Perceived organisational support, job involvement and turnover intention in lean production in Sri Lanka

The literature suggests that the bottom-line changes often cited in lean implementation success stories, such as reduced inventories and faster flow times, are not the only results that should be considered. The potential detrimental effects on employees should be considered as well, or turnover and morale problems may sabotage the effectiveness of such implementations. However, the ways in which lean production environment influence employee behaviour has received scant empirical attention. The aim of this paper is to examine the mediating effect of job involvement on the relationship between perceived organisational support and turnover intention in the lean production in Sri Lanka. A random sample of 616 shop-floor employees engaged full-time in export-apparel manufacturing firms that have implemented a formal lean production system in the whole manufacturing function and it has become the standard of operation for at least 1 year in Sri Lanka responded. Regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses. It was found that job involvement partially mediates the relationship between perceived organisational support and turnover intention. The findings provide useful information to better understand employee perceptions toward lean production environment and the findings will be a source of general guidance in stimulating future research in this area.

[1]  M. Vidal.  Lean Production, Worker Empowerment, and Job Satisfaction: A Qualitative Analysis and Critique , 2007 .

[2]  Gary Blau,et al.  Conceptualizing How Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment Affect Turnover and Absenteeism , 1987 .

[3]  Michael Y. Hu,et al.  The human factor in advanced manufacturing technology adoption , 1998 .

[4]  David D. Dawley,et al.  Mentoring, supervisor support, and perceived organizational support: what matters most? , 2008 .

[5]  Ron McLachlin,et al.  Management initiatives and just-in-time manufacturing , 1997 .

[6]  J. Cummings,et al.  Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park,et al.  Lean Production, Six Sigma Quality, TQM and Company Culture , 2006 .

[8]  Raphael Kaplinsky,et al.  The use of a lean production index in explaining the transition to global competitiveness: the auto components sector in South Africa , 2004 .

[9]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  Response Rate in Academic Studies — A Comparative Analysis , 1999 .

[10]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Participation's Effects On Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration Of Research Evidence , 1994 .

[11]  Victor H. Vroom.  Some Personality Determinants of the Effects of Participation , 2019 .

[12]  S. Wayne,et al.  Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  R. Liden,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support And Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective , 1997 .

[14]  John T. Kulas,et al.  Middle Response Functioning in Likert-responses to Personality Items , 2008 .

[15]  Steven P. Brown.  A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. , 1996 .

[16]  Lynne Leveson,et al.  Managing cultural diversity and perceived organizational support: Evidence from Australia , 2009 .

[17]  Paul E. Spector.  Using self‐report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method , 1994 .

[18]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  The effects of lean production on worker job stress , 2006 .

[19]  J. Benders,et al.  Lean Production Assessed by Karasek’s Job Demand–Job Control Model , 2004 .

[20]  Todd A. Boyle,et al.  Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation , 2009 .

[21]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[22]  Karen A. Brown,et al.  A Comparison of Just-in-Time and Batch Manufacturing: The Role of Performance Obstacles , 1991 .

[23]  J. Antonakis,et al.  Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues , 2006 .

[24]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Integration of human resource management and competitive priorities of manufacturing strategy , 2000 .

[25]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[26]  Deborah J. Armstrong,et al.  Information Technology Employees in State Government , 2008 .

[27]  J. K. White,et al.  Job Involvement, Values, Personal Background, Participation in Decision Making, and Job Attitudes , 1975 .

[28]  Thomas N. Martin,et al.  The Multiplicative Interaction Effects of Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment on the Turnover Intentions of Full- and Part-Time Employees , 1995 .

[29]  R. Kanungo,et al.  Measurement of job and work involvement. , 1982 .

[30]  J. French,et al.  A Programmatic Approach to Studying the Industrial Environment and Mental Health , 1962 .

[31]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Chin-Fu Ho,et al.  Information Technology Implementation Strategies for Manufacturing Organizations: A Strategic Alignment Approach , 1996, PACIS.

[33]  S. D. Saleh,et al.  Job Involvement: Concepts and Measurements , 1976 .

[34]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  An investigation of the antecedents of turnover intention for manufacturing plant managers , 1997 .

[35]  A. Adcroft,et al.  Against lean production , 1992 .

[36]  Adrian Pirraglia,et al.  Status of lean manufacturing implementation on secondary wood industries including residential, cabinet, millwork, and panel markets. , 2009 .

[37]  David Dugdale,et al.  Non-financial performance measurement in manufacturing companies , 2005 .

[38]  T. M. Lodahl,et al.  THE DEFINITION AND MEASUREMENT OF JOB INVOLVEMENT. , 1965, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Tomás Bonavía,et al.  An empirical study of lean production in the ceramic tile industry in Spain , 2006 .

[40]  Aaron Lowin,et al.  Participative decision making: A model, literature critique, and prescriptions for research , 1968 .

[41]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance , 2003 .

[42]  Alan Harrison,et al.  New wave manufacturing strategies , 1996 .

[43]  Cipriano Forza,et al.  Work organization in lean production and traditional plants , 1996 .

[44]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Achieving flexible manufacturing competence: The roles of advanced manufacturing technology and operations improvement practices , 2006 .

[45]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  P. Hines,et al.  Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking , 2004 .

[47]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Turnover intention and performance in China: The role of positive affectivity, Chinese values, perceived organizational support and constructive controversy , 2007 .

[48]  Rosemary R. Fullerton,et al.  Lean Manufacturing, Non-Financial Performance Measures, and Financial Performance , 2009 .

[49]  Peter Lynn,et al.  Developing quality standards for cross-national survey research: five approaches , 2003 .

[50]  G. Gurin,et al.  Americans View Their Mental Health , 1979 .

[51]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  RECONCEPTUALIZING THE EFFECTS OF LEAN ON PRODUCTION COSTS WITH EVIDENCE FROM THE F-22 PROGRAM , 2009 .

[52]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  The ego in contemporary psychology. , 1943 .

[54]  S. M. James‐Moore,et al.  Is lean manufacture universally relevant? An investigative methodology , 1997 .

[55]  P. Hom,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium , 2000 .

[56]  A. Pilkington,et al.  Operations management themes, concepts and relationships: a forward retrospective of IJOPM , 2006 .

[57]  C. Duguay,et al.  From mass production to flexible/agile production , 1997 .

[58]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  A Variance Explanation Paradox: When a Little is a Lot , 1985 .

[59]  D. Vollrath,et al.  Employee Participation: Diverse Forms and Different Outcomes , 1988 .

[60]  Sharon Foley,et al.  Linking employees' justice perceptions to organizational commitment and intention to leave: The mediating role of perceived organizational support , 2006 .

[61]  Christer Karlsson,et al.  Change processes towards lean production , 1995 .

[62]  Robert Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support and Extra-Role Performance: Which Leads to Which? , 2009, The Journal of social psychology.

[63]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  Eric Molleman,et al.  Characteristics of work organization in lean production and sociotechnical systems , 1996 .

[65]  D. Allen,et al.  Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: the moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  J. González‐Benito,et al.  A study of the effect of manufacturing proactivity on business performance , 2005 .

[67]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation , 1990 .

[68]  F. Wickert.  Turnover, and Employees' Feelings of Ego‐involvement in the Day‐to‐ Day Operations of a Company , 1951 .

[69]  A. Sohal,et al.  Lean Production: Experience among Australian Organizations , 1994 .