Plasma flows, Birkeland currents and auroral forms in relation to the Svalgaard-Mansurov effect

Abstract. The traditional explanation of the polar cap magnetic deflections, referred to as the Svalgaard-Mansurov effect, is in terms of currents associated with ionospheric flow resulting from the release of magnetic tension on newly open magnetic field lines. In this study, we aim at an updated description of the sources of the Svalgaard-Mansurov effect based on recent observations of configurations of plasma flow channels, Birkeland current systems and aurorae in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system. Central to our description is the distinction between two different flow channels (FC 1 and FC 2) corresponding to two consecutive stages in the evolution of open field lines in Dungey cell convection, with FC 1 on newly open, and FC 2 on old open, field lines. Flow channel FC 1 is the result of ionospheric Pedersen current closure of Birkeland currents flowing along newly open field lines. During intervals of nonzero interplanetary magnetic field By component FC 1 is observed on either side of noon and it is accompanied by poleward moving auroral forms (PMAFs/prenoon and PMAFs/postnoon). In such cases the next convection stage, in the form of flow channel FC 2 on the periphery of the polar cap, is particularly important for establishing an IMF By-related convection asymmetry along the dawn-dusk meridian, which is a central element causing the Svalgaard-Mansurov effect. FC 2 flows are excited by the ionospheric Pedersen current closure of the northernmost pair of Birkeland currents in the four-sheet current system, which is coupled to the tail magnetopause and flank low-latitude boundary layer. This study is based on a review of recent statistical and event studies of central parameters relating to the magnetosphere-ionosphere current systems mentioned above. Temporal-spatial structure in the current systems is obtained by ground-satellite conjunction studies. On this point we emphasize the important information derived from the continuous ground monitoring of the dynamical behaviour of aurora and plasma convection during intervals of well-organised solar wind plasma and magnetic field conditions in interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) during their Earth passage.

[1]  K. Siebert,et al.  Theory of the low latitude boundary layer and its coupling to the ionosphere: A tutorial review , 2013 .

[2]  C. Farrugia,et al.  Substorms and polar cap convection: the 10 January 2004 interplanetary CME case , 2012 .

[3]  Zejun Hu,et al.  Coordinated Cluster/Double Star and ground-based observations of dayside reconnection signatures on 11 February 2004 , 2011 .

[4]  S. Petrinec,et al.  Antiparallel and component reconnection at the dayside magnetopause , 2011 .

[5]  O. Troshichev,et al.  Identification of the IMF sector structure in near-real time by ground magnetic data , 2011 .

[6]  T. Higuchi,et al.  Dayside field‐aligned current source regions , 2010 .

[7]  C. Farrugia,et al.  Polar cap flow channel events: spontaneous and driven responses , 2010 .

[8]  S. Wing,et al.  Multisatellite low‐altitude observations of a magnetopause merging burst , 2010 .

[9]  C. Clauer,et al.  Statistical maps of geomagnetic perturbations as a function of the interplanetary magnetic field , 2010 .

[10]  C. Farrugia,et al.  Polar cap convection/precipitation states during Earth passage of two ICMEs at solar minimum , 2010 .

[11]  C. Farrugia,et al.  Plasma flow channels at the dawn/dusk polar cap boundaries: momentum transfer on old open field lines and the roles of IMF B y and conductivity gradients , 2008 .

[12]  B. Anderson,et al.  Statistical Birkeland current distributions from magnetic field observations by the Iridium constellation , 2008 .

[13]  Charles J. Farrugia,et al.  Poleward moving auroral forms (PMAFs) revisited: responses of aurorae, plasma convection and Birkeland currents in the pre- and postnoon sectors under positive and negative IMF B y conditions , 2007 .

[14]  Charles J. Farrugia,et al.  Role of poleward moving auroral forms in the dawn-dusk auroral precipitation asymmetries induced by IMF By , 2007 .

[15]  L. Blomberg,et al.  Auroral electrojets and boundaries of plasma domains in the magnetosphere during magnetically disturbed intervals , 2006 .

[16]  T. Mukai,et al.  Interplanetary coronal mass ejection and ambient interplanetary magnetic field correlations during the Sun‐Earth connection events of October–November 2003 , 2005 .

[17]  Raymond A. Greenwald,et al.  Dependencies of high-latitude plasma convection: Consideration of interplanetary magnetic field, seasonal, and universal time factors in statistical patterns , 2005 .

[18]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Pulsed flows at the high-altitude cusp poleward boundary, and associated ionospheric convection and particle signatures, during a Cluster - FAST - SuperDARN- Søndrestrøm conjunction under a southwest IMF , 2004 .

[19]  Charles J. Farrugia,et al.  Does the aurora provide evidence for the occurrence of antiparallel magnetopause reconnection , 2003 .

[20]  C. Farrugia,et al.  Temporal variations in a four‐sheet field‐aligned current system and associated aurorae as observed during a Polar‐ground magnetic conjunction in the midmorning sector , 2003 .

[21]  C. Farrugia,et al.  Auroral structure at the cusp equatorward boundary: Relationship with the electron edge of low‐latitude boundary layer precipitation , 2002 .

[22]  C. Farrugia,et al.  Monitoring magnetosheath-magnetosphere interconnection topology from the aurora , 2002 .

[23]  F. Rich,et al.  Polar cap index (PC) as a proxy for ionospheric electric field in the near‐pole region , 2000 .

[24]  M. Lockwood.  Relationship of dayside auroral precipitations to the open‐closed separatrix and the pattern of convective flow , 1997 .

[25]  M. Watanabe,et al.  Synthesis models of dayside field‐aligned currents for strong interplanetary magnetic field By , 1996 .

[26]  W. J. Burke,et al.  Ionospheric signatures of dayside magnetopause transients: A case study using satellite and ground measurements , 1993 .

[27]  W. F. Denig,et al.  Ionospheric signatures of pulsed reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause , 1993, Nature.

[28]  J. Slavin,et al.  Characterization of the IMF By ‐dependent field‐aligned currents in the cleft region based on DE 2 observations , 1993 .

[29]  P. Anderson,et al.  Staircase ion signature in the polar cusp: A case study , 1992 .

[30]  J. Moen,et al.  Periodic auroral events at the midday polar cap boundary: Implications for solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling , 1992 .

[31]  P. Newell,et al.  Ground and satellite observations of an auroral event at the cusp/cleft equatorward boundary , 1992 .

[32]  Per Even Sandholt,et al.  Electrodynamics of the polar cusp ionosphere: a case study , 1989 .

[33]  David J. Southwood,et al.  The ionospheric signature of flux transfer events , 1987 .

[34]  Per Even Sandholt,et al.  Large‐ and small‐scale dynamics of the polar cusp , 1985 .

[35]  R. Howard,et al.  The observation of a coronal transient directed at earth , 1982 .

[36]  F. Mariani,et al.  Magnetic loop behind an interplanetary shock: Voyager, Helios and IMP-8 observations , 1981 .

[37]  W. J. Burke,et al.  Effects of high‐latitude conductivity on observed convection electric fields and Birkeland currents , 1980 .

[38]  C. T. Russell,et al.  Initial ISEE magnetometer results: magnetopause observations , 1978 .

[39]  L. Svalgaard.  Polar cap magnetic variations and their relationship with the interplanetary magnetic sector structure , 1973 .

[40]  J. Wilhjelm,et al.  Critical component of the interplanetary magnetic field responsible for large geomagnetic effects in the polar cap , 1972 .

[41]  Eigil Friis-Christensen,et al.  Interplanetary magnetic-field direction and high-latitude ionospheric currents , 1972 .

[42]  Charles J. Farrugia,et al.  Dayside aurora and the role of IMF ? B y ?/? B z ?: detailed morphology and response to magnetopause reconnection , 2004 .

[43]  Patricia H. Reiff,et al.  Empirical polar cap potentials , 1997 .

[44]  C. Meng,et al.  Ionospheric projections of magnetospheric regions under low and high solar wind pressure conditions , 1994 .

[45]  T. Potemra,et al.  SOURCES OF LARGE-SCALE BIRKELAND CURRENTS , 1994 .

[46]  N. Fukushima.  EQUIVALENCE IN GROUND GEOMAGNETIC EFFECT OF CHAPMAN--VESTINE'S AND BIRKELAND--ALFVEN'S ELECTRIC CURRENT-SYSTEMS FOR POLAR MAGNETIC STORMS. , 1969 .

[47]  S. Mansurov.  NEW EVIDENCE OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAGNETIC FIELDS IN SPACE AND ON EARTH. , 1969 .