range of identified groups. Digital augmentation represents the cyber-physical counterpart of the human desire to acquire power within social systems.

[1]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[2]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[3]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  The role of hidden influentials in the diffusion of online information cascades , 2013, EPJ Data Science.

[4]  A. Pentland,et al.  Computational Social Science , 2009, Science.

[5]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The rise of social bots , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[7]  Ethan Bueno de Mesquita,et al.  Learning About Voter Rationality , 2018 .

[8]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[9]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Exploring Limits to Prediction in Complex Social Systems , 2016, WWW.

[10]  Dan Mercea,et al.  Serial activists: Political Twitter beyond influentials and the twittertariat , 2016, New Media Soc..

[11]  M. De Domenico,et al.  The Anatomy of a Scientific Rumor , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Critical phenomena in complex networks , 2007, ArXiv.

[13]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[14]  Roberto Di Pietro,et al.  The Paradigm-Shift of Social Spambots: Evidence, Theories, and Tools for the Arms Race , 2017, WWW.

[15]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  The dynamics of information-driven coordination phenomena: A transfer entropy analysis , 2015, Science Advances.

[16]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[17]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Contagion dynamics of extremist propaganda in social networks , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[18]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[19]  Matthias Dehmer,et al.  Data Analytics Applications for Streaming Data From Social Media: What to Predict? , 2018, Front. Big Data.

[20]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[21]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks , 2012, Science.

[22]  Sushil Jajodia,et al.  Who is tweeting on Twitter: human, bot, or cyborg? , 2010, ACSAC '10.

[23]  Roberto Di Pietro,et al.  Fame for sale: Efficient detection of fake Twitter followers , 2015, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Core-Periphery Structure in Networks (Revisited) , 2017, SIAM Rev..

[25]  Wu He,et al.  International Journal of Information Management Social Media Competitive Analysis and Text Mining: a Case Study in the Pizza Industry , 2022 .

[26]  Sean J. Taylor,et al.  Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment , 2013, Science.

[27]  Edward A. Bender,et al.  The Asymptotic Number of Labeled Graphs with Given Degree Sequences , 1978, J. Comb. Theory A.

[28]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network , 2011, Scientific reports.

[29]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[30]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Effects of Network Structure, Competition and Memory Time on Social Spreading Phenomena , 2015, Physical Review. X.

[31]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  The structure of online diffusion networks , 2012, EC '12.

[32]  Jon Crowcroft,et al.  Classification of Twitter Accounts into Automated Agents and Human Users , 2017, 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[33]  Sergey Brin,et al.  Reprint of: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine , 2012, Comput. Networks.

[34]  J. Fowler,et al.  Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity , 2016, Science Advances.

[35]  Michael Bruter,et al.  Understanding the emotional act of voting , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[36]  M. Newman.  Communities, modules and large-scale structure in networks , 2011, Nature Physics.

[37]  Nick Bostrom,et al.  Comprar Human Enhancement | Julian Savulescu | 9780199299720 | Oxford University Press , 2009 .

[38]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Rick Durrett,et al.  Temporal profiles of avalanches on networks , 2016, Nature Communications.

[40]  R. Sparrow.  on Human Enhancement , 2011 .

[41]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[42]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in networks: A user guide , 2016, ArXiv.

[43]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion , 2012, ArXiv.

[44]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election , 2017, First Monday.

[45]  Bruce A. Reed,et al.  A Critical Point for Random Graphs with a Given Degree Sequence , 1995, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[46]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[47]  Panagiotis Takis Metaxas,et al.  What Do Retweets Indicate? Results from User Survey and Meta-Review of Research , 2015, ICWSM.

[48]  Markus Strohmaier,et al.  When Social Bots Attack: Modeling Susceptibility of Users in Online Social Networks , 2012, #MSM.

[49]  D. Ruths,et al.  Social media for large studies of behavior , 2014, Science.

[50]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  The emergence of consensus: a primer , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[52]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization , 2017, ICWSM.

[54]  Chris H. Q. Ding,et al.  A min-max cut algorithm for graph partitioning and data clustering , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.