Automated detection and control of volunteer potato plants

High amounts of manual labor are needed to control volunteer potato plants in arable fields. Due to the high costs, this leads to incomplete control of these weed plants, and they spread diseases like Phytophthora infestans to other fields. This results in higher environmental loads by curative spraying of crop protection chemicals, which is in contradiction to the required decreased use of crop protection chemicals to save the environment. Therefore, the main objective of this thesis was “to develop a system for automated detection and control of volunteer potato plants”. A systematic design approach was used to define a program of requirements and to identify and order possible solutions to accomplish the detection and control. The main requirements were a travel speed of up to 2 m s-1, resolution of control at least 10×10 mm, work under variable natural light conditions, control of volunteer plants > 95%, and undesired control of sugar beet plants < 5%. The design strategy resulted in color and near-infrared machine vision as detection method and a micro-sprayer for application of glyphosate as a result. Furthermore, issues were identified that required further investigation to successfully come to a proof of principle machine. The research was then focused on: - Detection of volunteer potato plants, - Control of volunteer potato plants, - Real-time implementation of integrated detection and control on a proof of principle machine. For the purpose of detection of volunteer potato plants, the narrow band spectral reflectance properties of volunteer potato plants and sugar beet plants were analyzed. Narrow band spectral measurements were done in 2006 and 2007 on two different fields. This resulted in 15 datasets on clay and sand soil. Discriminating wavebands were selected and classified with neural networks and statistical discriminant analysis. A neural network with two hidden neurons performed best for classification. Two sensors were used covering the range from 450 to 900 nm and from 900 to 1650 nm. Both visible and near infra-red wavebands were responsible for discrimination. From the analysis 450, 765, and 855 nm from sensor 1 and 900, 1440, and 1530 nm from sensor 2 were identified as important discriminative wavebands. However, the discriminative wavelengths depended on field and crop status and could not be generalized. Ten wavebands that were optimally adapted to the datasets gave 99% true negative classification of volunteer potato plants. On the other hand, a fixed set of three wavebands that was not adapted to the individual datasets gave 80% true negative classification of volunteer potato plants. This indicates that adaptive feature sets are required for classification. The development of the machine vision detection system started with measurements in 2005. Color based detection showed that the difference in classification results was larger between fields than the difference between a static neural network and static Bayesian classification. Then, machine vision measurements in 2006 with a color camera under changing and constant natural light conditions showed that crop and weed properties change within a field. An adaptive instead of static classification increased classification accuracy from 34.9% to 67.7% under changing light conditions. Under constant natural light conditions, the classification accuracy increased from 84.6% to 89.8%. So, adaptive classifiers are required and were implemented in the further research as these gave significantly higher classification results. As a next step, besides a color camera also a near-infrared camera was used for imaging within the proof of principle machine, as this gave a better feature set for classification. Additionally, the field of view of the cameras was shielded and artificial light was used to maintain constant light conditions. For the real-time implementation, an unsupervised adaptive Bayesian classifier was used. The crop row position and crop row width were determined and a Kalman filter improved tracking of the rows, to adapt to the varying properties of the crop in the field. Data from between the crop rows was trained as the volunteer potato class and data from within the crop row was trained as the sugar beet class. This resulted in good quality training data for the Bayes classifier. The system was unsupervised, as it learned and trained itself based on row recognition. The features that were used for training and classification were: blue, hue, saturation, excessive green, red minus blue, near-infrared and near-infrared difference vegetation index (NDVI). These feature values within the training data were continuously locally adapted, in two first-in-first-out buffers both with an area of 500 cm2 for sugar beet and volunteer potato plants. Measurements were done on seven days in 2007 and 2008. The results showed a trade-off between the percentage of correct classified volunteer potato plants and the percentage of misclassification of sugar beet plants. In one of the fields 96.6% volunteer potato classification and 8.0% sugar beet misclassification was achieved. Connected to the detection system was a micro-sprayer that applied glyphosate in gel to the volunteer potato plants. Spraying gel through a micro-sprayer was innovative. This proved to work in the application of glyphosate on plants. As knowledge of the dose response of glyphosate on potato was outdated and could not be used for plant specific application, a dose-response study was done with flat fan nozzles on 120 potato plants to determine the efficacy of glyphosate. The effect parameters tuber weight and photosynthesis activity were analyzed with log-logistic nonlinear regression methods. This resulted in an amount of 843 μg a.e. per plant for reduction of tuber weight and photosynthesis with 90%. This amount was applied on plants with a height of 6.1±1.39 cm and an area of 53.3±19.6 cm2. As glyphosate was to be applied with a micro-sprayer, the dose-response study was extended to 500 greenhouse grown potato plants. Five application methods were used: 1) flat fan water application, 2) flat fan gel application, 3) micro-sprayer low density distribution, 4) micro-sprayer medium density distribution, and 5) micro-sprayer high density distribution. As effect parameters again tuber weight, photosynthesis activity, and in addition shoot dry weight were used. They were analyzed with ANOVAs and box-plots. The micro-sprayer dense distribution with 3022 droplets m-2 and 3.3 mg per droplet had the best efficacy. The micro-sprayer controlled the volunteer potato plants with less glyphosate compared to flat fan nozzles. Furthermore, it had a centimeter precision resolution and low risks of unwanted crop damage. With real-time hardware, machine vision detection and micro-sprayer were integrated to a proof of principle machine. A travel speed of 0.8 m s-1 was reached with the proof of principle machine and it had an approximated capacity of 2.5 hrs ha-1. This was the maximum that could be realized as the micro-sprayer valve actuation frequency was maximally 80 Hz. The image processing time for one image of 0.2 m length was 195 ms. At this travel speed automated feedback systems on the operation of the system are required to support and replace human surveillance. Therefore, the Frechet distance measure between multivariate distributions was introduced as quality indicator of classification performance. The Frechet distance measure was significantly smaller when the classification performance was low, as identified on ground truth determined classification results afterwards. This proves that the performance could be predicted with a distance measure between multivariate distributions. In case of poor predicted classification performance, the application of glyphosate with the micro-sprayer can be halted to prevent unwanted crop damage and economic losses. The accuracy of application was ±1.4 cm in longitudinal direction and ±0.75 cm in transversal direction. During a field trial, up to 84% of the volunteer plants were controlled with 1.4% unwanted controlled sugar beet plants. To sum up, within this research a proof of principle machine for automated detection and control of volunteer potato plants in sugar beet fields has successfully been developed. The system performed closely to the requirements that were set in the start-up of the project. The percentage of 95% controlled volunteer potato plants can be reached. On the other hand, the travel speed still has to be increased from 0.8 m s-1 to 2.0 m s-1. The system is an example of new technology that can be developed for practical applications to reduce the amount of required labor and to reduce the crop protection inputs for weed control in arable farming.

[1]  S. Christensen,et al.  Real‐time weed detection, decision making and patch spraying in maize, sugarbeet, winter wheat and winter barley , 2003 .

[2]  J. Marchant,et al.  Shadow-invariant classification for scenes illuminated by daylight. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  A. T. Nieuwenhuizen,et al.  Performance evaluation of an automated detection and control system for volunteer potatoes in sugar beet fields , 2010 .

[4]  J. V. D. Zande,et al.  Automated detection and spraying of volunteer potato plants in sugar beet fields , 2008 .

[5]  V. Bergeron Designing intelligent fluids for controlling spray applications , 2003 .

[6]  J. E. Jensen,et al.  Log-Logistic Analysis of Herbicide Dose-Response Relationships , 1995, Weed Technology.

[7]  S. Prasher,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data by decision trees and artificial neural networks to identify weed stress and nitrogen status of corn , 2003 .

[8]  A. Womac,et al.  Characterization of the Spray Droplet Spectra and Patterns of Four Venturi-Type Drift Reduction Nozzles , 1999, Weed Technology.

[9]  A. T. Nieuwenhuizen Prototype voor bestrijding van aardappelopslag ook in de suikerbietenrij , 2007 .

[10]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Scientific writing , 2008, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  H.J.J. Janssen,et al.  Methodic design of a measurement and control system for climate control in horticulture , 2008 .

[12]  Björn Åstrand Vision Based Perception for Mechatronic Weed Control , 2005 .

[13]  J. Hemming,et al.  PA—Precision Agriculture: Computer-Vision-based Weed Identification under Field Conditions using Controlled Lighting , 2001 .

[14]  Alberto Tellaeche,et al.  A new vision-based approach to differential spraying in precision agriculture , 2008 .

[15]  John A. Marchant,et al.  Comparison of a Bayesian classifier with a multilayer feed-forward neural network using the example of plant/weed/soil discrimination , 2003 .

[16]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological image analysis applied to crop field mapping , 2000, Image Vis. Comput..

[17]  Enrico Graglia,et al.  Importance of herbicide concentration, number of droplets and droplet size on growth of Solanum nigrum L , using droplet application of glyphosate , 2004 .

[18]  W. S. Lee,et al.  Robotic Weed Control System for Tomatoes , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[19]  J. Streibig,et al.  Linking fluorescence induction curve and biomass in herbicide screening. , 2003, Pest management science.

[20]  A. Mulder,et al.  Production, survival and infectivity of oospores of Phytophthora infestans , 2000 .

[21]  Dallas E. Peterson,et al.  Factors affecting color-based weed detection. , 2000 .

[22]  Jan Vos,et al.  A case history: Hundred years of potato production in Europe with special reference to the Netherlands , 1992, American Potato Journal.

[23]  G. van Straten,et al.  A vision based row detection system for sugar beet , 2005 .

[24]  Lei Tian,et al.  Real-time weed detection in outdoor field conditions , 1999, Other Conferences.

[25]  M. Cochrane Using vegetation reflectance variability for species level classification of hyperspectral data , 2000 .

[26]  S. Sharma,et al.  Effects of two surfactant series on the absorption and translocation of ¹⁴C-glyphosate in sicklepod and prickly sida , 2007 .

[27]  J. Marchant,et al.  Segmentation of row crop plants from weeds using colour and morphology , 2003 .

[28]  W. Taylor,et al.  The effect of drop speed, size and surfactant on the deposition of spray on barley and radish or mustard , 1983 .

[29]  J. C. van de Zande,et al.  Classification of sugar beet and volunteer potato reflection spectra with a neural network and statistical discriminant analysis to select discriminative wavelengths , 2010 .

[30]  N. D. Tillett,et al.  Increasing Work Rate in Vision Guided Precision Banded Operations , 2006 .

[31]  T. Hague,et al.  A bandpass filter-based approach to crop row location and tracking , 2001 .

[32]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[33]  Lei Tian,et al.  NARROW-BAND AND DERIVATIVE-BASED VEGETATION INDICES FOR HYPERSPECTRAL DATA , 2004 .

[34]  S. Christensen,et al.  Colour and shape analysis techniques for weed detection in cereal fields , 2000 .

[35]  Lie Tang Machine Vision Systems for Real-Time Plant Variability Sensing and in-Field Application , 2002 .

[36]  Greg Welch,et al.  An Introduction to Kalman Filter , 1995, SIGGRAPH 2001.

[37]  Daniel Bonn,et al.  Controlling droplet deposition with polymer additives , 2000, Nature.

[38]  J. De Baerdemaeker,et al.  Weed Detection Using Canopy Reflection , 2002, Precision Agriculture.

[39]  J. Masiunas,et al.  Glyphosate Activity in Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Under Different Temperature Regimes and Light Levels , 1988, Weed Science.

[40]  Lei Tian,et al.  Machine-vision weed density estimation for real-time, outdoor lighting conditions , 1999 .

[41]  T. Borregaard,et al.  Crop–weed Discrimination by Line Imaging Spectroscopy , 2000 .

[42]  John A. Marchant,et al.  Evaluation of an imaging sensor for detecting vegetation using different waveband combinations , 2001 .

[43]  R. Boydston Volunteer Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Control with Herbicides and Cultivation in Field Corn (Zea mays)1 , 2001, Weed Technology.

[44]  P. Williams,et al.  The influence of the extensional viscosity of very low concentrations of high molecular mass water-soluble polymers on atomisation and droplet impact. , 2008, Pest management science.

[45]  G. Polder,et al.  Real-time vision-based detection of Rumex obtusifolius in grassland. , 2009 .

[46]  G. Meyer,et al.  Verification of color vegetation indices for automated crop imaging applications , 2008 .

[47]  Ken M. Wallace,et al.  Methods and tools for decision making in engineering design , 1995 .

[48]  A. T. Nieuwenhuizen,et al.  Colour based detection of volunteer potatoes as weeds in sugar beet fields using machine vision , 2007, Precision Agriculture.

[49]  Lei Tian,et al.  Environmentally adaptive segmentation algorithm for outdoor image segmentation , 1998 .

[50]  R. Boydston,et al.  Volunteer Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Control with Herbicides and Cultivation in Onion (Allium cepa)1 , 2002, Weed Technology.

[51]  R. Boydston,et al.  Managing Volunteer Potato (Solanum tuberosum) in Field Corn with Mesotrione and Arthropod Herbivory1 , 2005, Weed Technology.

[52]  J. Marchant,et al.  Color invariant for daylight changes: relaxing the constraints on illuminants. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[53]  C. Jones,et al.  Wheat Response to Simulated Glyphosate Drift , 2007, Weed Technology.

[54]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[55]  J. Streibig,et al.  Clodinafop changes the chlorophyll fluorescence induction curve , 2005, Weed Science.

[56]  R. K. Agrawal,et al.  Incremental Bayesian classification for multivariate normal distribution data , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[57]  C Kempenaaar,et al.  Reduction of herbicide use and emission by new weed control methods and strategies. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[58]  R. Boydston,et al.  Effect of Shoot Removal During Tuberization on Volunteer Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Tuber Production1 , 2002 .

[59]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  Foliar spray banding characteristics , 2004 .

[60]  P. Curran Remote sensing of foliar chemistry , 1989 .

[61]  Neil A. Thacker,et al.  Performance characterization in computer vision: A guide to best practices , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[62]  Mieke Uyttendaele,et al.  Wageningen Academic Publishers , 2005 .

[63]  David C. Slaughter,et al.  HERBICIDE MICRO-DOSING FOR WEED CONTROL IN FIELD-GROWN PROCESSING TOMATOES , 2004 .

[64]  Scott A. Shearer,et al.  BACKPROPAGATION NEURAL NETWORK DESIGN AND EVALUATION FOR CLASSIFYING WEED SPECIES USING COLOR IMAGE TEXTURE , 2000 .

[65]  A. Smith,et al.  Weed–Crop Discrimination Using Remote Sensing: A Detached Leaf Experiment1 , 2003, Weed Technology.

[66]  T. C. Mueller,et al.  Effect of Venturi-Type Nozzles and Application Volume on Postemergence Herbicide Efficacy1 , 2001, Weed Technology.

[67]  David C. Slaughter,et al.  PULSED-JET MICROSPRAY APPLICATIONS FOR HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION OF DEPOSITION ON BIOLOGICAL TARGETS , 2004 .

[68]  G. Douglas THE INFLUENCE OF SIZE OF SPRAY DROPLETS ON THE HERBICIDAL ACTIVITY OF DIQUAT AND PARAQUAT , 1968 .

[69]  Albert-Jan Baerveldt,et al.  An Agricultural Mobile Robot with Vision-Based Perception for Mechanical Weed Control , 2002, Auton. Robots.

[70]  Thomas Rath,et al.  Improving plant discrimination in image processing by use of different colour space transformations , 2002 .

[71]  Gaines E. Miles,et al.  MACHINE VISION AND IMAGE PROCESSING FOR PLANT IDENTIFICATION. , 1986 .

[72]  A. T. Nieuwenhuizen,et al.  Adaptive detection of volunteer potato plants in sugar beet fields , 2010, Precision Agriculture.

[73]  G. Meyer,et al.  Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions , 1994 .

[74]  Arthur Gelb,et al.  Applied Optimal Estimation , 1974 .

[75]  N. D. Tillett,et al.  Inter-row vision guidance for mechanical weed control in sugar beet , 2002 .

[76]  H. T. Søgaard,et al.  Application Accuracy of a Machine Vision-controlled Robotic Micro-dosing System , 2007 .

[77]  D. Wyse,et al.  Influence of Glyphosate Concentration on Glyphosate Absorption and Translocation in Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) , 1988, Weed Science.

[78]  Lisa Tang,et al.  Color-based in-field volunteer potato detection using a bayesian classifier and an adaptive neural network , 2005 .

[79]  M. Devine,et al.  Physiology of Herbicide Action , 1993 .

[80]  P. Thenkabail,et al.  Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices and Their Relationships with Agricultural Crop Characteristics , 2000 .

[81]  Rich Caruana,et al.  C2FS: An Algorithm for Feature Selection in Cascade Neural Networks , 2006, The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings.

[82]  M. May,et al.  Glyphosate applied to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet and ‘volunteer’ potatoes reduces populations of potato cyst nematodes and the number and size of daughter tubers , 2000 .

[83]  D. C. Cloutier,et al.  The design of an autonomous weeding robot. , 2004 .

[84]  P. Lutman,et al.  The activity of glyphosate and aminotriazole against volunteer potato plants and their daughter tubers , 1978 .

[85]  E. J. van Henten,et al.  Real time vision detection of weed potato plants in sugar beet fields , 2008 .

[86]  Volker Roth,et al.  Adaptive Feature Selection in Image Segmentation , 2004, DAGM-Symposium.

[87]  D. Smid,et al.  Phytotoxicity and Translocation of Glyphosate in the Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Prior to Tuber Initiation , 1981, Weed Science.

[88]  K. H. Roth,et al.  Foundation of methodical procedures in design , 1981 .

[89]  N. M. Western,et al.  Physical, chemical and biological appraisal of alternative spray techniques in cereals , 1986 .

[90]  A. T. Nieuwenhuizen Precisiebestrijding van aardappelopslag , 2008 .

[91]  P. Struik Trends in Agricultural Science with Special Reference to Research and Development in the Potato Sector , 2006, Potato Research.

[92]  L. Tian,et al.  A Review on Remote Sensing of Weeds in Agriculture , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[93]  Yoh-Han Pao,et al.  Adaptive pattern recognition and neural networks , 1989 .

[94]  R. E. Williamson,et al.  Influence of Droplet Size on Effectiveness of Low-Volume Herbicidal Sprays , 1963 .

[95]  J. Bouma,et al.  Soil science and society in the Dutch context , 2003 .

[96]  A. Verho,et al.  Systematic and innovative design of a mechatronic product , 1992 .

[97]  Jagadeesh Mosali,et al.  Identification of Optical Spectral Signatures for Detecting Cheat and Ryegrass in Winter Wheat , 2005 .