Opportunities for crash and injury reduction: A multiharm approach for crash data analysis

ABSTRACT Objective: A multiharm approach for analyzing crash and injury data was developed for the ultimate purpose of getting a richer picture of motor vehicle crash outcomes for identifying research opportunities in crash safety. Methods: Methods were illustrated using a retrospective analysis of 69,597 occupant cases from NASS CDS from 2005 to 2015. Occupant cases were analyzed by frequency and severity of outcome: fatality, injury by Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), number of cases, attributable fatality, disability, and injury costs. Comparative analysis variables included precrash scenario, impact type, and injured body region. Results: Crash and injury prevention opportunities vary depending on the search parameters. For example, occupants in rear-end crash scenarios were more frequent than in any other precrash configuration, yet there were significantly more fatalities and serious injury cases in control loss, road departure, and opposite direction crashes. Fatality is most frequently associated with head and thorax injury, and disability is primarily associated with extremity injury. Costs attributed to specific body regions are more evenly distributed, dominated by injuries to the head, thorax, and extremities but with contributions from all body regions. Though AIS 3+ can be used as a single measure of harm, an analysis based on multiple measures of harm gives a much more detailed picture of the risk presented by a particular injury or set of crash conditions. Conclusions: The developed methods represent a new approach to crash data mining that is expected to be useful for the identification of research priorities and opportunities for reduction of crashes and injuries. As the pace of crash safety improvement accelerates with innovations in both active and passive safety, these techniques for combining outcome measures for insights beyond fatality and serious injury will be increasingly valuable.

[1]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY INDEX (FCI) , 1994 .

[2]  S L Stucki,et al.  A study of the NASS-CDS system for injury/fatality rates of occupants in various restraints and a discussion of alternative presentation methods. , 2000, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[3]  Gerald S. Poplin,et al.  Implications of Functional Capacity Loss and Fatality for Vehicle Safety Prioritization , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[4]  C. Tingvall,et al.  Risk of permanent medical impairment (RPMI) in road traffic accidents. , 2008, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[5]  M Segui-Gomex APPLICATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY INDEX TO NASS CDS DATA , 1996 .

[6]  Stephen A Ridella,et al.  Ranking injury codes using optimization methodology , 2006 .

[7]  Wassim G Najm,et al.  Statistics of Light-Vehicle Pre-Crash Scenarios Based on 2011–2015 National Crash Data , 2019 .

[8]  A. C. Malliaris,et al.  Harm Causation and Ranking in Car Crashes , 1985 .

[9]  S D Stern New "electronic" data collection methods in the national automotive sampling system crashworthiness data system , 1998 .

[10]  M. Chiron,et al.  The fatal injuries of car drivers. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[11]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  The development of the Functional Capacity Index. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Differences in Long-term Medical Consequences Depending on Impact Direction Involving Passenger Cars , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[13]  Eduard Zaloshnja,et al.  The Economic and Societal Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2010 (Revised) , 2015 .

[14]  W. Haddon,et al.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. , 1974, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  Ana Maria Eigen,et al.  Identification of Real World Injury Patterns in Aid of Dummy Development , 2005 .

[16]  Peter G Martin,et al.  Ranking of NASS injury codes by survivability. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[17]  E. A. Garthe,et al.  Why people die in motor vehicle crashes: linking detailed causes of death with FARS data , 1998 .

[18]  Thomas A Gennarelli,et al.  AIS 2005: a contemporary injury scale. , 2006, Injury.

[19]  Joel D Stitzel,et al.  Mortality-based Quantification of Injury Severity for Frequently Occurring Motor Vehicle Crash Injuries. , 2013, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[20]  Sharon L. Lohr,et al.  Sampling: Design and Analysis , 1999 .